Cargando…

Optimal treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND: There is no clear consensus regarding systemic treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer (OC). Clinical trials are challenging because of the relatively low incidence and good prognosis. Initial results of the International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm (ICON)1 trial demonstrated benefit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Collinson, F., Qian, W., Fossati, R., Lissoni, A., Williams, C., Parmar, M., Ledermann, J., Colombo, N., Swart, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4037858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24631948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdu116
_version_ 1782318294298001408
author Collinson, F.
Qian, W.
Fossati, R.
Lissoni, A.
Williams, C.
Parmar, M.
Ledermann, J.
Colombo, N.
Swart, A.
author_facet Collinson, F.
Qian, W.
Fossati, R.
Lissoni, A.
Williams, C.
Parmar, M.
Ledermann, J.
Colombo, N.
Swart, A.
author_sort Collinson, F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is no clear consensus regarding systemic treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer (OC). Clinical trials are challenging because of the relatively low incidence and good prognosis. Initial results of the International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm (ICON)1 trial demonstrated benefit in both overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) with adjuvant chemotherapy. We report results of 10-year follow-up to establish whether benefits are maintained longer term and discuss how this and other available evidence from randomised trials can be used to guide treatment options regarding the need for, and choice of, adjuvant chemotherapy regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ICON1 recruited women with OC following primary surgery in whom there was uncertainty as to whether adjuvant chemotherapy was indicated. Patients were randomly assigned to adjuvant or no adjuvant chemotherapy. Platinum-based chemotherapy was recommended and 87% received single-agent carboplatin. Analyses of long-term treatment benefits and interaction with risk groups were carried out. A high-risk group of women was defined with stage 1B/1C grade 2/3, any stage 1 grade 3 or clear-cell histology. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 10 years, the estimated hazard ratio (HR) for RFS was 0.69 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51–0.94, P = 0.02] and OS 0.71 (95% CI 0.52–0.98, P = 0.04) in favour of chemotherapy. In absolute terms, there was a 10% (60%–70%) improvement in RFS and a 9% (64%–73%) improvement in OS; the benefit of chemotherapy might be greater in high-risk disease (18% improvement in OS). Uncertainty remains about the optimal chemotherapy regimen. The only randomised trial data available are from a subset of 120 stage 1 patients in ICON3 where the treatment difference, comparing carboplatin with carboplatin/paclitaxel was estimated with relatively wide CIs [progression-free survival HR = 0.71 (95% CI 0.39–1.32) and OS HR = 0.98 (95% CI 0.49–1.93)]. CONCLUSIONS: Extended follow-up from ICON1 confirms that adjuvant chemotherapy should be offered to women with early-stage OC, particularly those with high-risk disease. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBERS: ISRCTN11916376 for ICON1 and ISRCTN57157825 for ICON3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4037858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40378582014-05-29 Optimal treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer Collinson, F. Qian, W. Fossati, R. Lissoni, A. Williams, C. Parmar, M. Ledermann, J. Colombo, N. Swart, A. Ann Oncol Original Articles BACKGROUND: There is no clear consensus regarding systemic treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer (OC). Clinical trials are challenging because of the relatively low incidence and good prognosis. Initial results of the International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm (ICON)1 trial demonstrated benefit in both overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) with adjuvant chemotherapy. We report results of 10-year follow-up to establish whether benefits are maintained longer term and discuss how this and other available evidence from randomised trials can be used to guide treatment options regarding the need for, and choice of, adjuvant chemotherapy regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ICON1 recruited women with OC following primary surgery in whom there was uncertainty as to whether adjuvant chemotherapy was indicated. Patients were randomly assigned to adjuvant or no adjuvant chemotherapy. Platinum-based chemotherapy was recommended and 87% received single-agent carboplatin. Analyses of long-term treatment benefits and interaction with risk groups were carried out. A high-risk group of women was defined with stage 1B/1C grade 2/3, any stage 1 grade 3 or clear-cell histology. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 10 years, the estimated hazard ratio (HR) for RFS was 0.69 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51–0.94, P = 0.02] and OS 0.71 (95% CI 0.52–0.98, P = 0.04) in favour of chemotherapy. In absolute terms, there was a 10% (60%–70%) improvement in RFS and a 9% (64%–73%) improvement in OS; the benefit of chemotherapy might be greater in high-risk disease (18% improvement in OS). Uncertainty remains about the optimal chemotherapy regimen. The only randomised trial data available are from a subset of 120 stage 1 patients in ICON3 where the treatment difference, comparing carboplatin with carboplatin/paclitaxel was estimated with relatively wide CIs [progression-free survival HR = 0.71 (95% CI 0.39–1.32) and OS HR = 0.98 (95% CI 0.49–1.93)]. CONCLUSIONS: Extended follow-up from ICON1 confirms that adjuvant chemotherapy should be offered to women with early-stage OC, particularly those with high-risk disease. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBERS: ISRCTN11916376 for ICON1 and ISRCTN57157825 for ICON3. Oxford University Press 2014-06 2014-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4037858/ /pubmed/24631948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdu116 Text en © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Collinson, F.
Qian, W.
Fossati, R.
Lissoni, A.
Williams, C.
Parmar, M.
Ledermann, J.
Colombo, N.
Swart, A.
Optimal treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer
title Optimal treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer
title_full Optimal treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer
title_fullStr Optimal treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer
title_full_unstemmed Optimal treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer
title_short Optimal treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer
title_sort optimal treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4037858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24631948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdu116
work_keys_str_mv AT collinsonf optimaltreatmentofearlystageovariancancer
AT qianw optimaltreatmentofearlystageovariancancer
AT fossatir optimaltreatmentofearlystageovariancancer
AT lissonia optimaltreatmentofearlystageovariancancer
AT williamsc optimaltreatmentofearlystageovariancancer
AT parmarm optimaltreatmentofearlystageovariancancer
AT ledermannj optimaltreatmentofearlystageovariancancer
AT colombon optimaltreatmentofearlystageovariancancer
AT swarta optimaltreatmentofearlystageovariancancer
AT optimaltreatmentofearlystageovariancancer