Cargando…

Phragmites australis management in the United States: 40 years of methods and outcomes

Studies on invasive plant management are often short in duration and limited in the methods tested, and lack an adequate description of plant communities that replace the invader following removal. Here we present a comprehensive review of management studies on a single species, in an effort to eluc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hazelton, Eric L. G., Mozdzer, Thomas J., Burdick, David M., Kettenring, Karin M., Whigham, Dennis F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4038441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24790122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plu001
_version_ 1782318347878137856
author Hazelton, Eric L. G.
Mozdzer, Thomas J.
Burdick, David M.
Kettenring, Karin M.
Whigham, Dennis F.
author_facet Hazelton, Eric L. G.
Mozdzer, Thomas J.
Burdick, David M.
Kettenring, Karin M.
Whigham, Dennis F.
author_sort Hazelton, Eric L. G.
collection PubMed
description Studies on invasive plant management are often short in duration and limited in the methods tested, and lack an adequate description of plant communities that replace the invader following removal. Here we present a comprehensive review of management studies on a single species, in an effort to elucidate future directions for research in invasive plant management. We reviewed the literature on Phragmites management in North America in an effort to synthesize our understanding of management efforts, identify gaps in knowledge and improve the efficacy of management. Additionally, we assessed recent ecological findings concerning Phragmites mechanisms of invasion and integrated these findings into our recommendations for more effective management. Our overall goal is to examine whether or not current management approaches can be improved and whether they promote reestablishment of native plant communities. We found: (i) little information on community-level recovery of vegetation following removal of Phragmites; and (ii) most management approaches focus on the removal of Phragmites from individual stands or groups of stands over a relatively small area. With a few exceptions, recovery studies did not monitor vegetation for substantial durations, thus limiting adequate evaluation of the recovery trajectory. We also found that none of the recovery studies were conducted in a landscape context, even though it is now well documented that land-use patterns on adjacent habitats influence the structure and function of wetlands, including the expansion of Phragmites. We suggest that Phragmites management needs to shift to watershed-scale efforts in coastal regions, or larger management units inland. In addition, management efforts should focus on restoring native plant communities, rather than simply eradicating Phragmites stands. Wetlands and watersheds should be prioritized to identify ecosystems that would benefit most from Phragmites management and those where the negative impact of management would be minimal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4038441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40384412014-05-30 Phragmites australis management in the United States: 40 years of methods and outcomes Hazelton, Eric L. G. Mozdzer, Thomas J. Burdick, David M. Kettenring, Karin M. Whigham, Dennis F. AoB Plants Invited Reviews Studies on invasive plant management are often short in duration and limited in the methods tested, and lack an adequate description of plant communities that replace the invader following removal. Here we present a comprehensive review of management studies on a single species, in an effort to elucidate future directions for research in invasive plant management. We reviewed the literature on Phragmites management in North America in an effort to synthesize our understanding of management efforts, identify gaps in knowledge and improve the efficacy of management. Additionally, we assessed recent ecological findings concerning Phragmites mechanisms of invasion and integrated these findings into our recommendations for more effective management. Our overall goal is to examine whether or not current management approaches can be improved and whether they promote reestablishment of native plant communities. We found: (i) little information on community-level recovery of vegetation following removal of Phragmites; and (ii) most management approaches focus on the removal of Phragmites from individual stands or groups of stands over a relatively small area. With a few exceptions, recovery studies did not monitor vegetation for substantial durations, thus limiting adequate evaluation of the recovery trajectory. We also found that none of the recovery studies were conducted in a landscape context, even though it is now well documented that land-use patterns on adjacent habitats influence the structure and function of wetlands, including the expansion of Phragmites. We suggest that Phragmites management needs to shift to watershed-scale efforts in coastal regions, or larger management units inland. In addition, management efforts should focus on restoring native plant communities, rather than simply eradicating Phragmites stands. Wetlands and watersheds should be prioritized to identify ecosystems that would benefit most from Phragmites management and those where the negative impact of management would be minimal. Oxford University Press 2014-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4038441/ /pubmed/24790122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plu001 Text en Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Invited Reviews
Hazelton, Eric L. G.
Mozdzer, Thomas J.
Burdick, David M.
Kettenring, Karin M.
Whigham, Dennis F.
Phragmites australis management in the United States: 40 years of methods and outcomes
title Phragmites australis management in the United States: 40 years of methods and outcomes
title_full Phragmites australis management in the United States: 40 years of methods and outcomes
title_fullStr Phragmites australis management in the United States: 40 years of methods and outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Phragmites australis management in the United States: 40 years of methods and outcomes
title_short Phragmites australis management in the United States: 40 years of methods and outcomes
title_sort phragmites australis management in the united states: 40 years of methods and outcomes
topic Invited Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4038441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24790122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plu001
work_keys_str_mv AT hazeltonericlg phragmitesaustralismanagementintheunitedstates40yearsofmethodsandoutcomes
AT mozdzerthomasj phragmitesaustralismanagementintheunitedstates40yearsofmethodsandoutcomes
AT burdickdavidm phragmitesaustralismanagementintheunitedstates40yearsofmethodsandoutcomes
AT kettenringkarinm phragmitesaustralismanagementintheunitedstates40yearsofmethodsandoutcomes
AT whighamdennisf phragmitesaustralismanagementintheunitedstates40yearsofmethodsandoutcomes