Cargando…

Implementing a Complex Intervention to Support Personal Recovery: A Qualitative Study Nested within a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE: To investigate staff and trainer perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to implementing a complex intervention to help staff support the recovery of service users with a primary diagnosis of psychosis in community mental health teams. DESIGN: Process evaluation nested within a clus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leamy, Mary, Clarke, Eleanor, Le Boutillier, Clair, Bird, Victoria, Janosik, Monika, Sabas, Kai, Riley, Genevieve, Williams, Julie, Slade, Mike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4038471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24875748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097091
_version_ 1782318353165058048
author Leamy, Mary
Clarke, Eleanor
Le Boutillier, Clair
Bird, Victoria
Janosik, Monika
Sabas, Kai
Riley, Genevieve
Williams, Julie
Slade, Mike
author_facet Leamy, Mary
Clarke, Eleanor
Le Boutillier, Clair
Bird, Victoria
Janosik, Monika
Sabas, Kai
Riley, Genevieve
Williams, Julie
Slade, Mike
author_sort Leamy, Mary
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate staff and trainer perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to implementing a complex intervention to help staff support the recovery of service users with a primary diagnosis of psychosis in community mental health teams. DESIGN: Process evaluation nested within a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT). PARTICIPANTS: 28 interviews with mental health care staff, 3 interviews with trainers, 4 focus groups with intervention teams and 28 written trainer reports. SETTING: 14 community-based mental health teams in two UK sites (one urban, one semi-rural) who received the intervention. RESULTS: The factors influencing the implementation of the intervention can be organised under two over-arching themes: Organisational readiness for change and Training effectiveness. Organisational readiness for change comprised three sub-themes: NHS Trust readiness; Team readiness; and Practitioner readiness. Training effectiveness comprised three sub-themes: Engagement strategies; Delivery style and Modelling recovery principles. CONCLUSIONS: Three findings can inform future implementation and evaluation of complex interventions. First, the underlying intervention model predicted that three areas would be important for changing practice: staff skill development; intention to implement; and actual implementation behaviour. This study highlighted the importance of targeting the transition from practitioners' intent to implement to actual implementation behaviour, using experiential learning and target setting. Second, practitioners make inferences about organisational commitment by observing the allocation of resources, Knowledge Performance Indicators and service evaluation outcome measures. These need to be aligned with recovery values, principles and practice. Finally, we recommend the use of organisational readiness tools as an inclusion criteria for selecting both organisations and teams in cluster RCTs. We believe this would maximise the likelihood of adequate implementation and hence reduce waste in research expenditure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN02507940
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4038471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40384712014-06-05 Implementing a Complex Intervention to Support Personal Recovery: A Qualitative Study Nested within a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial Leamy, Mary Clarke, Eleanor Le Boutillier, Clair Bird, Victoria Janosik, Monika Sabas, Kai Riley, Genevieve Williams, Julie Slade, Mike PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate staff and trainer perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to implementing a complex intervention to help staff support the recovery of service users with a primary diagnosis of psychosis in community mental health teams. DESIGN: Process evaluation nested within a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT). PARTICIPANTS: 28 interviews with mental health care staff, 3 interviews with trainers, 4 focus groups with intervention teams and 28 written trainer reports. SETTING: 14 community-based mental health teams in two UK sites (one urban, one semi-rural) who received the intervention. RESULTS: The factors influencing the implementation of the intervention can be organised under two over-arching themes: Organisational readiness for change and Training effectiveness. Organisational readiness for change comprised three sub-themes: NHS Trust readiness; Team readiness; and Practitioner readiness. Training effectiveness comprised three sub-themes: Engagement strategies; Delivery style and Modelling recovery principles. CONCLUSIONS: Three findings can inform future implementation and evaluation of complex interventions. First, the underlying intervention model predicted that three areas would be important for changing practice: staff skill development; intention to implement; and actual implementation behaviour. This study highlighted the importance of targeting the transition from practitioners' intent to implement to actual implementation behaviour, using experiential learning and target setting. Second, practitioners make inferences about organisational commitment by observing the allocation of resources, Knowledge Performance Indicators and service evaluation outcome measures. These need to be aligned with recovery values, principles and practice. Finally, we recommend the use of organisational readiness tools as an inclusion criteria for selecting both organisations and teams in cluster RCTs. We believe this would maximise the likelihood of adequate implementation and hence reduce waste in research expenditure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN02507940 Public Library of Science 2014-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4038471/ /pubmed/24875748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097091 Text en © 2014 Leamy et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Leamy, Mary
Clarke, Eleanor
Le Boutillier, Clair
Bird, Victoria
Janosik, Monika
Sabas, Kai
Riley, Genevieve
Williams, Julie
Slade, Mike
Implementing a Complex Intervention to Support Personal Recovery: A Qualitative Study Nested within a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
title Implementing a Complex Intervention to Support Personal Recovery: A Qualitative Study Nested within a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
title_full Implementing a Complex Intervention to Support Personal Recovery: A Qualitative Study Nested within a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Implementing a Complex Intervention to Support Personal Recovery: A Qualitative Study Nested within a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Implementing a Complex Intervention to Support Personal Recovery: A Qualitative Study Nested within a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
title_short Implementing a Complex Intervention to Support Personal Recovery: A Qualitative Study Nested within a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
title_sort implementing a complex intervention to support personal recovery: a qualitative study nested within a cluster randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4038471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24875748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097091
work_keys_str_mv AT leamymary implementingacomplexinterventiontosupportpersonalrecoveryaqualitativestudynestedwithinaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT clarkeeleanor implementingacomplexinterventiontosupportpersonalrecoveryaqualitativestudynestedwithinaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT leboutillierclair implementingacomplexinterventiontosupportpersonalrecoveryaqualitativestudynestedwithinaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT birdvictoria implementingacomplexinterventiontosupportpersonalrecoveryaqualitativestudynestedwithinaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT janosikmonika implementingacomplexinterventiontosupportpersonalrecoveryaqualitativestudynestedwithinaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sabaskai implementingacomplexinterventiontosupportpersonalrecoveryaqualitativestudynestedwithinaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rileygenevieve implementingacomplexinterventiontosupportpersonalrecoveryaqualitativestudynestedwithinaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT williamsjulie implementingacomplexinterventiontosupportpersonalrecoveryaqualitativestudynestedwithinaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT slademike implementingacomplexinterventiontosupportpersonalrecoveryaqualitativestudynestedwithinaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial