Cargando…
Implementing a Complex Intervention to Support Personal Recovery: A Qualitative Study Nested within a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVE: To investigate staff and trainer perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to implementing a complex intervention to help staff support the recovery of service users with a primary diagnosis of psychosis in community mental health teams. DESIGN: Process evaluation nested within a clus...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4038471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24875748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097091 |
_version_ | 1782318353165058048 |
---|---|
author | Leamy, Mary Clarke, Eleanor Le Boutillier, Clair Bird, Victoria Janosik, Monika Sabas, Kai Riley, Genevieve Williams, Julie Slade, Mike |
author_facet | Leamy, Mary Clarke, Eleanor Le Boutillier, Clair Bird, Victoria Janosik, Monika Sabas, Kai Riley, Genevieve Williams, Julie Slade, Mike |
author_sort | Leamy, Mary |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate staff and trainer perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to implementing a complex intervention to help staff support the recovery of service users with a primary diagnosis of psychosis in community mental health teams. DESIGN: Process evaluation nested within a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT). PARTICIPANTS: 28 interviews with mental health care staff, 3 interviews with trainers, 4 focus groups with intervention teams and 28 written trainer reports. SETTING: 14 community-based mental health teams in two UK sites (one urban, one semi-rural) who received the intervention. RESULTS: The factors influencing the implementation of the intervention can be organised under two over-arching themes: Organisational readiness for change and Training effectiveness. Organisational readiness for change comprised three sub-themes: NHS Trust readiness; Team readiness; and Practitioner readiness. Training effectiveness comprised three sub-themes: Engagement strategies; Delivery style and Modelling recovery principles. CONCLUSIONS: Three findings can inform future implementation and evaluation of complex interventions. First, the underlying intervention model predicted that three areas would be important for changing practice: staff skill development; intention to implement; and actual implementation behaviour. This study highlighted the importance of targeting the transition from practitioners' intent to implement to actual implementation behaviour, using experiential learning and target setting. Second, practitioners make inferences about organisational commitment by observing the allocation of resources, Knowledge Performance Indicators and service evaluation outcome measures. These need to be aligned with recovery values, principles and practice. Finally, we recommend the use of organisational readiness tools as an inclusion criteria for selecting both organisations and teams in cluster RCTs. We believe this would maximise the likelihood of adequate implementation and hence reduce waste in research expenditure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN02507940 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4038471 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40384712014-06-05 Implementing a Complex Intervention to Support Personal Recovery: A Qualitative Study Nested within a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial Leamy, Mary Clarke, Eleanor Le Boutillier, Clair Bird, Victoria Janosik, Monika Sabas, Kai Riley, Genevieve Williams, Julie Slade, Mike PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate staff and trainer perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to implementing a complex intervention to help staff support the recovery of service users with a primary diagnosis of psychosis in community mental health teams. DESIGN: Process evaluation nested within a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT). PARTICIPANTS: 28 interviews with mental health care staff, 3 interviews with trainers, 4 focus groups with intervention teams and 28 written trainer reports. SETTING: 14 community-based mental health teams in two UK sites (one urban, one semi-rural) who received the intervention. RESULTS: The factors influencing the implementation of the intervention can be organised under two over-arching themes: Organisational readiness for change and Training effectiveness. Organisational readiness for change comprised three sub-themes: NHS Trust readiness; Team readiness; and Practitioner readiness. Training effectiveness comprised three sub-themes: Engagement strategies; Delivery style and Modelling recovery principles. CONCLUSIONS: Three findings can inform future implementation and evaluation of complex interventions. First, the underlying intervention model predicted that three areas would be important for changing practice: staff skill development; intention to implement; and actual implementation behaviour. This study highlighted the importance of targeting the transition from practitioners' intent to implement to actual implementation behaviour, using experiential learning and target setting. Second, practitioners make inferences about organisational commitment by observing the allocation of resources, Knowledge Performance Indicators and service evaluation outcome measures. These need to be aligned with recovery values, principles and practice. Finally, we recommend the use of organisational readiness tools as an inclusion criteria for selecting both organisations and teams in cluster RCTs. We believe this would maximise the likelihood of adequate implementation and hence reduce waste in research expenditure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN02507940 Public Library of Science 2014-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4038471/ /pubmed/24875748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097091 Text en © 2014 Leamy et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Leamy, Mary Clarke, Eleanor Le Boutillier, Clair Bird, Victoria Janosik, Monika Sabas, Kai Riley, Genevieve Williams, Julie Slade, Mike Implementing a Complex Intervention to Support Personal Recovery: A Qualitative Study Nested within a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial |
title | Implementing a Complex Intervention to Support Personal Recovery: A Qualitative Study Nested within a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial |
title_full | Implementing a Complex Intervention to Support Personal Recovery: A Qualitative Study Nested within a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Implementing a Complex Intervention to Support Personal Recovery: A Qualitative Study Nested within a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementing a Complex Intervention to Support Personal Recovery: A Qualitative Study Nested within a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial |
title_short | Implementing a Complex Intervention to Support Personal Recovery: A Qualitative Study Nested within a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial |
title_sort | implementing a complex intervention to support personal recovery: a qualitative study nested within a cluster randomised controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4038471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24875748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097091 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leamymary implementingacomplexinterventiontosupportpersonalrecoveryaqualitativestudynestedwithinaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT clarkeeleanor implementingacomplexinterventiontosupportpersonalrecoveryaqualitativestudynestedwithinaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT leboutillierclair implementingacomplexinterventiontosupportpersonalrecoveryaqualitativestudynestedwithinaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT birdvictoria implementingacomplexinterventiontosupportpersonalrecoveryaqualitativestudynestedwithinaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT janosikmonika implementingacomplexinterventiontosupportpersonalrecoveryaqualitativestudynestedwithinaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sabaskai implementingacomplexinterventiontosupportpersonalrecoveryaqualitativestudynestedwithinaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT rileygenevieve implementingacomplexinterventiontosupportpersonalrecoveryaqualitativestudynestedwithinaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT williamsjulie implementingacomplexinterventiontosupportpersonalrecoveryaqualitativestudynestedwithinaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT slademike implementingacomplexinterventiontosupportpersonalrecoveryaqualitativestudynestedwithinaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial |