Cargando…

Sharing Individual Participant Data from Clinical Trials: An Opinion Survey Regarding the Establishment of a Central Repository

BACKGROUND: Calls have been made for increased access to individual participant data (IPD) from clinical trials, to ensure that complete evidence is available. However, despite the obvious benefits, progress towards this is frustratingly slow. In the meantime, many systematic reviews have already co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tudur Smith, Catrin, Dwan, Kerry, Altman, Douglas G., Clarke, Mike, Riley, Richard, Williamson, Paula R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4038514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24874700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097886
_version_ 1782318360575344640
author Tudur Smith, Catrin
Dwan, Kerry
Altman, Douglas G.
Clarke, Mike
Riley, Richard
Williamson, Paula R.
author_facet Tudur Smith, Catrin
Dwan, Kerry
Altman, Douglas G.
Clarke, Mike
Riley, Richard
Williamson, Paula R.
author_sort Tudur Smith, Catrin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Calls have been made for increased access to individual participant data (IPD) from clinical trials, to ensure that complete evidence is available. However, despite the obvious benefits, progress towards this is frustratingly slow. In the meantime, many systematic reviews have already collected IPD from clinical trials. We propose that a central repository for these IPD should be established to ensure that these datasets are safeguarded and made available for use by others, building on the strengths and advantages of the collaborative groups that have been brought together in developing the datasets. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the level of support, and identify major issues, for establishing a central repository of IPD. DESIGN: On-line survey with email reminders. PARTICIPANTS: 71 reviewers affiliated with the Cochrane Collaboration's IPD Meta-analysis Methods Group were invited to participate. RESULTS: 30 (42%) invitees responded: 28 (93%) had been involved in an IPD review and 24 (80%) had been involved in a randomised trial. 25 (83%) agreed that a central repository was a good idea and 25 (83%) agreed that they would provide their IPD for central storage. Several benefits of a central repository were noted: safeguarding and standardisation of data, increased efficiency of IPD meta-analyses, knowledge advancement, and facilitating future clinical, and methodological research. The main concerns were gaining permission from trial data owners, uncertainty about the purpose of the repository, potential resource implications, and increased workload for IPD reviewers. Restricted access requiring approval, data security, anonymisation of data, and oversight committees were highlighted as issues under governance of the repository. CONCLUSION: There is support in this community of IPD reviewers, many of whom are also involved in clinical trials, for storing IPD in a central repository. Results from this survey are informing further work on developing a repository of IPD which is currently underway by our group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4038514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40385142014-06-05 Sharing Individual Participant Data from Clinical Trials: An Opinion Survey Regarding the Establishment of a Central Repository Tudur Smith, Catrin Dwan, Kerry Altman, Douglas G. Clarke, Mike Riley, Richard Williamson, Paula R. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Calls have been made for increased access to individual participant data (IPD) from clinical trials, to ensure that complete evidence is available. However, despite the obvious benefits, progress towards this is frustratingly slow. In the meantime, many systematic reviews have already collected IPD from clinical trials. We propose that a central repository for these IPD should be established to ensure that these datasets are safeguarded and made available for use by others, building on the strengths and advantages of the collaborative groups that have been brought together in developing the datasets. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the level of support, and identify major issues, for establishing a central repository of IPD. DESIGN: On-line survey with email reminders. PARTICIPANTS: 71 reviewers affiliated with the Cochrane Collaboration's IPD Meta-analysis Methods Group were invited to participate. RESULTS: 30 (42%) invitees responded: 28 (93%) had been involved in an IPD review and 24 (80%) had been involved in a randomised trial. 25 (83%) agreed that a central repository was a good idea and 25 (83%) agreed that they would provide their IPD for central storage. Several benefits of a central repository were noted: safeguarding and standardisation of data, increased efficiency of IPD meta-analyses, knowledge advancement, and facilitating future clinical, and methodological research. The main concerns were gaining permission from trial data owners, uncertainty about the purpose of the repository, potential resource implications, and increased workload for IPD reviewers. Restricted access requiring approval, data security, anonymisation of data, and oversight committees were highlighted as issues under governance of the repository. CONCLUSION: There is support in this community of IPD reviewers, many of whom are also involved in clinical trials, for storing IPD in a central repository. Results from this survey are informing further work on developing a repository of IPD which is currently underway by our group. Public Library of Science 2014-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4038514/ /pubmed/24874700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097886 Text en © 2014 Tudur Smith et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tudur Smith, Catrin
Dwan, Kerry
Altman, Douglas G.
Clarke, Mike
Riley, Richard
Williamson, Paula R.
Sharing Individual Participant Data from Clinical Trials: An Opinion Survey Regarding the Establishment of a Central Repository
title Sharing Individual Participant Data from Clinical Trials: An Opinion Survey Regarding the Establishment of a Central Repository
title_full Sharing Individual Participant Data from Clinical Trials: An Opinion Survey Regarding the Establishment of a Central Repository
title_fullStr Sharing Individual Participant Data from Clinical Trials: An Opinion Survey Regarding the Establishment of a Central Repository
title_full_unstemmed Sharing Individual Participant Data from Clinical Trials: An Opinion Survey Regarding the Establishment of a Central Repository
title_short Sharing Individual Participant Data from Clinical Trials: An Opinion Survey Regarding the Establishment of a Central Repository
title_sort sharing individual participant data from clinical trials: an opinion survey regarding the establishment of a central repository
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4038514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24874700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097886
work_keys_str_mv AT tudursmithcatrin sharingindividualparticipantdatafromclinicaltrialsanopinionsurveyregardingtheestablishmentofacentralrepository
AT dwankerry sharingindividualparticipantdatafromclinicaltrialsanopinionsurveyregardingtheestablishmentofacentralrepository
AT altmandouglasg sharingindividualparticipantdatafromclinicaltrialsanopinionsurveyregardingtheestablishmentofacentralrepository
AT clarkemike sharingindividualparticipantdatafromclinicaltrialsanopinionsurveyregardingtheestablishmentofacentralrepository
AT rileyrichard sharingindividualparticipantdatafromclinicaltrialsanopinionsurveyregardingtheestablishmentofacentralrepository
AT williamsonpaular sharingindividualparticipantdatafromclinicaltrialsanopinionsurveyregardingtheestablishmentofacentralrepository