Cargando…
Critical appraisal of RapidArc radiosurgery with flattening filter free photon beams for benign brain lesions in comparison to GammaKnife: a treatment planning study
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the role of RapidArc (RA) for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of benign brain lesions in comparison to GammaKnife (GK) based technique. METHODS: Twelve patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS, n = 6) or cavernous sinus meningioma (CSM, n = 6) were planned for both SRS using v...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4038714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24884967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-119 |
_version_ | 1782318387569885184 |
---|---|
author | Abacioglu, Ufuk Ozen, Zeynep Yilmaz, Meltem Arifoglu, Alptekin Gunhan, Basri Kayalilar, Namik Peker, Selcuk Sengoz, Meric Gurdalli, Salih Cozzi, Luca |
author_facet | Abacioglu, Ufuk Ozen, Zeynep Yilmaz, Meltem Arifoglu, Alptekin Gunhan, Basri Kayalilar, Namik Peker, Selcuk Sengoz, Meric Gurdalli, Salih Cozzi, Luca |
author_sort | Abacioglu, Ufuk |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To evaluate the role of RapidArc (RA) for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of benign brain lesions in comparison to GammaKnife (GK) based technique. METHODS: Twelve patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS, n = 6) or cavernous sinus meningioma (CSM, n = 6) were planned for both SRS using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) by RA. 104 MV flattening filter free photon beams with a maximum dose rate of 2400 MU/min were selected. Data were compared against plans optimised for GK. A single dose of 12.5 Gy was prescribed. The primary objective was to assess treatment plan quality. Secondary aim was to appraise treatment efficiency. RESULTS: For VS, comparing best GK vs. RA plans, homogeneity was 51.7 ± 3.5 vs. 6.4 ± 1.5%; Paddick conformity Index (PCI) resulted 0.81 ± 0.03 vs. 0.84 ± 0.04. Gradient index (PGI) was 2.7 ± 0.2 vs. 3.8 ± 0.6. Mean target dose was 17.1 ± 0.9 vs. 12.9 ± 0.1 Gy. For the brain stem, D(1cm3) was 5.1 ± 2.0 Gy vs 4.8 ± 1.6 Gy. For the ipsilateral cochlea, D(0.1cm3) was 1.7 ± 1.0 Gy vs. 1.8 ± 0.5 Gy. For CSM, homogeneity was 52.3 ± 2.4 vs. 12.4 ± 0.6; PCI: 0.86 ± 0.05 vs. 0.88 ± 0.05; PGI: 2.6 ± 0.1 vs. 3.8 ± 0.5; D(1cm3) to brain stem was 5.4 ± 2.8 Gy vs. 5.2 ± 2.8 Gy; D(0.1cm3) to ipsi-lateral optic nerve was 4.2 ± 2.1 vs. 2.1 ± 1.5 Gy; D(0.1cm3) to optic chiasm was 5.9 ± 3.1 vs. 4.5 ± 2.1 Gy. Treatment time was 53.7 ± 5.8 (64.9 ± 24.3) minutes for GK and 4.8 ± 1.3 (5.0 ± 0.7) minutes for RA for schwannomas (meningiomas). CONCLUSIONS: SRS with RA and FFF beams revealed to be adequate and comparable to GK in terms of target coverage, homogeneity, organs at risk sparing with some gain in terms of treatment efficiency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4038714 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40387142014-05-31 Critical appraisal of RapidArc radiosurgery with flattening filter free photon beams for benign brain lesions in comparison to GammaKnife: a treatment planning study Abacioglu, Ufuk Ozen, Zeynep Yilmaz, Meltem Arifoglu, Alptekin Gunhan, Basri Kayalilar, Namik Peker, Selcuk Sengoz, Meric Gurdalli, Salih Cozzi, Luca Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate the role of RapidArc (RA) for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of benign brain lesions in comparison to GammaKnife (GK) based technique. METHODS: Twelve patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS, n = 6) or cavernous sinus meningioma (CSM, n = 6) were planned for both SRS using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) by RA. 104 MV flattening filter free photon beams with a maximum dose rate of 2400 MU/min were selected. Data were compared against plans optimised for GK. A single dose of 12.5 Gy was prescribed. The primary objective was to assess treatment plan quality. Secondary aim was to appraise treatment efficiency. RESULTS: For VS, comparing best GK vs. RA plans, homogeneity was 51.7 ± 3.5 vs. 6.4 ± 1.5%; Paddick conformity Index (PCI) resulted 0.81 ± 0.03 vs. 0.84 ± 0.04. Gradient index (PGI) was 2.7 ± 0.2 vs. 3.8 ± 0.6. Mean target dose was 17.1 ± 0.9 vs. 12.9 ± 0.1 Gy. For the brain stem, D(1cm3) was 5.1 ± 2.0 Gy vs 4.8 ± 1.6 Gy. For the ipsilateral cochlea, D(0.1cm3) was 1.7 ± 1.0 Gy vs. 1.8 ± 0.5 Gy. For CSM, homogeneity was 52.3 ± 2.4 vs. 12.4 ± 0.6; PCI: 0.86 ± 0.05 vs. 0.88 ± 0.05; PGI: 2.6 ± 0.1 vs. 3.8 ± 0.5; D(1cm3) to brain stem was 5.4 ± 2.8 Gy vs. 5.2 ± 2.8 Gy; D(0.1cm3) to ipsi-lateral optic nerve was 4.2 ± 2.1 vs. 2.1 ± 1.5 Gy; D(0.1cm3) to optic chiasm was 5.9 ± 3.1 vs. 4.5 ± 2.1 Gy. Treatment time was 53.7 ± 5.8 (64.9 ± 24.3) minutes for GK and 4.8 ± 1.3 (5.0 ± 0.7) minutes for RA for schwannomas (meningiomas). CONCLUSIONS: SRS with RA and FFF beams revealed to be adequate and comparable to GK in terms of target coverage, homogeneity, organs at risk sparing with some gain in terms of treatment efficiency. BioMed Central 2014-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4038714/ /pubmed/24884967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-119 Text en Copyright © 2014 Abacioglu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Abacioglu, Ufuk Ozen, Zeynep Yilmaz, Meltem Arifoglu, Alptekin Gunhan, Basri Kayalilar, Namik Peker, Selcuk Sengoz, Meric Gurdalli, Salih Cozzi, Luca Critical appraisal of RapidArc radiosurgery with flattening filter free photon beams for benign brain lesions in comparison to GammaKnife: a treatment planning study |
title | Critical appraisal of RapidArc radiosurgery with flattening filter free photon beams for benign brain lesions in comparison to GammaKnife: a treatment planning study |
title_full | Critical appraisal of RapidArc radiosurgery with flattening filter free photon beams for benign brain lesions in comparison to GammaKnife: a treatment planning study |
title_fullStr | Critical appraisal of RapidArc radiosurgery with flattening filter free photon beams for benign brain lesions in comparison to GammaKnife: a treatment planning study |
title_full_unstemmed | Critical appraisal of RapidArc radiosurgery with flattening filter free photon beams for benign brain lesions in comparison to GammaKnife: a treatment planning study |
title_short | Critical appraisal of RapidArc radiosurgery with flattening filter free photon beams for benign brain lesions in comparison to GammaKnife: a treatment planning study |
title_sort | critical appraisal of rapidarc radiosurgery with flattening filter free photon beams for benign brain lesions in comparison to gammaknife: a treatment planning study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4038714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24884967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abaciogluufuk criticalappraisalofrapidarcradiosurgerywithflatteningfilterfreephotonbeamsforbenignbrainlesionsincomparisontogammaknifeatreatmentplanningstudy AT ozenzeynep criticalappraisalofrapidarcradiosurgerywithflatteningfilterfreephotonbeamsforbenignbrainlesionsincomparisontogammaknifeatreatmentplanningstudy AT yilmazmeltem criticalappraisalofrapidarcradiosurgerywithflatteningfilterfreephotonbeamsforbenignbrainlesionsincomparisontogammaknifeatreatmentplanningstudy AT arifoglualptekin criticalappraisalofrapidarcradiosurgerywithflatteningfilterfreephotonbeamsforbenignbrainlesionsincomparisontogammaknifeatreatmentplanningstudy AT gunhanbasri criticalappraisalofrapidarcradiosurgerywithflatteningfilterfreephotonbeamsforbenignbrainlesionsincomparisontogammaknifeatreatmentplanningstudy AT kayalilarnamik criticalappraisalofrapidarcradiosurgerywithflatteningfilterfreephotonbeamsforbenignbrainlesionsincomparisontogammaknifeatreatmentplanningstudy AT pekerselcuk criticalappraisalofrapidarcradiosurgerywithflatteningfilterfreephotonbeamsforbenignbrainlesionsincomparisontogammaknifeatreatmentplanningstudy AT sengozmeric criticalappraisalofrapidarcradiosurgerywithflatteningfilterfreephotonbeamsforbenignbrainlesionsincomparisontogammaknifeatreatmentplanningstudy AT gurdallisalih criticalappraisalofrapidarcradiosurgerywithflatteningfilterfreephotonbeamsforbenignbrainlesionsincomparisontogammaknifeatreatmentplanningstudy AT cozziluca criticalappraisalofrapidarcradiosurgerywithflatteningfilterfreephotonbeamsforbenignbrainlesionsincomparisontogammaknifeatreatmentplanningstudy |