Cargando…

Critical appraisal of RapidArc radiosurgery with flattening filter free photon beams for benign brain lesions in comparison to GammaKnife: a treatment planning study

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the role of RapidArc (RA) for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of benign brain lesions in comparison to GammaKnife (GK) based technique. METHODS: Twelve patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS, n = 6) or cavernous sinus meningioma (CSM, n = 6) were planned for both SRS using v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abacioglu, Ufuk, Ozen, Zeynep, Yilmaz, Meltem, Arifoglu, Alptekin, Gunhan, Basri, Kayalilar, Namik, Peker, Selcuk, Sengoz, Meric, Gurdalli, Salih, Cozzi, Luca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4038714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24884967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-119
_version_ 1782318387569885184
author Abacioglu, Ufuk
Ozen, Zeynep
Yilmaz, Meltem
Arifoglu, Alptekin
Gunhan, Basri
Kayalilar, Namik
Peker, Selcuk
Sengoz, Meric
Gurdalli, Salih
Cozzi, Luca
author_facet Abacioglu, Ufuk
Ozen, Zeynep
Yilmaz, Meltem
Arifoglu, Alptekin
Gunhan, Basri
Kayalilar, Namik
Peker, Selcuk
Sengoz, Meric
Gurdalli, Salih
Cozzi, Luca
author_sort Abacioglu, Ufuk
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the role of RapidArc (RA) for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of benign brain lesions in comparison to GammaKnife (GK) based technique. METHODS: Twelve patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS, n = 6) or cavernous sinus meningioma (CSM, n = 6) were planned for both SRS using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) by RA. 104 MV flattening filter free photon beams with a maximum dose rate of 2400 MU/min were selected. Data were compared against plans optimised for GK. A single dose of 12.5 Gy was prescribed. The primary objective was to assess treatment plan quality. Secondary aim was to appraise treatment efficiency. RESULTS: For VS, comparing best GK vs. RA plans, homogeneity was 51.7 ± 3.5 vs. 6.4 ± 1.5%; Paddick conformity Index (PCI) resulted 0.81 ± 0.03 vs. 0.84 ± 0.04. Gradient index (PGI) was 2.7 ± 0.2 vs. 3.8 ± 0.6. Mean target dose was 17.1 ± 0.9 vs. 12.9 ± 0.1 Gy. For the brain stem, D(1cm3) was 5.1 ± 2.0 Gy vs 4.8 ± 1.6 Gy. For the ipsilateral cochlea, D(0.1cm3) was 1.7 ± 1.0 Gy vs. 1.8 ± 0.5 Gy. For CSM, homogeneity was 52.3 ± 2.4 vs. 12.4 ± 0.6; PCI: 0.86 ± 0.05 vs. 0.88 ± 0.05; PGI: 2.6 ± 0.1 vs. 3.8 ± 0.5; D(1cm3) to brain stem was 5.4 ± 2.8 Gy vs. 5.2 ± 2.8 Gy; D(0.1cm3) to ipsi-lateral optic nerve was 4.2 ± 2.1 vs. 2.1 ± 1.5 Gy; D(0.1cm3) to optic chiasm was 5.9 ± 3.1 vs. 4.5 ± 2.1 Gy. Treatment time was 53.7 ± 5.8 (64.9 ± 24.3) minutes for GK and 4.8 ± 1.3 (5.0 ± 0.7) minutes for RA for schwannomas (meningiomas). CONCLUSIONS: SRS with RA and FFF beams revealed to be adequate and comparable to GK in terms of target coverage, homogeneity, organs at risk sparing with some gain in terms of treatment efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4038714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40387142014-05-31 Critical appraisal of RapidArc radiosurgery with flattening filter free photon beams for benign brain lesions in comparison to GammaKnife: a treatment planning study Abacioglu, Ufuk Ozen, Zeynep Yilmaz, Meltem Arifoglu, Alptekin Gunhan, Basri Kayalilar, Namik Peker, Selcuk Sengoz, Meric Gurdalli, Salih Cozzi, Luca Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate the role of RapidArc (RA) for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of benign brain lesions in comparison to GammaKnife (GK) based technique. METHODS: Twelve patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS, n = 6) or cavernous sinus meningioma (CSM, n = 6) were planned for both SRS using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) by RA. 104 MV flattening filter free photon beams with a maximum dose rate of 2400 MU/min were selected. Data were compared against plans optimised for GK. A single dose of 12.5 Gy was prescribed. The primary objective was to assess treatment plan quality. Secondary aim was to appraise treatment efficiency. RESULTS: For VS, comparing best GK vs. RA plans, homogeneity was 51.7 ± 3.5 vs. 6.4 ± 1.5%; Paddick conformity Index (PCI) resulted 0.81 ± 0.03 vs. 0.84 ± 0.04. Gradient index (PGI) was 2.7 ± 0.2 vs. 3.8 ± 0.6. Mean target dose was 17.1 ± 0.9 vs. 12.9 ± 0.1 Gy. For the brain stem, D(1cm3) was 5.1 ± 2.0 Gy vs 4.8 ± 1.6 Gy. For the ipsilateral cochlea, D(0.1cm3) was 1.7 ± 1.0 Gy vs. 1.8 ± 0.5 Gy. For CSM, homogeneity was 52.3 ± 2.4 vs. 12.4 ± 0.6; PCI: 0.86 ± 0.05 vs. 0.88 ± 0.05; PGI: 2.6 ± 0.1 vs. 3.8 ± 0.5; D(1cm3) to brain stem was 5.4 ± 2.8 Gy vs. 5.2 ± 2.8 Gy; D(0.1cm3) to ipsi-lateral optic nerve was 4.2 ± 2.1 vs. 2.1 ± 1.5 Gy; D(0.1cm3) to optic chiasm was 5.9 ± 3.1 vs. 4.5 ± 2.1 Gy. Treatment time was 53.7 ± 5.8 (64.9 ± 24.3) minutes for GK and 4.8 ± 1.3 (5.0 ± 0.7) minutes for RA for schwannomas (meningiomas). CONCLUSIONS: SRS with RA and FFF beams revealed to be adequate and comparable to GK in terms of target coverage, homogeneity, organs at risk sparing with some gain in terms of treatment efficiency. BioMed Central 2014-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4038714/ /pubmed/24884967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-119 Text en Copyright © 2014 Abacioglu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Abacioglu, Ufuk
Ozen, Zeynep
Yilmaz, Meltem
Arifoglu, Alptekin
Gunhan, Basri
Kayalilar, Namik
Peker, Selcuk
Sengoz, Meric
Gurdalli, Salih
Cozzi, Luca
Critical appraisal of RapidArc radiosurgery with flattening filter free photon beams for benign brain lesions in comparison to GammaKnife: a treatment planning study
title Critical appraisal of RapidArc radiosurgery with flattening filter free photon beams for benign brain lesions in comparison to GammaKnife: a treatment planning study
title_full Critical appraisal of RapidArc radiosurgery with flattening filter free photon beams for benign brain lesions in comparison to GammaKnife: a treatment planning study
title_fullStr Critical appraisal of RapidArc radiosurgery with flattening filter free photon beams for benign brain lesions in comparison to GammaKnife: a treatment planning study
title_full_unstemmed Critical appraisal of RapidArc radiosurgery with flattening filter free photon beams for benign brain lesions in comparison to GammaKnife: a treatment planning study
title_short Critical appraisal of RapidArc radiosurgery with flattening filter free photon beams for benign brain lesions in comparison to GammaKnife: a treatment planning study
title_sort critical appraisal of rapidarc radiosurgery with flattening filter free photon beams for benign brain lesions in comparison to gammaknife: a treatment planning study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4038714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24884967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-119
work_keys_str_mv AT abaciogluufuk criticalappraisalofrapidarcradiosurgerywithflatteningfilterfreephotonbeamsforbenignbrainlesionsincomparisontogammaknifeatreatmentplanningstudy
AT ozenzeynep criticalappraisalofrapidarcradiosurgerywithflatteningfilterfreephotonbeamsforbenignbrainlesionsincomparisontogammaknifeatreatmentplanningstudy
AT yilmazmeltem criticalappraisalofrapidarcradiosurgerywithflatteningfilterfreephotonbeamsforbenignbrainlesionsincomparisontogammaknifeatreatmentplanningstudy
AT arifoglualptekin criticalappraisalofrapidarcradiosurgerywithflatteningfilterfreephotonbeamsforbenignbrainlesionsincomparisontogammaknifeatreatmentplanningstudy
AT gunhanbasri criticalappraisalofrapidarcradiosurgerywithflatteningfilterfreephotonbeamsforbenignbrainlesionsincomparisontogammaknifeatreatmentplanningstudy
AT kayalilarnamik criticalappraisalofrapidarcradiosurgerywithflatteningfilterfreephotonbeamsforbenignbrainlesionsincomparisontogammaknifeatreatmentplanningstudy
AT pekerselcuk criticalappraisalofrapidarcradiosurgerywithflatteningfilterfreephotonbeamsforbenignbrainlesionsincomparisontogammaknifeatreatmentplanningstudy
AT sengozmeric criticalappraisalofrapidarcradiosurgerywithflatteningfilterfreephotonbeamsforbenignbrainlesionsincomparisontogammaknifeatreatmentplanningstudy
AT gurdallisalih criticalappraisalofrapidarcradiosurgerywithflatteningfilterfreephotonbeamsforbenignbrainlesionsincomparisontogammaknifeatreatmentplanningstudy
AT cozziluca criticalappraisalofrapidarcradiosurgerywithflatteningfilterfreephotonbeamsforbenignbrainlesionsincomparisontogammaknifeatreatmentplanningstudy