Cargando…

Use of pipeline flow diverting stents for wide neck intracranial aneurysms: A retrospective institutional review

BACKGROUND: Intracranial aneurysms (ICA) if inadequately treated may result in serious morbidity and mortality. Wide-neck; large/giant, fusiform, and dissecting aneurysms are not well treated using the conventional coil embolization technique. Recent advance in endovascular treatment and technology...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agarwal, Abhishek, Gokhale, Sankalp, Gupta, Jagan, Raju, Roman, Nimjee, Shahid, Smith, Tony, Britz, Gavin W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4038863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24891883
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.131057
_version_ 1782318414393507840
author Agarwal, Abhishek
Gokhale, Sankalp
Gupta, Jagan
Raju, Roman
Nimjee, Shahid
Smith, Tony
Britz, Gavin W.
author_facet Agarwal, Abhishek
Gokhale, Sankalp
Gupta, Jagan
Raju, Roman
Nimjee, Shahid
Smith, Tony
Britz, Gavin W.
author_sort Agarwal, Abhishek
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intracranial aneurysms (ICA) if inadequately treated may result in serious morbidity and mortality. Wide-neck; large/giant, fusiform, and dissecting aneurysms are not well treated using the conventional coil embolization technique. Recent advance in endovascular treatment and technology has introduced flow diverter devices including pipeline embolization devices (PED) and Silk stents that have been shown to be more effective in treating these more complicated aneurysms. Flow Diverter devices offer a more physiologic approach to ICA treatment. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 23 adult patients who underwent aneurysm treatment utilizing the pipeline stent at Duke University Medical Center from July 2011 to March 2013. RESULTS: Majority of patients (19, 82.7%) showed angiographic evidence of complete obliteration of aneurysm at 6 months follow-up, with sustained clinical improvement on modified Rankin scale score. All of the patients tolerated the procedure well with no intra-operative hemorrhage or intra-operative thromboembolic complications. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that use of PED offers a safe and effective strategy for treatment of complex ICA. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these observations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4038863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40388632014-06-02 Use of pipeline flow diverting stents for wide neck intracranial aneurysms: A retrospective institutional review Agarwal, Abhishek Gokhale, Sankalp Gupta, Jagan Raju, Roman Nimjee, Shahid Smith, Tony Britz, Gavin W. Asian J Neurosurg Editor's Choice BACKGROUND: Intracranial aneurysms (ICA) if inadequately treated may result in serious morbidity and mortality. Wide-neck; large/giant, fusiform, and dissecting aneurysms are not well treated using the conventional coil embolization technique. Recent advance in endovascular treatment and technology has introduced flow diverter devices including pipeline embolization devices (PED) and Silk stents that have been shown to be more effective in treating these more complicated aneurysms. Flow Diverter devices offer a more physiologic approach to ICA treatment. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 23 adult patients who underwent aneurysm treatment utilizing the pipeline stent at Duke University Medical Center from July 2011 to March 2013. RESULTS: Majority of patients (19, 82.7%) showed angiographic evidence of complete obliteration of aneurysm at 6 months follow-up, with sustained clinical improvement on modified Rankin scale score. All of the patients tolerated the procedure well with no intra-operative hemorrhage or intra-operative thromboembolic complications. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that use of PED offers a safe and effective strategy for treatment of complex ICA. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these observations. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4038863/ /pubmed/24891883 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.131057 Text en Copyright: © Asian Journal of Neurosurgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Editor's Choice
Agarwal, Abhishek
Gokhale, Sankalp
Gupta, Jagan
Raju, Roman
Nimjee, Shahid
Smith, Tony
Britz, Gavin W.
Use of pipeline flow diverting stents for wide neck intracranial aneurysms: A retrospective institutional review
title Use of pipeline flow diverting stents for wide neck intracranial aneurysms: A retrospective institutional review
title_full Use of pipeline flow diverting stents for wide neck intracranial aneurysms: A retrospective institutional review
title_fullStr Use of pipeline flow diverting stents for wide neck intracranial aneurysms: A retrospective institutional review
title_full_unstemmed Use of pipeline flow diverting stents for wide neck intracranial aneurysms: A retrospective institutional review
title_short Use of pipeline flow diverting stents for wide neck intracranial aneurysms: A retrospective institutional review
title_sort use of pipeline flow diverting stents for wide neck intracranial aneurysms: a retrospective institutional review
topic Editor's Choice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4038863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24891883
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.131057
work_keys_str_mv AT agarwalabhishek useofpipelineflowdivertingstentsforwideneckintracranialaneurysmsaretrospectiveinstitutionalreview
AT gokhalesankalp useofpipelineflowdivertingstentsforwideneckintracranialaneurysmsaretrospectiveinstitutionalreview
AT guptajagan useofpipelineflowdivertingstentsforwideneckintracranialaneurysmsaretrospectiveinstitutionalreview
AT rajuroman useofpipelineflowdivertingstentsforwideneckintracranialaneurysmsaretrospectiveinstitutionalreview
AT nimjeeshahid useofpipelineflowdivertingstentsforwideneckintracranialaneurysmsaretrospectiveinstitutionalreview
AT smithtony useofpipelineflowdivertingstentsforwideneckintracranialaneurysmsaretrospectiveinstitutionalreview
AT britzgavinw useofpipelineflowdivertingstentsforwideneckintracranialaneurysmsaretrospectiveinstitutionalreview