Cargando…
Six weeks of home enteral nutrition versus standard care after esophagectomy or total gastrectomy for cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Each year approximately 3000 patients in the United Kingdom undergo surgery for esophagogastric cancer. Jejunostomy feeding tubes, placed at the time of surgery for early postoperative nutrition, have been shown to have a positive impact on clinical outcomes in the short term. Whether fe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4039309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-187 |
_version_ | 1782318466848522240 |
---|---|
author | Bowrey, David J Baker, Melanie Halliday, Vanessa Thomas, Anne L Pulikottil-Jacob, Ruth Smith, Karen |
author_facet | Bowrey, David J Baker, Melanie Halliday, Vanessa Thomas, Anne L Pulikottil-Jacob, Ruth Smith, Karen |
author_sort | Bowrey, David J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Each year approximately 3000 patients in the United Kingdom undergo surgery for esophagogastric cancer. Jejunostomy feeding tubes, placed at the time of surgery for early postoperative nutrition, have been shown to have a positive impact on clinical outcomes in the short term. Whether feeding out of hospital is of benefit is unknown. Local experience has identified that between 15 and 20% of patients required ‘rescue’ jejunostomy feeding for nutritional problems and weight loss while at home. This weight loss and poor nutrition may contribute to the detrimental effect on the overall quality of life (QoL) reported in these patients. METHODS/DESIGN: This randomized pilot and feasibility study will provide preliminary information on the routine use of jejunostomy feeding after hospital discharge in terms of clinical benefits and QoL. Sixty participants undergoing esophagectomy or total gastrectomy will be randomized to receive either a planned program of six weeks of home jejunostomy feeding after discharge from hospital (intervention) or treatment-as-usual (control). The intention of this study is to inform a multi-centre randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome measures will be recruitment and retention rates at six weeks and six months. Secondary outcome measures will include disease specific and general QoL measures, nutritional parameters, total and oral nutritional intake, hospital readmission rates, and estimates of healthcare costs. Up to 20 participants will also be enrolled in a qualitative sub-study that will explore participants’ and carers’ experiences of home tube feeding. The results will be disseminated by presentation at surgical, gastroenterological and dietetic meetings and publication in appropriate peer review journals. A patient-friendly lay summary will be made available on the University of Leicester and the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust websites. The study has full ethical and institutional approval and started recruitment in July 2012. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UKClinical Research Network ID #12447 (Main study); UKCRN ID#13361 (Qualitative sub study); ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01870817 (First registered 28 May 2013) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4039309 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40393092014-05-31 Six weeks of home enteral nutrition versus standard care after esophagectomy or total gastrectomy for cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Bowrey, David J Baker, Melanie Halliday, Vanessa Thomas, Anne L Pulikottil-Jacob, Ruth Smith, Karen Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Each year approximately 3000 patients in the United Kingdom undergo surgery for esophagogastric cancer. Jejunostomy feeding tubes, placed at the time of surgery for early postoperative nutrition, have been shown to have a positive impact on clinical outcomes in the short term. Whether feeding out of hospital is of benefit is unknown. Local experience has identified that between 15 and 20% of patients required ‘rescue’ jejunostomy feeding for nutritional problems and weight loss while at home. This weight loss and poor nutrition may contribute to the detrimental effect on the overall quality of life (QoL) reported in these patients. METHODS/DESIGN: This randomized pilot and feasibility study will provide preliminary information on the routine use of jejunostomy feeding after hospital discharge in terms of clinical benefits and QoL. Sixty participants undergoing esophagectomy or total gastrectomy will be randomized to receive either a planned program of six weeks of home jejunostomy feeding after discharge from hospital (intervention) or treatment-as-usual (control). The intention of this study is to inform a multi-centre randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome measures will be recruitment and retention rates at six weeks and six months. Secondary outcome measures will include disease specific and general QoL measures, nutritional parameters, total and oral nutritional intake, hospital readmission rates, and estimates of healthcare costs. Up to 20 participants will also be enrolled in a qualitative sub-study that will explore participants’ and carers’ experiences of home tube feeding. The results will be disseminated by presentation at surgical, gastroenterological and dietetic meetings and publication in appropriate peer review journals. A patient-friendly lay summary will be made available on the University of Leicester and the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust websites. The study has full ethical and institutional approval and started recruitment in July 2012. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UKClinical Research Network ID #12447 (Main study); UKCRN ID#13361 (Qualitative sub study); ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01870817 (First registered 28 May 2013) BioMed Central 2014-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4039309/ /pubmed/24885032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-187 Text en Copyright © 2014 Bowrey et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Bowrey, David J Baker, Melanie Halliday, Vanessa Thomas, Anne L Pulikottil-Jacob, Ruth Smith, Karen Six weeks of home enteral nutrition versus standard care after esophagectomy or total gastrectomy for cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Six weeks of home enteral nutrition versus standard care after esophagectomy or total gastrectomy for cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Six weeks of home enteral nutrition versus standard care after esophagectomy or total gastrectomy for cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Six weeks of home enteral nutrition versus standard care after esophagectomy or total gastrectomy for cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Six weeks of home enteral nutrition versus standard care after esophagectomy or total gastrectomy for cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Six weeks of home enteral nutrition versus standard care after esophagectomy or total gastrectomy for cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | six weeks of home enteral nutrition versus standard care after esophagectomy or total gastrectomy for cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4039309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-187 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bowreydavidj sixweeksofhomeenteralnutritionversusstandardcareafteresophagectomyortotalgastrectomyforcancerstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bakermelanie sixweeksofhomeenteralnutritionversusstandardcareafteresophagectomyortotalgastrectomyforcancerstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hallidayvanessa sixweeksofhomeenteralnutritionversusstandardcareafteresophagectomyortotalgastrectomyforcancerstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT thomasannel sixweeksofhomeenteralnutritionversusstandardcareafteresophagectomyortotalgastrectomyforcancerstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pulikottiljacobruth sixweeksofhomeenteralnutritionversusstandardcareafteresophagectomyortotalgastrectomyforcancerstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT smithkaren sixweeksofhomeenteralnutritionversusstandardcareafteresophagectomyortotalgastrectomyforcancerstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |