Cargando…
Comparison of the ultra-low-dose Veo algorithm with the gold standard filtered back projection for detecting pulmonary asbestos-related conditions: a clinical observational study
OBJECTIVES: Radiation delivered during CT is a major concern, especially for individuals undergoing repeated screening. We aimed to compare a new ultra-low-dose algorithm called Veo with the gold standard filtered back projection (FBP) for detecting pulmonary asbestos-related conditions. SETTING: Un...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4039784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24879827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004980 |
_version_ | 1782318517576531968 |
---|---|
author | Tekath, Marielle Dutheil, Frédéric Bellini, Romain Roche, Antoine Pereira, Bruno Naughton, Geraldine Chamoux, Alain Michel, Jean-Luc |
author_facet | Tekath, Marielle Dutheil, Frédéric Bellini, Romain Roche, Antoine Pereira, Bruno Naughton, Geraldine Chamoux, Alain Michel, Jean-Luc |
author_sort | Tekath, Marielle |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Radiation delivered during CT is a major concern, especially for individuals undergoing repeated screening. We aimed to compare a new ultra-low-dose algorithm called Veo with the gold standard filtered back projection (FBP) for detecting pulmonary asbestos-related conditions. SETTING: University Hospital CHU G. Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France PARTICIPANTS: Asbestos-exposed workers were recruited following referral to screening for asbestos-related conditions. Two acquisitions were performed on a 64-slice CT: the gold standard FBP followed by Veo reconstruction. OUTCOME MEASURES: Two radiologists independently assessed asbestos-related abnormalities, pulmonary nodules, radiation doses and image quality (noise). RESULTS: We included 27 asbestos-exposed workers (63.3±6.5 years with 11.9±9.7 years of asbestos exposure). We observed 297 pleural plaques in 20 participants (74%). All patients (100%) had pulmonary nodules, totalling 167 nodules. Detection rates did not differ for pleural plaques (Veo 87% vs FBP 97%, NS), pleural thickening (100% for both) and pulmonary nodules (80% for both). Interstitial abnormalities were depicted less frequently with Veo than FBP. False negative and false positive did not exceed 2.7%. Compared with FBP, Veo decreased the radiation dose up to 87% (Veo 0.23±0.07 vs FBP 1.83±0.88 mSv, p<0.001). The objective image noise also decreased with Veo as much as 23% and signal-to-noise ratio increased up to 33%. CONCLUSIONS: A low-dose CT with Veo reconstruction substantially reduced radiation. Veo compared favourably with FBP in detecting pleural plaques, pleural thickening and pulmonary nodules. These results should be confirmed on a larger sample size before the use of Veo in clinical routine practice in asbestos-related conditions, especially regarding the low prevalence of interstitial abnormalities in this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01955018. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4039784 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40397842014-06-02 Comparison of the ultra-low-dose Veo algorithm with the gold standard filtered back projection for detecting pulmonary asbestos-related conditions: a clinical observational study Tekath, Marielle Dutheil, Frédéric Bellini, Romain Roche, Antoine Pereira, Bruno Naughton, Geraldine Chamoux, Alain Michel, Jean-Luc BMJ Open Occupational and Environmental Medicine OBJECTIVES: Radiation delivered during CT is a major concern, especially for individuals undergoing repeated screening. We aimed to compare a new ultra-low-dose algorithm called Veo with the gold standard filtered back projection (FBP) for detecting pulmonary asbestos-related conditions. SETTING: University Hospital CHU G. Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France PARTICIPANTS: Asbestos-exposed workers were recruited following referral to screening for asbestos-related conditions. Two acquisitions were performed on a 64-slice CT: the gold standard FBP followed by Veo reconstruction. OUTCOME MEASURES: Two radiologists independently assessed asbestos-related abnormalities, pulmonary nodules, radiation doses and image quality (noise). RESULTS: We included 27 asbestos-exposed workers (63.3±6.5 years with 11.9±9.7 years of asbestos exposure). We observed 297 pleural plaques in 20 participants (74%). All patients (100%) had pulmonary nodules, totalling 167 nodules. Detection rates did not differ for pleural plaques (Veo 87% vs FBP 97%, NS), pleural thickening (100% for both) and pulmonary nodules (80% for both). Interstitial abnormalities were depicted less frequently with Veo than FBP. False negative and false positive did not exceed 2.7%. Compared with FBP, Veo decreased the radiation dose up to 87% (Veo 0.23±0.07 vs FBP 1.83±0.88 mSv, p<0.001). The objective image noise also decreased with Veo as much as 23% and signal-to-noise ratio increased up to 33%. CONCLUSIONS: A low-dose CT with Veo reconstruction substantially reduced radiation. Veo compared favourably with FBP in detecting pleural plaques, pleural thickening and pulmonary nodules. These results should be confirmed on a larger sample size before the use of Veo in clinical routine practice in asbestos-related conditions, especially regarding the low prevalence of interstitial abnormalities in this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01955018. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4039784/ /pubmed/24879827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004980 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Occupational and Environmental Medicine Tekath, Marielle Dutheil, Frédéric Bellini, Romain Roche, Antoine Pereira, Bruno Naughton, Geraldine Chamoux, Alain Michel, Jean-Luc Comparison of the ultra-low-dose Veo algorithm with the gold standard filtered back projection for detecting pulmonary asbestos-related conditions: a clinical observational study |
title | Comparison of the ultra-low-dose Veo algorithm with the gold standard filtered back projection for detecting pulmonary asbestos-related conditions: a clinical observational study |
title_full | Comparison of the ultra-low-dose Veo algorithm with the gold standard filtered back projection for detecting pulmonary asbestos-related conditions: a clinical observational study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the ultra-low-dose Veo algorithm with the gold standard filtered back projection for detecting pulmonary asbestos-related conditions: a clinical observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the ultra-low-dose Veo algorithm with the gold standard filtered back projection for detecting pulmonary asbestos-related conditions: a clinical observational study |
title_short | Comparison of the ultra-low-dose Veo algorithm with the gold standard filtered back projection for detecting pulmonary asbestos-related conditions: a clinical observational study |
title_sort | comparison of the ultra-low-dose veo algorithm with the gold standard filtered back projection for detecting pulmonary asbestos-related conditions: a clinical observational study |
topic | Occupational and Environmental Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4039784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24879827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004980 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tekathmarielle comparisonoftheultralowdoseveoalgorithmwiththegoldstandardfilteredbackprojectionfordetectingpulmonaryasbestosrelatedconditionsaclinicalobservationalstudy AT dutheilfrederic comparisonoftheultralowdoseveoalgorithmwiththegoldstandardfilteredbackprojectionfordetectingpulmonaryasbestosrelatedconditionsaclinicalobservationalstudy AT belliniromain comparisonoftheultralowdoseveoalgorithmwiththegoldstandardfilteredbackprojectionfordetectingpulmonaryasbestosrelatedconditionsaclinicalobservationalstudy AT rocheantoine comparisonoftheultralowdoseveoalgorithmwiththegoldstandardfilteredbackprojectionfordetectingpulmonaryasbestosrelatedconditionsaclinicalobservationalstudy AT pereirabruno comparisonoftheultralowdoseveoalgorithmwiththegoldstandardfilteredbackprojectionfordetectingpulmonaryasbestosrelatedconditionsaclinicalobservationalstudy AT naughtongeraldine comparisonoftheultralowdoseveoalgorithmwiththegoldstandardfilteredbackprojectionfordetectingpulmonaryasbestosrelatedconditionsaclinicalobservationalstudy AT chamouxalain comparisonoftheultralowdoseveoalgorithmwiththegoldstandardfilteredbackprojectionfordetectingpulmonaryasbestosrelatedconditionsaclinicalobservationalstudy AT micheljeanluc comparisonoftheultralowdoseveoalgorithmwiththegoldstandardfilteredbackprojectionfordetectingpulmonaryasbestosrelatedconditionsaclinicalobservationalstudy |