Cargando…
Patient satisfaction with in-centre haemodialysis care: an international survey
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate patient experiences of specific aspects of haemodialysis care across several countries. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey using the Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for End-Stage Renal Disease (CHOICE) questionnaire. SETTING: Haemodialysis clinics within a single provider...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4039823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24840250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005020 |
_version_ | 1782318521982648320 |
---|---|
author | Palmer, Suetonia C de Berardis, Giorgia Craig, Jonathan C Tong, Allison Tonelli, Marcello Pellegrini, Fabio Ruospo, Marinella Hegbrant, Jörgen Wollheim, Charlotta Celia, Eduardo Gelfman, Ruben Ferrari, Juan Nin Törok, Marietta Murgo, Marco Leal, Miguel Bednarek-Skublewska, Anna Dulawa, Jan Strippoli, Giovanni F M |
author_facet | Palmer, Suetonia C de Berardis, Giorgia Craig, Jonathan C Tong, Allison Tonelli, Marcello Pellegrini, Fabio Ruospo, Marinella Hegbrant, Jörgen Wollheim, Charlotta Celia, Eduardo Gelfman, Ruben Ferrari, Juan Nin Törok, Marietta Murgo, Marco Leal, Miguel Bednarek-Skublewska, Anna Dulawa, Jan Strippoli, Giovanni F M |
author_sort | Palmer, Suetonia C |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate patient experiences of specific aspects of haemodialysis care across several countries. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey using the Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for End-Stage Renal Disease (CHOICE) questionnaire. SETTING: Haemodialysis clinics within a single provider in Europe and South America. PARTICIPANTS: 2748 adults treated in haemodialysis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was patient satisfaction with overall care. Secondary outcomes included patient experiences of individual aspects of dialysis care. RESULTS: 2145 (78.1%) adults responded to the questionnaire. Fewer than half (46.5% (95% CI 44.5% to 48.6%)) rated their overall care as excellent. Global perceptions of care were uninfluenced by most respondent characteristics except age and depressive symptoms; older respondents were less critical of their care (adjusted OR for excellent rating 1.44 (1.01 to 2.04)) and those with depressive symptoms were less satisfied (0.56 (0.44 to 0.71)). Aspects of care that respondents most frequently ranked as excellent were staff attention to dialysis vascular access (54% (52% to 56%)); caring of nurses (53% (51% to 55%)); staff responsiveness to pain or discomfort (51% (49% to 53%)); caring, helpfulness and sensitivity of dialysis staff (50% (48% to 52%)); and ease of reaching dialysis staff by telephone (48% (46% to 50%)). The aspects of care least frequently ranked as excellent were information provided when choosing a dialysis modality (23% (21% to 25%)), ease of seeing a social worker (28% (24% to 32%)), information provided about dialysis (34% (32% to 36%)), accuracy of information from nephrologist (eg, about prognosis or likelihood of a kidney transplant; 37% (35% to 39%)) and accuracy of nephrologists’ instructions (39% (36% to 41%)). CONCLUSIONS: Haemodialysis patients are least satisfied with the complex aspects of care. Patients’ expectations for accurate information, prognosis, the likelihood of kidney transplantation and their options when choosing dialysis treatment need to be considered when planning healthcare research and practices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4039823 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40398232014-06-02 Patient satisfaction with in-centre haemodialysis care: an international survey Palmer, Suetonia C de Berardis, Giorgia Craig, Jonathan C Tong, Allison Tonelli, Marcello Pellegrini, Fabio Ruospo, Marinella Hegbrant, Jörgen Wollheim, Charlotta Celia, Eduardo Gelfman, Ruben Ferrari, Juan Nin Törok, Marietta Murgo, Marco Leal, Miguel Bednarek-Skublewska, Anna Dulawa, Jan Strippoli, Giovanni F M BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine OBJECTIVES: To evaluate patient experiences of specific aspects of haemodialysis care across several countries. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey using the Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for End-Stage Renal Disease (CHOICE) questionnaire. SETTING: Haemodialysis clinics within a single provider in Europe and South America. PARTICIPANTS: 2748 adults treated in haemodialysis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was patient satisfaction with overall care. Secondary outcomes included patient experiences of individual aspects of dialysis care. RESULTS: 2145 (78.1%) adults responded to the questionnaire. Fewer than half (46.5% (95% CI 44.5% to 48.6%)) rated their overall care as excellent. Global perceptions of care were uninfluenced by most respondent characteristics except age and depressive symptoms; older respondents were less critical of their care (adjusted OR for excellent rating 1.44 (1.01 to 2.04)) and those with depressive symptoms were less satisfied (0.56 (0.44 to 0.71)). Aspects of care that respondents most frequently ranked as excellent were staff attention to dialysis vascular access (54% (52% to 56%)); caring of nurses (53% (51% to 55%)); staff responsiveness to pain or discomfort (51% (49% to 53%)); caring, helpfulness and sensitivity of dialysis staff (50% (48% to 52%)); and ease of reaching dialysis staff by telephone (48% (46% to 50%)). The aspects of care least frequently ranked as excellent were information provided when choosing a dialysis modality (23% (21% to 25%)), ease of seeing a social worker (28% (24% to 32%)), information provided about dialysis (34% (32% to 36%)), accuracy of information from nephrologist (eg, about prognosis or likelihood of a kidney transplant; 37% (35% to 39%)) and accuracy of nephrologists’ instructions (39% (36% to 41%)). CONCLUSIONS: Haemodialysis patients are least satisfied with the complex aspects of care. Patients’ expectations for accurate information, prognosis, the likelihood of kidney transplantation and their options when choosing dialysis treatment need to be considered when planning healthcare research and practices. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4039823/ /pubmed/24840250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005020 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Patient-Centred Medicine Palmer, Suetonia C de Berardis, Giorgia Craig, Jonathan C Tong, Allison Tonelli, Marcello Pellegrini, Fabio Ruospo, Marinella Hegbrant, Jörgen Wollheim, Charlotta Celia, Eduardo Gelfman, Ruben Ferrari, Juan Nin Törok, Marietta Murgo, Marco Leal, Miguel Bednarek-Skublewska, Anna Dulawa, Jan Strippoli, Giovanni F M Patient satisfaction with in-centre haemodialysis care: an international survey |
title | Patient satisfaction with in-centre haemodialysis care: an international survey |
title_full | Patient satisfaction with in-centre haemodialysis care: an international survey |
title_fullStr | Patient satisfaction with in-centre haemodialysis care: an international survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient satisfaction with in-centre haemodialysis care: an international survey |
title_short | Patient satisfaction with in-centre haemodialysis care: an international survey |
title_sort | patient satisfaction with in-centre haemodialysis care: an international survey |
topic | Patient-Centred Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4039823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24840250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT palmersuetoniac patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey AT deberardisgiorgia patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey AT craigjonathanc patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey AT tongallison patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey AT tonellimarcello patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey AT pellegrinifabio patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey AT ruospomarinella patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey AT hegbrantjorgen patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey AT wollheimcharlotta patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey AT celiaeduardo patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey AT gelfmanruben patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey AT ferrarijuannin patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey AT torokmarietta patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey AT murgomarco patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey AT lealmiguel patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey AT bednarekskublewskaanna patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey AT dulawajan patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey AT strippoligiovannifm patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey |