Cargando…

Patient satisfaction with in-centre haemodialysis care: an international survey

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate patient experiences of specific aspects of haemodialysis care across several countries. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey using the Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for End-Stage Renal Disease (CHOICE) questionnaire. SETTING: Haemodialysis clinics within a single provider...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palmer, Suetonia C, de Berardis, Giorgia, Craig, Jonathan C, Tong, Allison, Tonelli, Marcello, Pellegrini, Fabio, Ruospo, Marinella, Hegbrant, Jörgen, Wollheim, Charlotta, Celia, Eduardo, Gelfman, Ruben, Ferrari, Juan Nin, Törok, Marietta, Murgo, Marco, Leal, Miguel, Bednarek-Skublewska, Anna, Dulawa, Jan, Strippoli, Giovanni F M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4039823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24840250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005020
_version_ 1782318521982648320
author Palmer, Suetonia C
de Berardis, Giorgia
Craig, Jonathan C
Tong, Allison
Tonelli, Marcello
Pellegrini, Fabio
Ruospo, Marinella
Hegbrant, Jörgen
Wollheim, Charlotta
Celia, Eduardo
Gelfman, Ruben
Ferrari, Juan Nin
Törok, Marietta
Murgo, Marco
Leal, Miguel
Bednarek-Skublewska, Anna
Dulawa, Jan
Strippoli, Giovanni F M
author_facet Palmer, Suetonia C
de Berardis, Giorgia
Craig, Jonathan C
Tong, Allison
Tonelli, Marcello
Pellegrini, Fabio
Ruospo, Marinella
Hegbrant, Jörgen
Wollheim, Charlotta
Celia, Eduardo
Gelfman, Ruben
Ferrari, Juan Nin
Törok, Marietta
Murgo, Marco
Leal, Miguel
Bednarek-Skublewska, Anna
Dulawa, Jan
Strippoli, Giovanni F M
author_sort Palmer, Suetonia C
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate patient experiences of specific aspects of haemodialysis care across several countries. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey using the Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for End-Stage Renal Disease (CHOICE) questionnaire. SETTING: Haemodialysis clinics within a single provider in Europe and South America. PARTICIPANTS: 2748 adults treated in haemodialysis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was patient satisfaction with overall care. Secondary outcomes included patient experiences of individual aspects of dialysis care. RESULTS: 2145 (78.1%) adults responded to the questionnaire. Fewer than half (46.5% (95% CI 44.5% to 48.6%)) rated their overall care as excellent. Global perceptions of care were uninfluenced by most respondent characteristics except age and depressive symptoms; older respondents were less critical of their care (adjusted OR for excellent rating 1.44 (1.01 to 2.04)) and those with depressive symptoms were less satisfied (0.56 (0.44 to 0.71)). Aspects of care that respondents most frequently ranked as excellent were staff attention to dialysis vascular access (54% (52% to 56%)); caring of nurses (53% (51% to 55%)); staff responsiveness to pain or discomfort (51% (49% to 53%)); caring, helpfulness and sensitivity of dialysis staff (50% (48% to 52%)); and ease of reaching dialysis staff by telephone (48% (46% to 50%)). The aspects of care least frequently ranked as excellent were information provided when choosing a dialysis modality (23% (21% to 25%)), ease of seeing a social worker (28% (24% to 32%)), information provided about dialysis (34% (32% to 36%)), accuracy of information from nephrologist (eg, about prognosis or likelihood of a kidney transplant; 37% (35% to 39%)) and accuracy of nephrologists’ instructions (39% (36% to 41%)). CONCLUSIONS: Haemodialysis patients are least satisfied with the complex aspects of care. Patients’ expectations for accurate information, prognosis, the likelihood of kidney transplantation and their options when choosing dialysis treatment need to be considered when planning healthcare research and practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4039823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40398232014-06-02 Patient satisfaction with in-centre haemodialysis care: an international survey Palmer, Suetonia C de Berardis, Giorgia Craig, Jonathan C Tong, Allison Tonelli, Marcello Pellegrini, Fabio Ruospo, Marinella Hegbrant, Jörgen Wollheim, Charlotta Celia, Eduardo Gelfman, Ruben Ferrari, Juan Nin Törok, Marietta Murgo, Marco Leal, Miguel Bednarek-Skublewska, Anna Dulawa, Jan Strippoli, Giovanni F M BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine OBJECTIVES: To evaluate patient experiences of specific aspects of haemodialysis care across several countries. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey using the Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for End-Stage Renal Disease (CHOICE) questionnaire. SETTING: Haemodialysis clinics within a single provider in Europe and South America. PARTICIPANTS: 2748 adults treated in haemodialysis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was patient satisfaction with overall care. Secondary outcomes included patient experiences of individual aspects of dialysis care. RESULTS: 2145 (78.1%) adults responded to the questionnaire. Fewer than half (46.5% (95% CI 44.5% to 48.6%)) rated their overall care as excellent. Global perceptions of care were uninfluenced by most respondent characteristics except age and depressive symptoms; older respondents were less critical of their care (adjusted OR for excellent rating 1.44 (1.01 to 2.04)) and those with depressive symptoms were less satisfied (0.56 (0.44 to 0.71)). Aspects of care that respondents most frequently ranked as excellent were staff attention to dialysis vascular access (54% (52% to 56%)); caring of nurses (53% (51% to 55%)); staff responsiveness to pain or discomfort (51% (49% to 53%)); caring, helpfulness and sensitivity of dialysis staff (50% (48% to 52%)); and ease of reaching dialysis staff by telephone (48% (46% to 50%)). The aspects of care least frequently ranked as excellent were information provided when choosing a dialysis modality (23% (21% to 25%)), ease of seeing a social worker (28% (24% to 32%)), information provided about dialysis (34% (32% to 36%)), accuracy of information from nephrologist (eg, about prognosis or likelihood of a kidney transplant; 37% (35% to 39%)) and accuracy of nephrologists’ instructions (39% (36% to 41%)). CONCLUSIONS: Haemodialysis patients are least satisfied with the complex aspects of care. Patients’ expectations for accurate information, prognosis, the likelihood of kidney transplantation and their options when choosing dialysis treatment need to be considered when planning healthcare research and practices. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4039823/ /pubmed/24840250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005020 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Patient-Centred Medicine
Palmer, Suetonia C
de Berardis, Giorgia
Craig, Jonathan C
Tong, Allison
Tonelli, Marcello
Pellegrini, Fabio
Ruospo, Marinella
Hegbrant, Jörgen
Wollheim, Charlotta
Celia, Eduardo
Gelfman, Ruben
Ferrari, Juan Nin
Törok, Marietta
Murgo, Marco
Leal, Miguel
Bednarek-Skublewska, Anna
Dulawa, Jan
Strippoli, Giovanni F M
Patient satisfaction with in-centre haemodialysis care: an international survey
title Patient satisfaction with in-centre haemodialysis care: an international survey
title_full Patient satisfaction with in-centre haemodialysis care: an international survey
title_fullStr Patient satisfaction with in-centre haemodialysis care: an international survey
title_full_unstemmed Patient satisfaction with in-centre haemodialysis care: an international survey
title_short Patient satisfaction with in-centre haemodialysis care: an international survey
title_sort patient satisfaction with in-centre haemodialysis care: an international survey
topic Patient-Centred Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4039823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24840250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005020
work_keys_str_mv AT palmersuetoniac patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey
AT deberardisgiorgia patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey
AT craigjonathanc patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey
AT tongallison patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey
AT tonellimarcello patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey
AT pellegrinifabio patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey
AT ruospomarinella patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey
AT hegbrantjorgen patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey
AT wollheimcharlotta patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey
AT celiaeduardo patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey
AT gelfmanruben patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey
AT ferrarijuannin patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey
AT torokmarietta patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey
AT murgomarco patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey
AT lealmiguel patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey
AT bednarekskublewskaanna patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey
AT dulawajan patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey
AT strippoligiovannifm patientsatisfactionwithincentrehaemodialysiscareaninternationalsurvey