Cargando…

Prevention of head louse infestation: a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study of a novel concept product, 1% 1,2-octanediol spray versus placebo

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether regular use of a spray containing 1,2-octanediol 1%, which has been shown to inhibit survival of head lice, is able to work as a preventive against establishment of new infestations. SETTING: Randomised, double-blind, cross-over, community study in Cambridgeshire, UK...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burgess, Ian F, Brunton, Elizabeth R, French, Rebecca, Burgess, Nazma A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4039848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24879825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004634
_version_ 1782318525723967488
author Burgess, Ian F
Brunton, Elizabeth R
French, Rebecca
Burgess, Nazma A
author_facet Burgess, Ian F
Brunton, Elizabeth R
French, Rebecca
Burgess, Nazma A
author_sort Burgess, Ian F
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To determine whether regular use of a spray containing 1,2-octanediol 1%, which has been shown to inhibit survival of head lice, is able to work as a preventive against establishment of new infestations. SETTING: Randomised, double-blind, cross-over, community study in Cambridgeshire, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 63 male and female schoolchildren aged 4–16 years judged to have a high risk of recurrent infestation. Only the youngest member of a household attending school participated. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were treated to eliminate lice, randomised between 1% octanediol or placebo sprays for 6 weeks then crossed-over to the other spray for 6 weeks. Parents applied the sprays at least twice weekly or more frequently if the hair was washed. Investigators monitored weekly for infestation and replenished supplies of spray. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was the time taken until the first infestation event occurred. The secondary measure was safety of the product in regular use. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analysis found a total of 32 confirmed infestations in 20 participants, with 9 of them infested while using both products. In these nine participants the time to first infestation showed a significant advantage to 1% octanediol (p=0.0129). Per-protocol analysis showed only trends because the population included was not large enough to demonstrate significance. There were no serious adverse events and only two adverse events possibly related to treatment, one was a case of transient erythema and another of a rash that resolved after 5 days. CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of 1% octanediol spray provided a significant level of protection from infestation. It was concluded that this product is effective if applied regularly and thoroughly. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN09524995.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4039848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40398482014-06-02 Prevention of head louse infestation: a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study of a novel concept product, 1% 1,2-octanediol spray versus placebo Burgess, Ian F Brunton, Elizabeth R French, Rebecca Burgess, Nazma A BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: To determine whether regular use of a spray containing 1,2-octanediol 1%, which has been shown to inhibit survival of head lice, is able to work as a preventive against establishment of new infestations. SETTING: Randomised, double-blind, cross-over, community study in Cambridgeshire, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 63 male and female schoolchildren aged 4–16 years judged to have a high risk of recurrent infestation. Only the youngest member of a household attending school participated. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were treated to eliminate lice, randomised between 1% octanediol or placebo sprays for 6 weeks then crossed-over to the other spray for 6 weeks. Parents applied the sprays at least twice weekly or more frequently if the hair was washed. Investigators monitored weekly for infestation and replenished supplies of spray. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was the time taken until the first infestation event occurred. The secondary measure was safety of the product in regular use. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analysis found a total of 32 confirmed infestations in 20 participants, with 9 of them infested while using both products. In these nine participants the time to first infestation showed a significant advantage to 1% octanediol (p=0.0129). Per-protocol analysis showed only trends because the population included was not large enough to demonstrate significance. There were no serious adverse events and only two adverse events possibly related to treatment, one was a case of transient erythema and another of a rash that resolved after 5 days. CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of 1% octanediol spray provided a significant level of protection from infestation. It was concluded that this product is effective if applied regularly and thoroughly. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN09524995. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4039848/ /pubmed/24879825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004634 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Public Health
Burgess, Ian F
Brunton, Elizabeth R
French, Rebecca
Burgess, Nazma A
Prevention of head louse infestation: a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study of a novel concept product, 1% 1,2-octanediol spray versus placebo
title Prevention of head louse infestation: a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study of a novel concept product, 1% 1,2-octanediol spray versus placebo
title_full Prevention of head louse infestation: a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study of a novel concept product, 1% 1,2-octanediol spray versus placebo
title_fullStr Prevention of head louse infestation: a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study of a novel concept product, 1% 1,2-octanediol spray versus placebo
title_full_unstemmed Prevention of head louse infestation: a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study of a novel concept product, 1% 1,2-octanediol spray versus placebo
title_short Prevention of head louse infestation: a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study of a novel concept product, 1% 1,2-octanediol spray versus placebo
title_sort prevention of head louse infestation: a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study of a novel concept product, 1% 1,2-octanediol spray versus placebo
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4039848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24879825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004634
work_keys_str_mv AT burgessianf preventionofheadlouseinfestationarandomiseddoubleblindcrossoverstudyofanovelconceptproduct112octanediolsprayversusplacebo
AT bruntonelizabethr preventionofheadlouseinfestationarandomiseddoubleblindcrossoverstudyofanovelconceptproduct112octanediolsprayversusplacebo
AT frenchrebecca preventionofheadlouseinfestationarandomiseddoubleblindcrossoverstudyofanovelconceptproduct112octanediolsprayversusplacebo
AT burgessnazmaa preventionofheadlouseinfestationarandomiseddoubleblindcrossoverstudyofanovelconceptproduct112octanediolsprayversusplacebo