Cargando…
Prevention of head louse infestation: a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study of a novel concept product, 1% 1,2-octanediol spray versus placebo
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether regular use of a spray containing 1,2-octanediol 1%, which has been shown to inhibit survival of head lice, is able to work as a preventive against establishment of new infestations. SETTING: Randomised, double-blind, cross-over, community study in Cambridgeshire, UK...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4039848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24879825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004634 |
_version_ | 1782318525723967488 |
---|---|
author | Burgess, Ian F Brunton, Elizabeth R French, Rebecca Burgess, Nazma A |
author_facet | Burgess, Ian F Brunton, Elizabeth R French, Rebecca Burgess, Nazma A |
author_sort | Burgess, Ian F |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To determine whether regular use of a spray containing 1,2-octanediol 1%, which has been shown to inhibit survival of head lice, is able to work as a preventive against establishment of new infestations. SETTING: Randomised, double-blind, cross-over, community study in Cambridgeshire, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 63 male and female schoolchildren aged 4–16 years judged to have a high risk of recurrent infestation. Only the youngest member of a household attending school participated. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were treated to eliminate lice, randomised between 1% octanediol or placebo sprays for 6 weeks then crossed-over to the other spray for 6 weeks. Parents applied the sprays at least twice weekly or more frequently if the hair was washed. Investigators monitored weekly for infestation and replenished supplies of spray. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was the time taken until the first infestation event occurred. The secondary measure was safety of the product in regular use. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analysis found a total of 32 confirmed infestations in 20 participants, with 9 of them infested while using both products. In these nine participants the time to first infestation showed a significant advantage to 1% octanediol (p=0.0129). Per-protocol analysis showed only trends because the population included was not large enough to demonstrate significance. There were no serious adverse events and only two adverse events possibly related to treatment, one was a case of transient erythema and another of a rash that resolved after 5 days. CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of 1% octanediol spray provided a significant level of protection from infestation. It was concluded that this product is effective if applied regularly and thoroughly. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN09524995. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4039848 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40398482014-06-02 Prevention of head louse infestation: a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study of a novel concept product, 1% 1,2-octanediol spray versus placebo Burgess, Ian F Brunton, Elizabeth R French, Rebecca Burgess, Nazma A BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: To determine whether regular use of a spray containing 1,2-octanediol 1%, which has been shown to inhibit survival of head lice, is able to work as a preventive against establishment of new infestations. SETTING: Randomised, double-blind, cross-over, community study in Cambridgeshire, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 63 male and female schoolchildren aged 4–16 years judged to have a high risk of recurrent infestation. Only the youngest member of a household attending school participated. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were treated to eliminate lice, randomised between 1% octanediol or placebo sprays for 6 weeks then crossed-over to the other spray for 6 weeks. Parents applied the sprays at least twice weekly or more frequently if the hair was washed. Investigators monitored weekly for infestation and replenished supplies of spray. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was the time taken until the first infestation event occurred. The secondary measure was safety of the product in regular use. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analysis found a total of 32 confirmed infestations in 20 participants, with 9 of them infested while using both products. In these nine participants the time to first infestation showed a significant advantage to 1% octanediol (p=0.0129). Per-protocol analysis showed only trends because the population included was not large enough to demonstrate significance. There were no serious adverse events and only two adverse events possibly related to treatment, one was a case of transient erythema and another of a rash that resolved after 5 days. CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of 1% octanediol spray provided a significant level of protection from infestation. It was concluded that this product is effective if applied regularly and thoroughly. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN09524995. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4039848/ /pubmed/24879825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004634 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Public Health Burgess, Ian F Brunton, Elizabeth R French, Rebecca Burgess, Nazma A Prevention of head louse infestation: a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study of a novel concept product, 1% 1,2-octanediol spray versus placebo |
title | Prevention of head louse infestation: a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study of a novel concept product, 1% 1,2-octanediol spray versus placebo |
title_full | Prevention of head louse infestation: a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study of a novel concept product, 1% 1,2-octanediol spray versus placebo |
title_fullStr | Prevention of head louse infestation: a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study of a novel concept product, 1% 1,2-octanediol spray versus placebo |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevention of head louse infestation: a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study of a novel concept product, 1% 1,2-octanediol spray versus placebo |
title_short | Prevention of head louse infestation: a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study of a novel concept product, 1% 1,2-octanediol spray versus placebo |
title_sort | prevention of head louse infestation: a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study of a novel concept product, 1% 1,2-octanediol spray versus placebo |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4039848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24879825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004634 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burgessianf preventionofheadlouseinfestationarandomiseddoubleblindcrossoverstudyofanovelconceptproduct112octanediolsprayversusplacebo AT bruntonelizabethr preventionofheadlouseinfestationarandomiseddoubleblindcrossoverstudyofanovelconceptproduct112octanediolsprayversusplacebo AT frenchrebecca preventionofheadlouseinfestationarandomiseddoubleblindcrossoverstudyofanovelconceptproduct112octanediolsprayversusplacebo AT burgessnazmaa preventionofheadlouseinfestationarandomiseddoubleblindcrossoverstudyofanovelconceptproduct112octanediolsprayversusplacebo |