Cargando…

The development and exploratory analysis of the Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire (Back-PAQ)

OBJECTIVES: To develop an instrument to assess attitudes and underlying beliefs about back pain, and subsequently investigate its internal consistency and underlying structures. DESIGN: The instrument was developed by a multidisciplinary team of clinicians and researchers based on analysis of qualit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Darlow, Ben, Perry, Meredith, Mathieson, Fiona, Stanley, James, Melloh, Markus, Marsh, Reginald, Baxter, G David, Dowell, Anthony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4039861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24860003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005251
_version_ 1782318526414979072
author Darlow, Ben
Perry, Meredith
Mathieson, Fiona
Stanley, James
Melloh, Markus
Marsh, Reginald
Baxter, G David
Dowell, Anthony
author_facet Darlow, Ben
Perry, Meredith
Mathieson, Fiona
Stanley, James
Melloh, Markus
Marsh, Reginald
Baxter, G David
Dowell, Anthony
author_sort Darlow, Ben
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To develop an instrument to assess attitudes and underlying beliefs about back pain, and subsequently investigate its internal consistency and underlying structures. DESIGN: The instrument was developed by a multidisciplinary team of clinicians and researchers based on analysis of qualitative interviews with people experiencing acute and chronic back pain. Exploratory analysis was conducted using data from a population-based cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Qualitative interviews with community-based participants and subsequent postal survey. PARTICIPANTS: Instrument development informed by interviews with 12 participants with acute back pain and 11 participants with chronic back pain. Data for exploratory analysis collected from New Zealand residents and citizens aged 18 years and above. 1000 participants were randomly selected from the New Zealand Electoral Roll. 602 valid responses were received. MEASURES: The 34-item Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire (Back-PAQ) was developed. Internal consistency was evaluated by the Cronbach α coefficient. Exploratory analysis investigated the structure of the data using Principal Component Analysis. RESULTS: The 34-item long form of the scale had acceptable internal consistency (α=0.70; 95% CI 0.66 to 0.73). Exploratory analysis identified five two-item principal components which accounted for 74% of the variance in the reduced data set: ‘vulnerability of the back’; ‘relationship between back pain and injury’; ‘activity participation while experiencing back pain’; ‘prognosis of back pain’ and ‘psychological influences on recovery’. Internal consistency was acceptable for the reduced 10-item scale (α=0.61; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.66) and the identified components (α between 0.50 and 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: The 34-item long form of the scale may be appropriate for use in future cross-sectional studies. The 10-item short form may be appropriate for use as a screening tool, or an outcome assessment instrument. Further testing of the 10-item Back-PAQ's construct validity, reliability, responsiveness to change and predictive ability needs to be conducted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4039861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40398612014-06-02 The development and exploratory analysis of the Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire (Back-PAQ) Darlow, Ben Perry, Meredith Mathieson, Fiona Stanley, James Melloh, Markus Marsh, Reginald Baxter, G David Dowell, Anthony BMJ Open Research Methods OBJECTIVES: To develop an instrument to assess attitudes and underlying beliefs about back pain, and subsequently investigate its internal consistency and underlying structures. DESIGN: The instrument was developed by a multidisciplinary team of clinicians and researchers based on analysis of qualitative interviews with people experiencing acute and chronic back pain. Exploratory analysis was conducted using data from a population-based cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Qualitative interviews with community-based participants and subsequent postal survey. PARTICIPANTS: Instrument development informed by interviews with 12 participants with acute back pain and 11 participants with chronic back pain. Data for exploratory analysis collected from New Zealand residents and citizens aged 18 years and above. 1000 participants were randomly selected from the New Zealand Electoral Roll. 602 valid responses were received. MEASURES: The 34-item Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire (Back-PAQ) was developed. Internal consistency was evaluated by the Cronbach α coefficient. Exploratory analysis investigated the structure of the data using Principal Component Analysis. RESULTS: The 34-item long form of the scale had acceptable internal consistency (α=0.70; 95% CI 0.66 to 0.73). Exploratory analysis identified five two-item principal components which accounted for 74% of the variance in the reduced data set: ‘vulnerability of the back’; ‘relationship between back pain and injury’; ‘activity participation while experiencing back pain’; ‘prognosis of back pain’ and ‘psychological influences on recovery’. Internal consistency was acceptable for the reduced 10-item scale (α=0.61; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.66) and the identified components (α between 0.50 and 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: The 34-item long form of the scale may be appropriate for use in future cross-sectional studies. The 10-item short form may be appropriate for use as a screening tool, or an outcome assessment instrument. Further testing of the 10-item Back-PAQ's construct validity, reliability, responsiveness to change and predictive ability needs to be conducted. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4039861/ /pubmed/24860003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005251 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Research Methods
Darlow, Ben
Perry, Meredith
Mathieson, Fiona
Stanley, James
Melloh, Markus
Marsh, Reginald
Baxter, G David
Dowell, Anthony
The development and exploratory analysis of the Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire (Back-PAQ)
title The development and exploratory analysis of the Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire (Back-PAQ)
title_full The development and exploratory analysis of the Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire (Back-PAQ)
title_fullStr The development and exploratory analysis of the Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire (Back-PAQ)
title_full_unstemmed The development and exploratory analysis of the Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire (Back-PAQ)
title_short The development and exploratory analysis of the Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire (Back-PAQ)
title_sort development and exploratory analysis of the back pain attitudes questionnaire (back-paq)
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4039861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24860003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005251
work_keys_str_mv AT darlowben thedevelopmentandexploratoryanalysisofthebackpainattitudesquestionnairebackpaq
AT perrymeredith thedevelopmentandexploratoryanalysisofthebackpainattitudesquestionnairebackpaq
AT mathiesonfiona thedevelopmentandexploratoryanalysisofthebackpainattitudesquestionnairebackpaq
AT stanleyjames thedevelopmentandexploratoryanalysisofthebackpainattitudesquestionnairebackpaq
AT mellohmarkus thedevelopmentandexploratoryanalysisofthebackpainattitudesquestionnairebackpaq
AT marshreginald thedevelopmentandexploratoryanalysisofthebackpainattitudesquestionnairebackpaq
AT baxtergdavid thedevelopmentandexploratoryanalysisofthebackpainattitudesquestionnairebackpaq
AT dowellanthony thedevelopmentandexploratoryanalysisofthebackpainattitudesquestionnairebackpaq
AT darlowben developmentandexploratoryanalysisofthebackpainattitudesquestionnairebackpaq
AT perrymeredith developmentandexploratoryanalysisofthebackpainattitudesquestionnairebackpaq
AT mathiesonfiona developmentandexploratoryanalysisofthebackpainattitudesquestionnairebackpaq
AT stanleyjames developmentandexploratoryanalysisofthebackpainattitudesquestionnairebackpaq
AT mellohmarkus developmentandexploratoryanalysisofthebackpainattitudesquestionnairebackpaq
AT marshreginald developmentandexploratoryanalysisofthebackpainattitudesquestionnairebackpaq
AT baxtergdavid developmentandexploratoryanalysisofthebackpainattitudesquestionnairebackpaq
AT dowellanthony developmentandexploratoryanalysisofthebackpainattitudesquestionnairebackpaq