Cargando…
IMPOSE (IMProving Outcomes after Sepsis)—the effect of a multidisciplinary follow-up service on health-related quality of life in patients postsepsis syndromes—a double-blinded randomised controlled trial: protocol
INTRODUCTION: Patients post sepsis syndromes have a poor quality of life and a high rate of recurring illness or mortality. Follow-up clinics have been instituted for patients postgeneral intensive care but evidence is sparse, and there has been no clinic specifically for survivors of sepsis. The ai...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4039866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24861549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004966 |
_version_ | 1782318527544295424 |
---|---|
author | Paratz, Jennifer D Kenardy, Justin Mitchell, Geoffrey Comans, Tracy Coyer, Fiona Thomas, Peter Singh, Sunil Luparia, Louise Boots, Robert J |
author_facet | Paratz, Jennifer D Kenardy, Justin Mitchell, Geoffrey Comans, Tracy Coyer, Fiona Thomas, Peter Singh, Sunil Luparia, Louise Boots, Robert J |
author_sort | Paratz, Jennifer D |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Patients post sepsis syndromes have a poor quality of life and a high rate of recurring illness or mortality. Follow-up clinics have been instituted for patients postgeneral intensive care but evidence is sparse, and there has been no clinic specifically for survivors of sepsis. The aim of this trial is to investigate if targeted screening and appropriate intervention to these patients can result in an improved quality of life (Short Form 36 health survey (SF36V.2)), decreased mortality in the first 12 months, decreased readmission to hospital and/or decreased use of health resources. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 204 patients postsepsis syndromes will be randomised to one of the two groups. The intervention group will attend an outpatient clinic two monthly for 6 months and receive screening and targeted intervention. The usual care group will remain under the care of their physician. To analyse the results, a baseline comparison will be carried out between each group. Generalised estimating equations will compare the SF36 domain scores between groups and across time points. Mortality will be compared between groups using a Cox proportional hazards (time until death) analysis. Time to first readmission will be compared between groups by a survival analysis. Healthcare costs will be compared between groups using a generalised linear model. Economic (health resource) evaluation will be a within-trial incremental cost utility analysis with a societal perspective. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted by the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC; HREC/13/QRBW/17), The University of Queensland HREC (2013000543), Griffith University (RHS/08/14/HREC) and the Australian Government Department of Health (26/2013). The results of this study will be submitted to peer-reviewed intensive care journals and presented at national and international intensive care and/or rehabilitation conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613000528752. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4039866 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40398662014-06-02 IMPOSE (IMProving Outcomes after Sepsis)—the effect of a multidisciplinary follow-up service on health-related quality of life in patients postsepsis syndromes—a double-blinded randomised controlled trial: protocol Paratz, Jennifer D Kenardy, Justin Mitchell, Geoffrey Comans, Tracy Coyer, Fiona Thomas, Peter Singh, Sunil Luparia, Louise Boots, Robert J BMJ Open Intensive Care INTRODUCTION: Patients post sepsis syndromes have a poor quality of life and a high rate of recurring illness or mortality. Follow-up clinics have been instituted for patients postgeneral intensive care but evidence is sparse, and there has been no clinic specifically for survivors of sepsis. The aim of this trial is to investigate if targeted screening and appropriate intervention to these patients can result in an improved quality of life (Short Form 36 health survey (SF36V.2)), decreased mortality in the first 12 months, decreased readmission to hospital and/or decreased use of health resources. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 204 patients postsepsis syndromes will be randomised to one of the two groups. The intervention group will attend an outpatient clinic two monthly for 6 months and receive screening and targeted intervention. The usual care group will remain under the care of their physician. To analyse the results, a baseline comparison will be carried out between each group. Generalised estimating equations will compare the SF36 domain scores between groups and across time points. Mortality will be compared between groups using a Cox proportional hazards (time until death) analysis. Time to first readmission will be compared between groups by a survival analysis. Healthcare costs will be compared between groups using a generalised linear model. Economic (health resource) evaluation will be a within-trial incremental cost utility analysis with a societal perspective. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted by the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC; HREC/13/QRBW/17), The University of Queensland HREC (2013000543), Griffith University (RHS/08/14/HREC) and the Australian Government Department of Health (26/2013). The results of this study will be submitted to peer-reviewed intensive care journals and presented at national and international intensive care and/or rehabilitation conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613000528752. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4039866/ /pubmed/24861549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004966 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Intensive Care Paratz, Jennifer D Kenardy, Justin Mitchell, Geoffrey Comans, Tracy Coyer, Fiona Thomas, Peter Singh, Sunil Luparia, Louise Boots, Robert J IMPOSE (IMProving Outcomes after Sepsis)—the effect of a multidisciplinary follow-up service on health-related quality of life in patients postsepsis syndromes—a double-blinded randomised controlled trial: protocol |
title | IMPOSE (IMProving Outcomes after Sepsis)—the effect of a multidisciplinary follow-up service on health-related quality of life in patients postsepsis syndromes—a double-blinded randomised controlled trial: protocol |
title_full | IMPOSE (IMProving Outcomes after Sepsis)—the effect of a multidisciplinary follow-up service on health-related quality of life in patients postsepsis syndromes—a double-blinded randomised controlled trial: protocol |
title_fullStr | IMPOSE (IMProving Outcomes after Sepsis)—the effect of a multidisciplinary follow-up service on health-related quality of life in patients postsepsis syndromes—a double-blinded randomised controlled trial: protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | IMPOSE (IMProving Outcomes after Sepsis)—the effect of a multidisciplinary follow-up service on health-related quality of life in patients postsepsis syndromes—a double-blinded randomised controlled trial: protocol |
title_short | IMPOSE (IMProving Outcomes after Sepsis)—the effect of a multidisciplinary follow-up service on health-related quality of life in patients postsepsis syndromes—a double-blinded randomised controlled trial: protocol |
title_sort | impose (improving outcomes after sepsis)—the effect of a multidisciplinary follow-up service on health-related quality of life in patients postsepsis syndromes—a double-blinded randomised controlled trial: protocol |
topic | Intensive Care |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4039866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24861549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004966 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paratzjenniferd imposeimprovingoutcomesaftersepsistheeffectofamultidisciplinaryfollowupserviceonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientspostsepsissyndromesadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT kenardyjustin imposeimprovingoutcomesaftersepsistheeffectofamultidisciplinaryfollowupserviceonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientspostsepsissyndromesadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT mitchellgeoffrey imposeimprovingoutcomesaftersepsistheeffectofamultidisciplinaryfollowupserviceonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientspostsepsissyndromesadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT comanstracy imposeimprovingoutcomesaftersepsistheeffectofamultidisciplinaryfollowupserviceonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientspostsepsissyndromesadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT coyerfiona imposeimprovingoutcomesaftersepsistheeffectofamultidisciplinaryfollowupserviceonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientspostsepsissyndromesadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT thomaspeter imposeimprovingoutcomesaftersepsistheeffectofamultidisciplinaryfollowupserviceonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientspostsepsissyndromesadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT singhsunil imposeimprovingoutcomesaftersepsistheeffectofamultidisciplinaryfollowupserviceonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientspostsepsissyndromesadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT luparialouise imposeimprovingoutcomesaftersepsistheeffectofamultidisciplinaryfollowupserviceonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientspostsepsissyndromesadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol AT bootsrobertj imposeimprovingoutcomesaftersepsistheeffectofamultidisciplinaryfollowupserviceonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientspostsepsissyndromesadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol |