Cargando…

IMPOSE (IMProving Outcomes after Sepsis)—the effect of a multidisciplinary follow-up service on health-related quality of life in patients postsepsis syndromes—a double-blinded randomised controlled trial: protocol

INTRODUCTION: Patients post sepsis syndromes have a poor quality of life and a high rate of recurring illness or mortality. Follow-up clinics have been instituted for patients postgeneral intensive care but evidence is sparse, and there has been no clinic specifically for survivors of sepsis. The ai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paratz, Jennifer D, Kenardy, Justin, Mitchell, Geoffrey, Comans, Tracy, Coyer, Fiona, Thomas, Peter, Singh, Sunil, Luparia, Louise, Boots, Robert J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4039866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24861549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004966
_version_ 1782318527544295424
author Paratz, Jennifer D
Kenardy, Justin
Mitchell, Geoffrey
Comans, Tracy
Coyer, Fiona
Thomas, Peter
Singh, Sunil
Luparia, Louise
Boots, Robert J
author_facet Paratz, Jennifer D
Kenardy, Justin
Mitchell, Geoffrey
Comans, Tracy
Coyer, Fiona
Thomas, Peter
Singh, Sunil
Luparia, Louise
Boots, Robert J
author_sort Paratz, Jennifer D
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Patients post sepsis syndromes have a poor quality of life and a high rate of recurring illness or mortality. Follow-up clinics have been instituted for patients postgeneral intensive care but evidence is sparse, and there has been no clinic specifically for survivors of sepsis. The aim of this trial is to investigate if targeted screening and appropriate intervention to these patients can result in an improved quality of life (Short Form 36 health survey (SF36V.2)), decreased mortality in the first 12 months, decreased readmission to hospital and/or decreased use of health resources. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 204 patients postsepsis syndromes will be randomised to one of the two groups. The intervention group will attend an outpatient clinic two monthly for 6 months and receive screening and targeted intervention. The usual care group will remain under the care of their physician. To analyse the results, a baseline comparison will be carried out between each group. Generalised estimating equations will compare the SF36 domain scores between groups and across time points. Mortality will be compared between groups using a Cox proportional hazards (time until death) analysis. Time to first readmission will be compared between groups by a survival analysis. Healthcare costs will be compared between groups using a generalised linear model. Economic (health resource) evaluation will be a within-trial incremental cost utility analysis with a societal perspective. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted by the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC; HREC/13/QRBW/17), The University of Queensland HREC (2013000543), Griffith University (RHS/08/14/HREC) and the Australian Government Department of Health (26/2013). The results of this study will be submitted to peer-reviewed intensive care journals and presented at national and international intensive care and/or rehabilitation conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613000528752.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4039866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40398662014-06-02 IMPOSE (IMProving Outcomes after Sepsis)—the effect of a multidisciplinary follow-up service on health-related quality of life in patients postsepsis syndromes—a double-blinded randomised controlled trial: protocol Paratz, Jennifer D Kenardy, Justin Mitchell, Geoffrey Comans, Tracy Coyer, Fiona Thomas, Peter Singh, Sunil Luparia, Louise Boots, Robert J BMJ Open Intensive Care INTRODUCTION: Patients post sepsis syndromes have a poor quality of life and a high rate of recurring illness or mortality. Follow-up clinics have been instituted for patients postgeneral intensive care but evidence is sparse, and there has been no clinic specifically for survivors of sepsis. The aim of this trial is to investigate if targeted screening and appropriate intervention to these patients can result in an improved quality of life (Short Form 36 health survey (SF36V.2)), decreased mortality in the first 12 months, decreased readmission to hospital and/or decreased use of health resources. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 204 patients postsepsis syndromes will be randomised to one of the two groups. The intervention group will attend an outpatient clinic two monthly for 6 months and receive screening and targeted intervention. The usual care group will remain under the care of their physician. To analyse the results, a baseline comparison will be carried out between each group. Generalised estimating equations will compare the SF36 domain scores between groups and across time points. Mortality will be compared between groups using a Cox proportional hazards (time until death) analysis. Time to first readmission will be compared between groups by a survival analysis. Healthcare costs will be compared between groups using a generalised linear model. Economic (health resource) evaluation will be a within-trial incremental cost utility analysis with a societal perspective. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted by the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC; HREC/13/QRBW/17), The University of Queensland HREC (2013000543), Griffith University (RHS/08/14/HREC) and the Australian Government Department of Health (26/2013). The results of this study will be submitted to peer-reviewed intensive care journals and presented at national and international intensive care and/or rehabilitation conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613000528752. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4039866/ /pubmed/24861549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004966 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Intensive Care
Paratz, Jennifer D
Kenardy, Justin
Mitchell, Geoffrey
Comans, Tracy
Coyer, Fiona
Thomas, Peter
Singh, Sunil
Luparia, Louise
Boots, Robert J
IMPOSE (IMProving Outcomes after Sepsis)—the effect of a multidisciplinary follow-up service on health-related quality of life in patients postsepsis syndromes—a double-blinded randomised controlled trial: protocol
title IMPOSE (IMProving Outcomes after Sepsis)—the effect of a multidisciplinary follow-up service on health-related quality of life in patients postsepsis syndromes—a double-blinded randomised controlled trial: protocol
title_full IMPOSE (IMProving Outcomes after Sepsis)—the effect of a multidisciplinary follow-up service on health-related quality of life in patients postsepsis syndromes—a double-blinded randomised controlled trial: protocol
title_fullStr IMPOSE (IMProving Outcomes after Sepsis)—the effect of a multidisciplinary follow-up service on health-related quality of life in patients postsepsis syndromes—a double-blinded randomised controlled trial: protocol
title_full_unstemmed IMPOSE (IMProving Outcomes after Sepsis)—the effect of a multidisciplinary follow-up service on health-related quality of life in patients postsepsis syndromes—a double-blinded randomised controlled trial: protocol
title_short IMPOSE (IMProving Outcomes after Sepsis)—the effect of a multidisciplinary follow-up service on health-related quality of life in patients postsepsis syndromes—a double-blinded randomised controlled trial: protocol
title_sort impose (improving outcomes after sepsis)—the effect of a multidisciplinary follow-up service on health-related quality of life in patients postsepsis syndromes—a double-blinded randomised controlled trial: protocol
topic Intensive Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4039866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24861549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004966
work_keys_str_mv AT paratzjenniferd imposeimprovingoutcomesaftersepsistheeffectofamultidisciplinaryfollowupserviceonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientspostsepsissyndromesadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT kenardyjustin imposeimprovingoutcomesaftersepsistheeffectofamultidisciplinaryfollowupserviceonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientspostsepsissyndromesadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT mitchellgeoffrey imposeimprovingoutcomesaftersepsistheeffectofamultidisciplinaryfollowupserviceonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientspostsepsissyndromesadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT comanstracy imposeimprovingoutcomesaftersepsistheeffectofamultidisciplinaryfollowupserviceonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientspostsepsissyndromesadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT coyerfiona imposeimprovingoutcomesaftersepsistheeffectofamultidisciplinaryfollowupserviceonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientspostsepsissyndromesadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT thomaspeter imposeimprovingoutcomesaftersepsistheeffectofamultidisciplinaryfollowupserviceonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientspostsepsissyndromesadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT singhsunil imposeimprovingoutcomesaftersepsistheeffectofamultidisciplinaryfollowupserviceonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientspostsepsissyndromesadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT luparialouise imposeimprovingoutcomesaftersepsistheeffectofamultidisciplinaryfollowupserviceonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientspostsepsissyndromesadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol
AT bootsrobertj imposeimprovingoutcomesaftersepsistheeffectofamultidisciplinaryfollowupserviceonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientspostsepsissyndromesadoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocol