Cargando…
A Comparison of the Fixation Strengths Provided by Different Intraosseous Tendon Lengths during Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Tibial Model
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the tibial fixation strength provided by different intraosseous soft tissue graft lengths within the tibial tunnel. METHODS: Porcine tibial bones and digital flexor tendons were used for testing. Bone mineral densities of proximal tibial medial...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Orthopaedic Association
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4040377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24900898 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2014.6.2.173 |
_version_ | 1782318564759306240 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Dong-Lyul Cheon, Sang-Ho Oh, Chang-Wug Kyung, Hee-Soo |
author_facet | Yang, Dong-Lyul Cheon, Sang-Ho Oh, Chang-Wug Kyung, Hee-Soo |
author_sort | Yang, Dong-Lyul |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the tibial fixation strength provided by different intraosseous soft tissue graft lengths within the tibial tunnel. METHODS: Porcine tibial bones and digital flexor tendons were used for testing. Bone mineral densities of proximal tibial medial condyles were measured, and two-strand tendon bundles of 8 mm diameter were used. An intraosseous graft length of 2 cm was used in group 1 (n = 10), and a graft length of 4 cm was used in group 2 (n = 10). Tunnels were 4 cm in length and 8 mm in diameter. Tibial fixation was performed using a suture tied around a screw post with a washer and an additionally inserted 7 × 20 mm bioabsorbable screw. After applying preconditioning loading of 10 cycles, 1,000 cycles between 70-220 N were applied at a frequency of 1 Hz. Graft slippage and total graft movement were recorded. Ultimate tensile strength was measured by pull-out testing at an Instron crosshead speed of 1,000 mm/min. RESULTS: No significant intergroup difference was found for total graft movement after cyclic loading (slippage in group 1, 1.2 mm and group 2, 1.2 mm, respectively, p = 0.917; and total graft movement in group 1, 3.3 mm and group 2, 2.7 mm, respectively, p = 0.199). However, mean ultimate tensile strength in group 2 was significantly higher than that in group 1 (group 1, 649.9 N; group 2, 938 N; p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: In a porcine model, ultimate tensile strength was greater for a 4 cm long intraosseous flexor tendon in the tibial tunnel. However, no intergroup difference in graft slippage or total graft movement was observed. The results show that a 2 cm intraosseous graft length in the tibial tunnel is safe and has sufficient strength (> 450 N) for adequate rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4040377 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | The Korean Orthopaedic Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40403772014-06-04 A Comparison of the Fixation Strengths Provided by Different Intraosseous Tendon Lengths during Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Tibial Model Yang, Dong-Lyul Cheon, Sang-Ho Oh, Chang-Wug Kyung, Hee-Soo Clin Orthop Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the tibial fixation strength provided by different intraosseous soft tissue graft lengths within the tibial tunnel. METHODS: Porcine tibial bones and digital flexor tendons were used for testing. Bone mineral densities of proximal tibial medial condyles were measured, and two-strand tendon bundles of 8 mm diameter were used. An intraosseous graft length of 2 cm was used in group 1 (n = 10), and a graft length of 4 cm was used in group 2 (n = 10). Tunnels were 4 cm in length and 8 mm in diameter. Tibial fixation was performed using a suture tied around a screw post with a washer and an additionally inserted 7 × 20 mm bioabsorbable screw. After applying preconditioning loading of 10 cycles, 1,000 cycles between 70-220 N were applied at a frequency of 1 Hz. Graft slippage and total graft movement were recorded. Ultimate tensile strength was measured by pull-out testing at an Instron crosshead speed of 1,000 mm/min. RESULTS: No significant intergroup difference was found for total graft movement after cyclic loading (slippage in group 1, 1.2 mm and group 2, 1.2 mm, respectively, p = 0.917; and total graft movement in group 1, 3.3 mm and group 2, 2.7 mm, respectively, p = 0.199). However, mean ultimate tensile strength in group 2 was significantly higher than that in group 1 (group 1, 649.9 N; group 2, 938 N; p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: In a porcine model, ultimate tensile strength was greater for a 4 cm long intraosseous flexor tendon in the tibial tunnel. However, no intergroup difference in graft slippage or total graft movement was observed. The results show that a 2 cm intraosseous graft length in the tibial tunnel is safe and has sufficient strength (> 450 N) for adequate rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2014-06 2014-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4040377/ /pubmed/24900898 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2014.6.2.173 Text en Copyright © 2014 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yang, Dong-Lyul Cheon, Sang-Ho Oh, Chang-Wug Kyung, Hee-Soo A Comparison of the Fixation Strengths Provided by Different Intraosseous Tendon Lengths during Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Tibial Model |
title | A Comparison of the Fixation Strengths Provided by Different Intraosseous Tendon Lengths during Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Tibial Model |
title_full | A Comparison of the Fixation Strengths Provided by Different Intraosseous Tendon Lengths during Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Tibial Model |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of the Fixation Strengths Provided by Different Intraosseous Tendon Lengths during Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Tibial Model |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of the Fixation Strengths Provided by Different Intraosseous Tendon Lengths during Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Tibial Model |
title_short | A Comparison of the Fixation Strengths Provided by Different Intraosseous Tendon Lengths during Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Tibial Model |
title_sort | comparison of the fixation strengths provided by different intraosseous tendon lengths during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study in a porcine tibial model |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4040377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24900898 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2014.6.2.173 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangdonglyul acomparisonofthefixationstrengthsprovidedbydifferentintraosseoustendonlengthsduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabiomechanicalstudyinaporcinetibialmodel AT cheonsangho acomparisonofthefixationstrengthsprovidedbydifferentintraosseoustendonlengthsduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabiomechanicalstudyinaporcinetibialmodel AT ohchangwug acomparisonofthefixationstrengthsprovidedbydifferentintraosseoustendonlengthsduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabiomechanicalstudyinaporcinetibialmodel AT kyungheesoo acomparisonofthefixationstrengthsprovidedbydifferentintraosseoustendonlengthsduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabiomechanicalstudyinaporcinetibialmodel AT yangdonglyul comparisonofthefixationstrengthsprovidedbydifferentintraosseoustendonlengthsduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabiomechanicalstudyinaporcinetibialmodel AT cheonsangho comparisonofthefixationstrengthsprovidedbydifferentintraosseoustendonlengthsduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabiomechanicalstudyinaporcinetibialmodel AT ohchangwug comparisonofthefixationstrengthsprovidedbydifferentintraosseoustendonlengthsduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabiomechanicalstudyinaporcinetibialmodel AT kyungheesoo comparisonofthefixationstrengthsprovidedbydifferentintraosseoustendonlengthsduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabiomechanicalstudyinaporcinetibialmodel |