Cargando…

A Comparison of the Fixation Strengths Provided by Different Intraosseous Tendon Lengths during Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Tibial Model

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the tibial fixation strength provided by different intraosseous soft tissue graft lengths within the tibial tunnel. METHODS: Porcine tibial bones and digital flexor tendons were used for testing. Bone mineral densities of proximal tibial medial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Dong-Lyul, Cheon, Sang-Ho, Oh, Chang-Wug, Kyung, Hee-Soo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4040377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24900898
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2014.6.2.173
_version_ 1782318564759306240
author Yang, Dong-Lyul
Cheon, Sang-Ho
Oh, Chang-Wug
Kyung, Hee-Soo
author_facet Yang, Dong-Lyul
Cheon, Sang-Ho
Oh, Chang-Wug
Kyung, Hee-Soo
author_sort Yang, Dong-Lyul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the tibial fixation strength provided by different intraosseous soft tissue graft lengths within the tibial tunnel. METHODS: Porcine tibial bones and digital flexor tendons were used for testing. Bone mineral densities of proximal tibial medial condyles were measured, and two-strand tendon bundles of 8 mm diameter were used. An intraosseous graft length of 2 cm was used in group 1 (n = 10), and a graft length of 4 cm was used in group 2 (n = 10). Tunnels were 4 cm in length and 8 mm in diameter. Tibial fixation was performed using a suture tied around a screw post with a washer and an additionally inserted 7 × 20 mm bioabsorbable screw. After applying preconditioning loading of 10 cycles, 1,000 cycles between 70-220 N were applied at a frequency of 1 Hz. Graft slippage and total graft movement were recorded. Ultimate tensile strength was measured by pull-out testing at an Instron crosshead speed of 1,000 mm/min. RESULTS: No significant intergroup difference was found for total graft movement after cyclic loading (slippage in group 1, 1.2 mm and group 2, 1.2 mm, respectively, p = 0.917; and total graft movement in group 1, 3.3 mm and group 2, 2.7 mm, respectively, p = 0.199). However, mean ultimate tensile strength in group 2 was significantly higher than that in group 1 (group 1, 649.9 N; group 2, 938 N; p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: In a porcine model, ultimate tensile strength was greater for a 4 cm long intraosseous flexor tendon in the tibial tunnel. However, no intergroup difference in graft slippage or total graft movement was observed. The results show that a 2 cm intraosseous graft length in the tibial tunnel is safe and has sufficient strength (> 450 N) for adequate rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4040377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Orthopaedic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40403772014-06-04 A Comparison of the Fixation Strengths Provided by Different Intraosseous Tendon Lengths during Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Tibial Model Yang, Dong-Lyul Cheon, Sang-Ho Oh, Chang-Wug Kyung, Hee-Soo Clin Orthop Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the tibial fixation strength provided by different intraosseous soft tissue graft lengths within the tibial tunnel. METHODS: Porcine tibial bones and digital flexor tendons were used for testing. Bone mineral densities of proximal tibial medial condyles were measured, and two-strand tendon bundles of 8 mm diameter were used. An intraosseous graft length of 2 cm was used in group 1 (n = 10), and a graft length of 4 cm was used in group 2 (n = 10). Tunnels were 4 cm in length and 8 mm in diameter. Tibial fixation was performed using a suture tied around a screw post with a washer and an additionally inserted 7 × 20 mm bioabsorbable screw. After applying preconditioning loading of 10 cycles, 1,000 cycles between 70-220 N were applied at a frequency of 1 Hz. Graft slippage and total graft movement were recorded. Ultimate tensile strength was measured by pull-out testing at an Instron crosshead speed of 1,000 mm/min. RESULTS: No significant intergroup difference was found for total graft movement after cyclic loading (slippage in group 1, 1.2 mm and group 2, 1.2 mm, respectively, p = 0.917; and total graft movement in group 1, 3.3 mm and group 2, 2.7 mm, respectively, p = 0.199). However, mean ultimate tensile strength in group 2 was significantly higher than that in group 1 (group 1, 649.9 N; group 2, 938 N; p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: In a porcine model, ultimate tensile strength was greater for a 4 cm long intraosseous flexor tendon in the tibial tunnel. However, no intergroup difference in graft slippage or total graft movement was observed. The results show that a 2 cm intraosseous graft length in the tibial tunnel is safe and has sufficient strength (> 450 N) for adequate rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2014-06 2014-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4040377/ /pubmed/24900898 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2014.6.2.173 Text en Copyright © 2014 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yang, Dong-Lyul
Cheon, Sang-Ho
Oh, Chang-Wug
Kyung, Hee-Soo
A Comparison of the Fixation Strengths Provided by Different Intraosseous Tendon Lengths during Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Tibial Model
title A Comparison of the Fixation Strengths Provided by Different Intraosseous Tendon Lengths during Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Tibial Model
title_full A Comparison of the Fixation Strengths Provided by Different Intraosseous Tendon Lengths during Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Tibial Model
title_fullStr A Comparison of the Fixation Strengths Provided by Different Intraosseous Tendon Lengths during Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Tibial Model
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of the Fixation Strengths Provided by Different Intraosseous Tendon Lengths during Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Tibial Model
title_short A Comparison of the Fixation Strengths Provided by Different Intraosseous Tendon Lengths during Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Tibial Model
title_sort comparison of the fixation strengths provided by different intraosseous tendon lengths during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study in a porcine tibial model
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4040377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24900898
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2014.6.2.173
work_keys_str_mv AT yangdonglyul acomparisonofthefixationstrengthsprovidedbydifferentintraosseoustendonlengthsduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabiomechanicalstudyinaporcinetibialmodel
AT cheonsangho acomparisonofthefixationstrengthsprovidedbydifferentintraosseoustendonlengthsduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabiomechanicalstudyinaporcinetibialmodel
AT ohchangwug acomparisonofthefixationstrengthsprovidedbydifferentintraosseoustendonlengthsduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabiomechanicalstudyinaporcinetibialmodel
AT kyungheesoo acomparisonofthefixationstrengthsprovidedbydifferentintraosseoustendonlengthsduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabiomechanicalstudyinaporcinetibialmodel
AT yangdonglyul comparisonofthefixationstrengthsprovidedbydifferentintraosseoustendonlengthsduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabiomechanicalstudyinaporcinetibialmodel
AT cheonsangho comparisonofthefixationstrengthsprovidedbydifferentintraosseoustendonlengthsduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabiomechanicalstudyinaporcinetibialmodel
AT ohchangwug comparisonofthefixationstrengthsprovidedbydifferentintraosseoustendonlengthsduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabiomechanicalstudyinaporcinetibialmodel
AT kyungheesoo comparisonofthefixationstrengthsprovidedbydifferentintraosseoustendonlengthsduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionabiomechanicalstudyinaporcinetibialmodel