Cargando…
Evaluating the optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections are the most common hospital-acquired infections among surgical patients. The administration of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis reduces the risk of surgical site infections . The optimal timing of this procedure is still a matter of debate. While most studies...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4040488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-188 |
_version_ | 1782318579387990016 |
---|---|
author | Mujagic, Edin Zwimpfer, Tibor Marti, Walter R Zwahlen, Marcel Hoffmann, Henry Kindler, Christoph Fux, Christoph Misteli, Heidi Iselin, Lukas Lugli, Andrea Kopp Nebiker, Christian A von Holzen, Urs Vinzens, Fabrizio von Strauss, Marco Reck, Stefan Kraljević, Marko Widmer, Andreas F Oertli, Daniel Rosenthal, Rachel Weber, Walter P |
author_facet | Mujagic, Edin Zwimpfer, Tibor Marti, Walter R Zwahlen, Marcel Hoffmann, Henry Kindler, Christoph Fux, Christoph Misteli, Heidi Iselin, Lukas Lugli, Andrea Kopp Nebiker, Christian A von Holzen, Urs Vinzens, Fabrizio von Strauss, Marco Reck, Stefan Kraljević, Marko Widmer, Andreas F Oertli, Daniel Rosenthal, Rachel Weber, Walter P |
author_sort | Mujagic, Edin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections are the most common hospital-acquired infections among surgical patients. The administration of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis reduces the risk of surgical site infections . The optimal timing of this procedure is still a matter of debate. While most studies suggest that it should be given as close to the incision time as possible, others conclude that this may be too late for optimal prevention of surgical site infections. A large observational study suggests that surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis should be administered 74 to 30 minutes before surgery. The aim of this article is to report the design and protocol of a randomized controlled trial investigating the optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis. METHODS/DESIGN: In this bi-center randomized controlled trial conducted at two tertiary referral centers in Switzerland, we plan to include 5,000 patients undergoing general, oncologic, vascular and orthopedic trauma procedures. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: one receiving surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the anesthesia room (75 to 30 minutes before incision) and the other receiving surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the operating room (less than 30 minutes before incision). We expect a significantly lower rate of surgical site infections with surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis administered more than 30 minutes before the scheduled incision. The primary outcome is the occurrence of surgical site infections during a 30-day follow-up period (one year with an implant in place). When assuming a 5% surgical site infection risk with administration of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the operating room, the planned sample size has an 80% power to detect a relative risk reduction for surgical site infections of 33% when administering surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the anesthesia room (with a two-sided type I error of 5%). We expect the study to be completed within three years. DISCUSSION: The results of this randomized controlled trial will have an important impact on current international guidelines for infection control strategies in the hospital. Moreover, the results of this randomized controlled trial are of significant interest for patient safety and healthcare economics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT01790529. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4040488 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40404882014-06-03 Evaluating the optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Mujagic, Edin Zwimpfer, Tibor Marti, Walter R Zwahlen, Marcel Hoffmann, Henry Kindler, Christoph Fux, Christoph Misteli, Heidi Iselin, Lukas Lugli, Andrea Kopp Nebiker, Christian A von Holzen, Urs Vinzens, Fabrizio von Strauss, Marco Reck, Stefan Kraljević, Marko Widmer, Andreas F Oertli, Daniel Rosenthal, Rachel Weber, Walter P Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections are the most common hospital-acquired infections among surgical patients. The administration of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis reduces the risk of surgical site infections . The optimal timing of this procedure is still a matter of debate. While most studies suggest that it should be given as close to the incision time as possible, others conclude that this may be too late for optimal prevention of surgical site infections. A large observational study suggests that surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis should be administered 74 to 30 minutes before surgery. The aim of this article is to report the design and protocol of a randomized controlled trial investigating the optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis. METHODS/DESIGN: In this bi-center randomized controlled trial conducted at two tertiary referral centers in Switzerland, we plan to include 5,000 patients undergoing general, oncologic, vascular and orthopedic trauma procedures. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: one receiving surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the anesthesia room (75 to 30 minutes before incision) and the other receiving surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the operating room (less than 30 minutes before incision). We expect a significantly lower rate of surgical site infections with surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis administered more than 30 minutes before the scheduled incision. The primary outcome is the occurrence of surgical site infections during a 30-day follow-up period (one year with an implant in place). When assuming a 5% surgical site infection risk with administration of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the operating room, the planned sample size has an 80% power to detect a relative risk reduction for surgical site infections of 33% when administering surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the anesthesia room (with a two-sided type I error of 5%). We expect the study to be completed within three years. DISCUSSION: The results of this randomized controlled trial will have an important impact on current international guidelines for infection control strategies in the hospital. Moreover, the results of this randomized controlled trial are of significant interest for patient safety and healthcare economics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT01790529. BioMed Central 2014-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4040488/ /pubmed/24885132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-188 Text en Copyright © 2014 Mujagic et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Mujagic, Edin Zwimpfer, Tibor Marti, Walter R Zwahlen, Marcel Hoffmann, Henry Kindler, Christoph Fux, Christoph Misteli, Heidi Iselin, Lukas Lugli, Andrea Kopp Nebiker, Christian A von Holzen, Urs Vinzens, Fabrizio von Strauss, Marco Reck, Stefan Kraljević, Marko Widmer, Andreas F Oertli, Daniel Rosenthal, Rachel Weber, Walter P Evaluating the optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Evaluating the optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Evaluating the optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Evaluating the optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | evaluating the optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4040488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-188 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mujagicedin evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zwimpfertibor evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT martiwalterr evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zwahlenmarcel evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hoffmannhenry evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kindlerchristoph evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fuxchristoph evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT misteliheidi evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT iselinlukas evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lugliandreakopp evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT nebikerchristiana evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vonholzenurs evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vinzensfabrizio evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vonstraussmarco evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT reckstefan evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kraljevicmarko evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT widmerandreasf evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT oertlidaniel evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rosenthalrachel evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT weberwalterp evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |