Cargando…

Evaluating the optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections are the most common hospital-acquired infections among surgical patients. The administration of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis reduces the risk of surgical site infections . The optimal timing of this procedure is still a matter of debate. While most studies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mujagic, Edin, Zwimpfer, Tibor, Marti, Walter R, Zwahlen, Marcel, Hoffmann, Henry, Kindler, Christoph, Fux, Christoph, Misteli, Heidi, Iselin, Lukas, Lugli, Andrea Kopp, Nebiker, Christian A, von Holzen, Urs, Vinzens, Fabrizio, von Strauss, Marco, Reck, Stefan, Kraljević, Marko, Widmer, Andreas F, Oertli, Daniel, Rosenthal, Rachel, Weber, Walter P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4040488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-188
_version_ 1782318579387990016
author Mujagic, Edin
Zwimpfer, Tibor
Marti, Walter R
Zwahlen, Marcel
Hoffmann, Henry
Kindler, Christoph
Fux, Christoph
Misteli, Heidi
Iselin, Lukas
Lugli, Andrea Kopp
Nebiker, Christian A
von Holzen, Urs
Vinzens, Fabrizio
von Strauss, Marco
Reck, Stefan
Kraljević, Marko
Widmer, Andreas F
Oertli, Daniel
Rosenthal, Rachel
Weber, Walter P
author_facet Mujagic, Edin
Zwimpfer, Tibor
Marti, Walter R
Zwahlen, Marcel
Hoffmann, Henry
Kindler, Christoph
Fux, Christoph
Misteli, Heidi
Iselin, Lukas
Lugli, Andrea Kopp
Nebiker, Christian A
von Holzen, Urs
Vinzens, Fabrizio
von Strauss, Marco
Reck, Stefan
Kraljević, Marko
Widmer, Andreas F
Oertli, Daniel
Rosenthal, Rachel
Weber, Walter P
author_sort Mujagic, Edin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections are the most common hospital-acquired infections among surgical patients. The administration of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis reduces the risk of surgical site infections . The optimal timing of this procedure is still a matter of debate. While most studies suggest that it should be given as close to the incision time as possible, others conclude that this may be too late for optimal prevention of surgical site infections. A large observational study suggests that surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis should be administered 74 to 30 minutes before surgery. The aim of this article is to report the design and protocol of a randomized controlled trial investigating the optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis. METHODS/DESIGN: In this bi-center randomized controlled trial conducted at two tertiary referral centers in Switzerland, we plan to include 5,000 patients undergoing general, oncologic, vascular and orthopedic trauma procedures. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: one receiving surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the anesthesia room (75 to 30 minutes before incision) and the other receiving surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the operating room (less than 30 minutes before incision). We expect a significantly lower rate of surgical site infections with surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis administered more than 30 minutes before the scheduled incision. The primary outcome is the occurrence of surgical site infections during a 30-day follow-up period (one year with an implant in place). When assuming a 5% surgical site infection risk with administration of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the operating room, the planned sample size has an 80% power to detect a relative risk reduction for surgical site infections of 33% when administering surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the anesthesia room (with a two-sided type I error of 5%). We expect the study to be completed within three years. DISCUSSION: The results of this randomized controlled trial will have an important impact on current international guidelines for infection control strategies in the hospital. Moreover, the results of this randomized controlled trial are of significant interest for patient safety and healthcare economics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT01790529.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4040488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40404882014-06-03 Evaluating the optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Mujagic, Edin Zwimpfer, Tibor Marti, Walter R Zwahlen, Marcel Hoffmann, Henry Kindler, Christoph Fux, Christoph Misteli, Heidi Iselin, Lukas Lugli, Andrea Kopp Nebiker, Christian A von Holzen, Urs Vinzens, Fabrizio von Strauss, Marco Reck, Stefan Kraljević, Marko Widmer, Andreas F Oertli, Daniel Rosenthal, Rachel Weber, Walter P Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections are the most common hospital-acquired infections among surgical patients. The administration of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis reduces the risk of surgical site infections . The optimal timing of this procedure is still a matter of debate. While most studies suggest that it should be given as close to the incision time as possible, others conclude that this may be too late for optimal prevention of surgical site infections. A large observational study suggests that surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis should be administered 74 to 30 minutes before surgery. The aim of this article is to report the design and protocol of a randomized controlled trial investigating the optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis. METHODS/DESIGN: In this bi-center randomized controlled trial conducted at two tertiary referral centers in Switzerland, we plan to include 5,000 patients undergoing general, oncologic, vascular and orthopedic trauma procedures. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: one receiving surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the anesthesia room (75 to 30 minutes before incision) and the other receiving surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the operating room (less than 30 minutes before incision). We expect a significantly lower rate of surgical site infections with surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis administered more than 30 minutes before the scheduled incision. The primary outcome is the occurrence of surgical site infections during a 30-day follow-up period (one year with an implant in place). When assuming a 5% surgical site infection risk with administration of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the operating room, the planned sample size has an 80% power to detect a relative risk reduction for surgical site infections of 33% when administering surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the anesthesia room (with a two-sided type I error of 5%). We expect the study to be completed within three years. DISCUSSION: The results of this randomized controlled trial will have an important impact on current international guidelines for infection control strategies in the hospital. Moreover, the results of this randomized controlled trial are of significant interest for patient safety and healthcare economics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT01790529. BioMed Central 2014-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4040488/ /pubmed/24885132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-188 Text en Copyright © 2014 Mujagic et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Mujagic, Edin
Zwimpfer, Tibor
Marti, Walter R
Zwahlen, Marcel
Hoffmann, Henry
Kindler, Christoph
Fux, Christoph
Misteli, Heidi
Iselin, Lukas
Lugli, Andrea Kopp
Nebiker, Christian A
von Holzen, Urs
Vinzens, Fabrizio
von Strauss, Marco
Reck, Stefan
Kraljević, Marko
Widmer, Andreas F
Oertli, Daniel
Rosenthal, Rachel
Weber, Walter P
Evaluating the optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Evaluating the optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Evaluating the optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Evaluating the optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Evaluating the optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort evaluating the optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4040488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-188
work_keys_str_mv AT mujagicedin evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zwimpfertibor evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT martiwalterr evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zwahlenmarcel evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hoffmannhenry evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kindlerchristoph evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fuxchristoph evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT misteliheidi evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT iselinlukas evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lugliandreakopp evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nebikerchristiana evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vonholzenurs evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vinzensfabrizio evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vonstraussmarco evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT reckstefan evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kraljevicmarko evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT widmerandreasf evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT oertlidaniel evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rosenthalrachel evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT weberwalterp evaluatingtheoptimaltimingofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxisstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial