Cargando…
Eukaryotic and archaeal TBP and TFB/TF(II)B follow different promoter DNA bending pathways
During transcription initiation, the promoter DNA is recognized and bent by the basal transcription factor TATA-binding protein (TBP). Subsequent association of transcription factor B (TFB) with the TBP–DNA complex is followed by the recruitment of the ribonucleic acid polymerase resulting in the fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4041446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24744242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku273 |
_version_ | 1782318678621028352 |
---|---|
author | Gietl, Andreas Holzmeister, Phil Blombach, Fabian Schulz, Sarah von Voithenberg, Lena Voith Lamb, Don C. Werner, Finn Tinnefeld, Philip Grohmann, Dina |
author_facet | Gietl, Andreas Holzmeister, Phil Blombach, Fabian Schulz, Sarah von Voithenberg, Lena Voith Lamb, Don C. Werner, Finn Tinnefeld, Philip Grohmann, Dina |
author_sort | Gietl, Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | During transcription initiation, the promoter DNA is recognized and bent by the basal transcription factor TATA-binding protein (TBP). Subsequent association of transcription factor B (TFB) with the TBP–DNA complex is followed by the recruitment of the ribonucleic acid polymerase resulting in the formation of the pre-initiation complex. TBP and TFB/TF(II)B are highly conserved in structure and function among the eukaryotic-archaeal domain but intriguingly have to operate under vastly different conditions. Employing single-pair fluorescence resonance energy transfer, we monitored DNA bending by eukaryotic and archaeal TBPs in the absence and presence of TFB in real-time. We observed that the lifetime of the TBP–DNA interaction differs significantly between the archaeal and eukaryotic system. We show that the eukaryotic DNA-TBP interaction is characterized by a linear, stepwise bending mechanism with an intermediate state distinguished by a distinct bending angle. TF(II)B specifically stabilizes the fully bent TBP–promoter DNA complex and we identify this step as a regulatory checkpoint. In contrast, the archaeal TBP–DNA interaction is extremely dynamic and TBP from the archaeal organism Sulfolobus acidocaldarius strictly requires TFB for DNA bending. Thus, we demonstrate that transcription initiation follows diverse pathways on the way to the formation of the pre-initiation complex. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4041446 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40414462014-06-11 Eukaryotic and archaeal TBP and TFB/TF(II)B follow different promoter DNA bending pathways Gietl, Andreas Holzmeister, Phil Blombach, Fabian Schulz, Sarah von Voithenberg, Lena Voith Lamb, Don C. Werner, Finn Tinnefeld, Philip Grohmann, Dina Nucleic Acids Res Gene regulation, Chromatin and Epigenetics During transcription initiation, the promoter DNA is recognized and bent by the basal transcription factor TATA-binding protein (TBP). Subsequent association of transcription factor B (TFB) with the TBP–DNA complex is followed by the recruitment of the ribonucleic acid polymerase resulting in the formation of the pre-initiation complex. TBP and TFB/TF(II)B are highly conserved in structure and function among the eukaryotic-archaeal domain but intriguingly have to operate under vastly different conditions. Employing single-pair fluorescence resonance energy transfer, we monitored DNA bending by eukaryotic and archaeal TBPs in the absence and presence of TFB in real-time. We observed that the lifetime of the TBP–DNA interaction differs significantly between the archaeal and eukaryotic system. We show that the eukaryotic DNA-TBP interaction is characterized by a linear, stepwise bending mechanism with an intermediate state distinguished by a distinct bending angle. TF(II)B specifically stabilizes the fully bent TBP–promoter DNA complex and we identify this step as a regulatory checkpoint. In contrast, the archaeal TBP–DNA interaction is extremely dynamic and TBP from the archaeal organism Sulfolobus acidocaldarius strictly requires TFB for DNA bending. Thus, we demonstrate that transcription initiation follows diverse pathways on the way to the formation of the pre-initiation complex. Oxford University Press 2014-06-01 2014-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4041446/ /pubmed/24744242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku273 Text en © The Author(s) 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Gene regulation, Chromatin and Epigenetics Gietl, Andreas Holzmeister, Phil Blombach, Fabian Schulz, Sarah von Voithenberg, Lena Voith Lamb, Don C. Werner, Finn Tinnefeld, Philip Grohmann, Dina Eukaryotic and archaeal TBP and TFB/TF(II)B follow different promoter DNA bending pathways |
title | Eukaryotic and archaeal TBP and TFB/TF(II)B follow different promoter DNA bending pathways |
title_full | Eukaryotic and archaeal TBP and TFB/TF(II)B follow different promoter DNA bending pathways |
title_fullStr | Eukaryotic and archaeal TBP and TFB/TF(II)B follow different promoter DNA bending pathways |
title_full_unstemmed | Eukaryotic and archaeal TBP and TFB/TF(II)B follow different promoter DNA bending pathways |
title_short | Eukaryotic and archaeal TBP and TFB/TF(II)B follow different promoter DNA bending pathways |
title_sort | eukaryotic and archaeal tbp and tfb/tf(ii)b follow different promoter dna bending pathways |
topic | Gene regulation, Chromatin and Epigenetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4041446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24744242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku273 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gietlandreas eukaryoticandarchaealtbpandtfbtfiibfollowdifferentpromoterdnabendingpathways AT holzmeisterphil eukaryoticandarchaealtbpandtfbtfiibfollowdifferentpromoterdnabendingpathways AT blombachfabian eukaryoticandarchaealtbpandtfbtfiibfollowdifferentpromoterdnabendingpathways AT schulzsarah eukaryoticandarchaealtbpandtfbtfiibfollowdifferentpromoterdnabendingpathways AT vonvoithenberglenavoith eukaryoticandarchaealtbpandtfbtfiibfollowdifferentpromoterdnabendingpathways AT lambdonc eukaryoticandarchaealtbpandtfbtfiibfollowdifferentpromoterdnabendingpathways AT wernerfinn eukaryoticandarchaealtbpandtfbtfiibfollowdifferentpromoterdnabendingpathways AT tinnefeldphilip eukaryoticandarchaealtbpandtfbtfiibfollowdifferentpromoterdnabendingpathways AT grohmanndina eukaryoticandarchaealtbpandtfbtfiibfollowdifferentpromoterdnabendingpathways |