Cargando…
The Dominance Concept Inventory: A Tool for Assessing Undergraduate Student Alternative Conceptions about Dominance in Mendelian and Population Genetics
Despite the impact of genetics on daily life, biology undergraduates understand some key genetics concepts poorly. One concept requiring attention is dominance, which many students understand as a fixed property of an allele or trait and regularly conflate with frequency in a population or selective...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Cell Biology
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4041511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26086665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-08-0160 |
_version_ | 1782318689776828416 |
---|---|
author | Abraham, Joel K. Perez, Kathryn E. Price, Rebecca M. |
author_facet | Abraham, Joel K. Perez, Kathryn E. Price, Rebecca M. |
author_sort | Abraham, Joel K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite the impact of genetics on daily life, biology undergraduates understand some key genetics concepts poorly. One concept requiring attention is dominance, which many students understand as a fixed property of an allele or trait and regularly conflate with frequency in a population or selective advantage. We present the Dominance Concept Inventory (DCI), an instrument to gather data on selected alternative conceptions about dominance. During development of the 16-item test, we used expert surveys (n = 12), student interviews (n = 42), and field tests (n = 1763) from introductory and advanced biology undergraduates at public and private, majority- and minority-serving, 2- and 4-yr institutions in the United States. In the final field test across all subject populations (n = 709), item difficulty ranged from 0.08 to 0.84 (0.51 ± 0.049 SEM), while item discrimination ranged from 0.11 to 0.82 (0.50 ± 0.048 SEM). Internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.77, while test–retest reliability values were 0.74 (product moment correlation) and 0.77 (intraclass correlation). The prevalence of alternative conceptions in the field tests shows that introductory and advanced students retain confusion about dominance after instruction. All measures support the DCI as a useful instrument for measuring undergraduate biology student understanding and alternative conceptions about dominance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4041511 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | American Society for Cell Biology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40415112014-06-06 The Dominance Concept Inventory: A Tool for Assessing Undergraduate Student Alternative Conceptions about Dominance in Mendelian and Population Genetics Abraham, Joel K. Perez, Kathryn E. Price, Rebecca M. CBE Life Sci Educ Articles Despite the impact of genetics on daily life, biology undergraduates understand some key genetics concepts poorly. One concept requiring attention is dominance, which many students understand as a fixed property of an allele or trait and regularly conflate with frequency in a population or selective advantage. We present the Dominance Concept Inventory (DCI), an instrument to gather data on selected alternative conceptions about dominance. During development of the 16-item test, we used expert surveys (n = 12), student interviews (n = 42), and field tests (n = 1763) from introductory and advanced biology undergraduates at public and private, majority- and minority-serving, 2- and 4-yr institutions in the United States. In the final field test across all subject populations (n = 709), item difficulty ranged from 0.08 to 0.84 (0.51 ± 0.049 SEM), while item discrimination ranged from 0.11 to 0.82 (0.50 ± 0.048 SEM). Internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.77, while test–retest reliability values were 0.74 (product moment correlation) and 0.77 (intraclass correlation). The prevalence of alternative conceptions in the field tests shows that introductory and advanced students retain confusion about dominance after instruction. All measures support the DCI as a useful instrument for measuring undergraduate biology student understanding and alternative conceptions about dominance. American Society for Cell Biology 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4041511/ /pubmed/26086665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-08-0160 Text en © 2014 J. K. Abraham et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2014 The American Society for Cell Biology. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0). “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society of Cell Biology. |
spellingShingle | Articles Abraham, Joel K. Perez, Kathryn E. Price, Rebecca M. The Dominance Concept Inventory: A Tool for Assessing Undergraduate Student Alternative Conceptions about Dominance in Mendelian and Population Genetics |
title | The Dominance Concept Inventory: A Tool for Assessing Undergraduate Student Alternative Conceptions about Dominance in Mendelian and Population Genetics |
title_full | The Dominance Concept Inventory: A Tool for Assessing Undergraduate Student Alternative Conceptions about Dominance in Mendelian and Population Genetics |
title_fullStr | The Dominance Concept Inventory: A Tool for Assessing Undergraduate Student Alternative Conceptions about Dominance in Mendelian and Population Genetics |
title_full_unstemmed | The Dominance Concept Inventory: A Tool for Assessing Undergraduate Student Alternative Conceptions about Dominance in Mendelian and Population Genetics |
title_short | The Dominance Concept Inventory: A Tool for Assessing Undergraduate Student Alternative Conceptions about Dominance in Mendelian and Population Genetics |
title_sort | dominance concept inventory: a tool for assessing undergraduate student alternative conceptions about dominance in mendelian and population genetics |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4041511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26086665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-08-0160 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abrahamjoelk thedominanceconceptinventoryatoolforassessingundergraduatestudentalternativeconceptionsaboutdominanceinmendelianandpopulationgenetics AT perezkathryne thedominanceconceptinventoryatoolforassessingundergraduatestudentalternativeconceptionsaboutdominanceinmendelianandpopulationgenetics AT pricerebeccam thedominanceconceptinventoryatoolforassessingundergraduatestudentalternativeconceptionsaboutdominanceinmendelianandpopulationgenetics AT abrahamjoelk dominanceconceptinventoryatoolforassessingundergraduatestudentalternativeconceptionsaboutdominanceinmendelianandpopulationgenetics AT perezkathryne dominanceconceptinventoryatoolforassessingundergraduatestudentalternativeconceptionsaboutdominanceinmendelianandpopulationgenetics AT pricerebeccam dominanceconceptinventoryatoolforassessingundergraduatestudentalternativeconceptionsaboutdominanceinmendelianandpopulationgenetics |