Cargando…

Cost analysis of the stroke volume variation guided perioperative hemodynamic optimization – an economic evaluation of the SVVOPT trial results

BACKGROUND: Perioperative goal directed therapy (GDT) can substantially improve the outcomes of high risk surgical patients as shown by many clinical studies. However, the approach needs initial investment and can increase the already very high staff workload. These economic imperatives may be at le...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benes, Jan, Zatloukal, Jan, Simanova, Alena, Chytra, Ivan, Kasal, Eduard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4041635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24891837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-40
_version_ 1782318698119299072
author Benes, Jan
Zatloukal, Jan
Simanova, Alena
Chytra, Ivan
Kasal, Eduard
author_facet Benes, Jan
Zatloukal, Jan
Simanova, Alena
Chytra, Ivan
Kasal, Eduard
author_sort Benes, Jan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Perioperative goal directed therapy (GDT) can substantially improve the outcomes of high risk surgical patients as shown by many clinical studies. However, the approach needs initial investment and can increase the already very high staff workload. These economic imperatives may be at least partly responsible for weak adherence to the GDT concept. A few models are available for the evaluation of GDT cost-effectiveness, but studies of real economic data based on a recent clinical trial are lacking. In order to address this we have performed a retrospective analysis of the data from the “Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients” trial (ISRCTN95085011). METHODS: The health-care payers perspective was used in order to evaluate the perioperative hemodynamic optimization costs. Hospital invoices from all patients included in the trial were extracted. A direct comparison between the study (GDT, N = 60) and control (N = 60) groups was performed. A cost tree was constructed and major cost drivers evaluated. RESULTS: The trial showed a significant improvement in clinical outcomes for GDT treated patients. The mean cost per patient were lower in the GDT group 2877 ± 2336€ vs. 3371 ± 3238€ in controls, but without reaching a statistical significance (p = 0.596). The mean cost of all items except for intraoperative monitoring and infusions were lower for GDT than control but due to the high variability they all failed to reach statistical significance. Those costs associated with clinical care (68 ± 177€ vs. 212 ± 593€; p = 0.023) and ward stay costs (213 ± 108€ vs. 349 ± 467€; p = 0.082) were the most important differences in favour of the GDT group. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative fluid optimization with the use of stroke volume variation and Vigileo/FloTrac system showed not only a substantial improvement of morbidity, but was associated with an economic benefit. The cost-savings observed in the overall costs of postoperative care trend to offset the investment needed to run the GDT strategy and intraoperative monitoring. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN95085011
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4041635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40416352014-06-03 Cost analysis of the stroke volume variation guided perioperative hemodynamic optimization – an economic evaluation of the SVVOPT trial results Benes, Jan Zatloukal, Jan Simanova, Alena Chytra, Ivan Kasal, Eduard BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Perioperative goal directed therapy (GDT) can substantially improve the outcomes of high risk surgical patients as shown by many clinical studies. However, the approach needs initial investment and can increase the already very high staff workload. These economic imperatives may be at least partly responsible for weak adherence to the GDT concept. A few models are available for the evaluation of GDT cost-effectiveness, but studies of real economic data based on a recent clinical trial are lacking. In order to address this we have performed a retrospective analysis of the data from the “Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients” trial (ISRCTN95085011). METHODS: The health-care payers perspective was used in order to evaluate the perioperative hemodynamic optimization costs. Hospital invoices from all patients included in the trial were extracted. A direct comparison between the study (GDT, N = 60) and control (N = 60) groups was performed. A cost tree was constructed and major cost drivers evaluated. RESULTS: The trial showed a significant improvement in clinical outcomes for GDT treated patients. The mean cost per patient were lower in the GDT group 2877 ± 2336€ vs. 3371 ± 3238€ in controls, but without reaching a statistical significance (p = 0.596). The mean cost of all items except for intraoperative monitoring and infusions were lower for GDT than control but due to the high variability they all failed to reach statistical significance. Those costs associated with clinical care (68 ± 177€ vs. 212 ± 593€; p = 0.023) and ward stay costs (213 ± 108€ vs. 349 ± 467€; p = 0.082) were the most important differences in favour of the GDT group. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative fluid optimization with the use of stroke volume variation and Vigileo/FloTrac system showed not only a substantial improvement of morbidity, but was associated with an economic benefit. The cost-savings observed in the overall costs of postoperative care trend to offset the investment needed to run the GDT strategy and intraoperative monitoring. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN95085011 BioMed Central 2014-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4041635/ /pubmed/24891837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-40 Text en Copyright © 2014 Benes et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Benes, Jan
Zatloukal, Jan
Simanova, Alena
Chytra, Ivan
Kasal, Eduard
Cost analysis of the stroke volume variation guided perioperative hemodynamic optimization – an economic evaluation of the SVVOPT trial results
title Cost analysis of the stroke volume variation guided perioperative hemodynamic optimization – an economic evaluation of the SVVOPT trial results
title_full Cost analysis of the stroke volume variation guided perioperative hemodynamic optimization – an economic evaluation of the SVVOPT trial results
title_fullStr Cost analysis of the stroke volume variation guided perioperative hemodynamic optimization – an economic evaluation of the SVVOPT trial results
title_full_unstemmed Cost analysis of the stroke volume variation guided perioperative hemodynamic optimization – an economic evaluation of the SVVOPT trial results
title_short Cost analysis of the stroke volume variation guided perioperative hemodynamic optimization – an economic evaluation of the SVVOPT trial results
title_sort cost analysis of the stroke volume variation guided perioperative hemodynamic optimization – an economic evaluation of the svvopt trial results
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4041635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24891837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-40
work_keys_str_mv AT benesjan costanalysisofthestrokevolumevariationguidedperioperativehemodynamicoptimizationaneconomicevaluationofthesvvopttrialresults
AT zatloukaljan costanalysisofthestrokevolumevariationguidedperioperativehemodynamicoptimizationaneconomicevaluationofthesvvopttrialresults
AT simanovaalena costanalysisofthestrokevolumevariationguidedperioperativehemodynamicoptimizationaneconomicevaluationofthesvvopttrialresults
AT chytraivan costanalysisofthestrokevolumevariationguidedperioperativehemodynamicoptimizationaneconomicevaluationofthesvvopttrialresults
AT kasaleduard costanalysisofthestrokevolumevariationguidedperioperativehemodynamicoptimizationaneconomicevaluationofthesvvopttrialresults