Cargando…
Intratumoral distribution of EGFR mutations and copy number in metastatic lung cancer, what impact on the initial molecular diagnosis?
BACKGROUND: Activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations characterize a subgroup of non-small-cell lung cancer that benefit from first line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI). However, the existence of polyclonal cell populations may hinder personalized-medicine strategies as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4041917/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-12-131 |
_version_ | 1782318736548560896 |
---|---|
author | Mansuet-Lupo, Audrey Zouiti, Fouzia Alifano, Marco Tallet, Anne Charpentier, Marie-Christine Ducruit, Véronique Devez, Fabrice Lemaitre, Fanny Laurent-Puig, Pierre Damotte, Diane Blons, Hélène |
author_facet | Mansuet-Lupo, Audrey Zouiti, Fouzia Alifano, Marco Tallet, Anne Charpentier, Marie-Christine Ducruit, Véronique Devez, Fabrice Lemaitre, Fanny Laurent-Puig, Pierre Damotte, Diane Blons, Hélène |
author_sort | Mansuet-Lupo, Audrey |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations characterize a subgroup of non-small-cell lung cancer that benefit from first line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI). However, the existence of polyclonal cell populations may hinder personalized-medicine strategies as patients’ screening often depends upon a single tumor-biopsy sample. The purpose of this study is to clarify and to validate in clinical testing conditions the accuracy of EGFR genotyping using different tumor sites and various types of samples (transthoracic, surgical or endoscopic biopsies and cytology specimens). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 357 consecutive patients addressed for EGFR mutation screening in accordance with the directive of the European Medicines Agency (stage IV NSCLC). Fifty-seven samples were EGFR mutated and 40 had adequate tumor specimens for analysis on multiple spatially separated sites. Ten wild type samples were also analyzed. A total of 153 and 39 tumor fragments, from mutated and non-mutated cases respectively, were generated to analyze tumor heterogeneity or primary-metastatic discordances. After histological review of all fragments, EGFR genotyping was assessed using the routine diagnostic tools: fragment analysis for insertions and deletions and allele specific TaqMan probes for point mutations. EGFR copy number (CN) was evaluated by qPCR using TaqMan probes. RESULTS: The identification of EGFR mutations was independent of localization within primary tumor, of specimen type and consistent between primary and metastases. At the opposite, for half of the samples, tumor loci showed different EGFR copy number that may affect mutation detection cut-off. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest series reporting multiple EGFR testing in Caucasians. It validates the accuracy of EGFR mutation screening from single tumor-biopsy samples before first line EGFR-TKI. The unpredictable variability in EGFR CN and therefore in EGFR wild type/mutant allelic ratio justifies the implementation of sensitive methods to identify patients with EGFR mutated tumors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4041917 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40419172014-06-04 Intratumoral distribution of EGFR mutations and copy number in metastatic lung cancer, what impact on the initial molecular diagnosis? Mansuet-Lupo, Audrey Zouiti, Fouzia Alifano, Marco Tallet, Anne Charpentier, Marie-Christine Ducruit, Véronique Devez, Fabrice Lemaitre, Fanny Laurent-Puig, Pierre Damotte, Diane Blons, Hélène J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: Activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations characterize a subgroup of non-small-cell lung cancer that benefit from first line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI). However, the existence of polyclonal cell populations may hinder personalized-medicine strategies as patients’ screening often depends upon a single tumor-biopsy sample. The purpose of this study is to clarify and to validate in clinical testing conditions the accuracy of EGFR genotyping using different tumor sites and various types of samples (transthoracic, surgical or endoscopic biopsies and cytology specimens). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 357 consecutive patients addressed for EGFR mutation screening in accordance with the directive of the European Medicines Agency (stage IV NSCLC). Fifty-seven samples were EGFR mutated and 40 had adequate tumor specimens for analysis on multiple spatially separated sites. Ten wild type samples were also analyzed. A total of 153 and 39 tumor fragments, from mutated and non-mutated cases respectively, were generated to analyze tumor heterogeneity or primary-metastatic discordances. After histological review of all fragments, EGFR genotyping was assessed using the routine diagnostic tools: fragment analysis for insertions and deletions and allele specific TaqMan probes for point mutations. EGFR copy number (CN) was evaluated by qPCR using TaqMan probes. RESULTS: The identification of EGFR mutations was independent of localization within primary tumor, of specimen type and consistent between primary and metastases. At the opposite, for half of the samples, tumor loci showed different EGFR copy number that may affect mutation detection cut-off. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest series reporting multiple EGFR testing in Caucasians. It validates the accuracy of EGFR mutation screening from single tumor-biopsy samples before first line EGFR-TKI. The unpredictable variability in EGFR CN and therefore in EGFR wild type/mutant allelic ratio justifies the implementation of sensitive methods to identify patients with EGFR mutated tumors. BioMed Central 2014-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4041917/ /pubmed/24885034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-12-131 Text en Copyright © 2014 Mansuet-Lupo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Mansuet-Lupo, Audrey Zouiti, Fouzia Alifano, Marco Tallet, Anne Charpentier, Marie-Christine Ducruit, Véronique Devez, Fabrice Lemaitre, Fanny Laurent-Puig, Pierre Damotte, Diane Blons, Hélène Intratumoral distribution of EGFR mutations and copy number in metastatic lung cancer, what impact on the initial molecular diagnosis? |
title | Intratumoral distribution of EGFR mutations and copy number in metastatic lung cancer, what impact on the initial molecular diagnosis? |
title_full | Intratumoral distribution of EGFR mutations and copy number in metastatic lung cancer, what impact on the initial molecular diagnosis? |
title_fullStr | Intratumoral distribution of EGFR mutations and copy number in metastatic lung cancer, what impact on the initial molecular diagnosis? |
title_full_unstemmed | Intratumoral distribution of EGFR mutations and copy number in metastatic lung cancer, what impact on the initial molecular diagnosis? |
title_short | Intratumoral distribution of EGFR mutations and copy number in metastatic lung cancer, what impact on the initial molecular diagnosis? |
title_sort | intratumoral distribution of egfr mutations and copy number in metastatic lung cancer, what impact on the initial molecular diagnosis? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4041917/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-12-131 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mansuetlupoaudrey intratumoraldistributionofegfrmutationsandcopynumberinmetastaticlungcancerwhatimpactontheinitialmoleculardiagnosis AT zouitifouzia intratumoraldistributionofegfrmutationsandcopynumberinmetastaticlungcancerwhatimpactontheinitialmoleculardiagnosis AT alifanomarco intratumoraldistributionofegfrmutationsandcopynumberinmetastaticlungcancerwhatimpactontheinitialmoleculardiagnosis AT talletanne intratumoraldistributionofegfrmutationsandcopynumberinmetastaticlungcancerwhatimpactontheinitialmoleculardiagnosis AT charpentiermariechristine intratumoraldistributionofegfrmutationsandcopynumberinmetastaticlungcancerwhatimpactontheinitialmoleculardiagnosis AT ducruitveronique intratumoraldistributionofegfrmutationsandcopynumberinmetastaticlungcancerwhatimpactontheinitialmoleculardiagnosis AT devezfabrice intratumoraldistributionofegfrmutationsandcopynumberinmetastaticlungcancerwhatimpactontheinitialmoleculardiagnosis AT lemaitrefanny intratumoraldistributionofegfrmutationsandcopynumberinmetastaticlungcancerwhatimpactontheinitialmoleculardiagnosis AT laurentpuigpierre intratumoraldistributionofegfrmutationsandcopynumberinmetastaticlungcancerwhatimpactontheinitialmoleculardiagnosis AT damottediane intratumoraldistributionofegfrmutationsandcopynumberinmetastaticlungcancerwhatimpactontheinitialmoleculardiagnosis AT blonshelene intratumoraldistributionofegfrmutationsandcopynumberinmetastaticlungcancerwhatimpactontheinitialmoleculardiagnosis |