Cargando…
Endocardial Lead Extraction in the Polish Registry – clinical practice versus current Heart Rhythm Society consensus
INTRODUCTION: Over the last 10 years, there has been an increasing number of patients with pacemaker (PM) and cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). This study is a retrospective analysis of indications for endocardial pacemaker and ICD lead extractions between 2003 and 2009 based on the experience of th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4042036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904658 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2013.33434 |
_version_ | 1782318749928390656 |
---|---|
author | Chudzik, Michał Kutarski, Andrzej Mitkowski, Przemysław Przybylski, Andrzej Lewek, Joanna Małecka, Barbara Smukowski, Tomasz Maciąg, Aleksander Śmigielski, Janusz |
author_facet | Chudzik, Michał Kutarski, Andrzej Mitkowski, Przemysław Przybylski, Andrzej Lewek, Joanna Małecka, Barbara Smukowski, Tomasz Maciąg, Aleksander Śmigielski, Janusz |
author_sort | Chudzik, Michał |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Over the last 10 years, there has been an increasing number of patients with pacemaker (PM) and cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). This study is a retrospective analysis of indications for endocardial pacemaker and ICD lead extractions between 2003 and 2009 based on the experience of three Polish Referral Lead Extraction Centers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Since 2003, the authors have consecutively retrospectively collected all cases and entered the information in the database. All patients which had indication for lead extraction according to Heart Rhythm Society Guidelines were included to final analyze. Between 2003 and 2005, the data were analyzed together. Since 2006, data have been collected and analyzed annually. RESULTS: In each year, a significant increase in lead extraction was observed. The main indications for LE were infections in 52.4% of patients. Nonfunctioning lead extraction constituted the second group of indications for LE in 29.7% of patients. During the registry period, the percentage of class I indications decreased from 80% in 2006 to only 47% in 2009. On the other hand, increasingly more leads were removed because of class 2, especially class 2b. In 2009, 40% of leads were extracted due to class 2b. CONCLUSIONS: Polish Registry of Endocardial Lead Extraction 2003-2009, shows an increasing frequency of lead extraction. The main indication for LE is infection: systemic and pocket. An increase in class 2, especially 2b, LE indication in every center during the study period was found. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4042036 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40420362014-06-05 Endocardial Lead Extraction in the Polish Registry – clinical practice versus current Heart Rhythm Society consensus Chudzik, Michał Kutarski, Andrzej Mitkowski, Przemysław Przybylski, Andrzej Lewek, Joanna Małecka, Barbara Smukowski, Tomasz Maciąg, Aleksander Śmigielski, Janusz Arch Med Sci Clinical Research INTRODUCTION: Over the last 10 years, there has been an increasing number of patients with pacemaker (PM) and cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). This study is a retrospective analysis of indications for endocardial pacemaker and ICD lead extractions between 2003 and 2009 based on the experience of three Polish Referral Lead Extraction Centers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Since 2003, the authors have consecutively retrospectively collected all cases and entered the information in the database. All patients which had indication for lead extraction according to Heart Rhythm Society Guidelines were included to final analyze. Between 2003 and 2005, the data were analyzed together. Since 2006, data have been collected and analyzed annually. RESULTS: In each year, a significant increase in lead extraction was observed. The main indications for LE were infections in 52.4% of patients. Nonfunctioning lead extraction constituted the second group of indications for LE in 29.7% of patients. During the registry period, the percentage of class I indications decreased from 80% in 2006 to only 47% in 2009. On the other hand, increasingly more leads were removed because of class 2, especially class 2b. In 2009, 40% of leads were extracted due to class 2b. CONCLUSIONS: Polish Registry of Endocardial Lead Extraction 2003-2009, shows an increasing frequency of lead extraction. The main indication for LE is infection: systemic and pocket. An increase in class 2, especially 2b, LE indication in every center during the study period was found. Termedia Publishing House 2013-03-06 2014-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4042036/ /pubmed/24904658 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2013.33434 Text en Copyright © 2014 Termedia & Banach http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Chudzik, Michał Kutarski, Andrzej Mitkowski, Przemysław Przybylski, Andrzej Lewek, Joanna Małecka, Barbara Smukowski, Tomasz Maciąg, Aleksander Śmigielski, Janusz Endocardial Lead Extraction in the Polish Registry – clinical practice versus current Heart Rhythm Society consensus |
title | Endocardial Lead Extraction in the Polish Registry – clinical practice versus current Heart Rhythm Society consensus |
title_full | Endocardial Lead Extraction in the Polish Registry – clinical practice versus current Heart Rhythm Society consensus |
title_fullStr | Endocardial Lead Extraction in the Polish Registry – clinical practice versus current Heart Rhythm Society consensus |
title_full_unstemmed | Endocardial Lead Extraction in the Polish Registry – clinical practice versus current Heart Rhythm Society consensus |
title_short | Endocardial Lead Extraction in the Polish Registry – clinical practice versus current Heart Rhythm Society consensus |
title_sort | endocardial lead extraction in the polish registry – clinical practice versus current heart rhythm society consensus |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4042036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904658 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2013.33434 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chudzikmichał endocardialleadextractioninthepolishregistryclinicalpracticeversuscurrentheartrhythmsocietyconsensus AT kutarskiandrzej endocardialleadextractioninthepolishregistryclinicalpracticeversuscurrentheartrhythmsocietyconsensus AT mitkowskiprzemysław endocardialleadextractioninthepolishregistryclinicalpracticeversuscurrentheartrhythmsocietyconsensus AT przybylskiandrzej endocardialleadextractioninthepolishregistryclinicalpracticeversuscurrentheartrhythmsocietyconsensus AT lewekjoanna endocardialleadextractioninthepolishregistryclinicalpracticeversuscurrentheartrhythmsocietyconsensus AT małeckabarbara endocardialleadextractioninthepolishregistryclinicalpracticeversuscurrentheartrhythmsocietyconsensus AT smukowskitomasz endocardialleadextractioninthepolishregistryclinicalpracticeversuscurrentheartrhythmsocietyconsensus AT maciagaleksander endocardialleadextractioninthepolishregistryclinicalpracticeversuscurrentheartrhythmsocietyconsensus AT smigielskijanusz endocardialleadextractioninthepolishregistryclinicalpracticeversuscurrentheartrhythmsocietyconsensus |