Cargando…

Endocardial Lead Extraction in the Polish Registry – clinical practice versus current Heart Rhythm Society consensus

INTRODUCTION: Over the last 10 years, there has been an increasing number of patients with pacemaker (PM) and cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). This study is a retrospective analysis of indications for endocardial pacemaker and ICD lead extractions between 2003 and 2009 based on the experience of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chudzik, Michał, Kutarski, Andrzej, Mitkowski, Przemysław, Przybylski, Andrzej, Lewek, Joanna, Małecka, Barbara, Smukowski, Tomasz, Maciąg, Aleksander, Śmigielski, Janusz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4042036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904658
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2013.33434
_version_ 1782318749928390656
author Chudzik, Michał
Kutarski, Andrzej
Mitkowski, Przemysław
Przybylski, Andrzej
Lewek, Joanna
Małecka, Barbara
Smukowski, Tomasz
Maciąg, Aleksander
Śmigielski, Janusz
author_facet Chudzik, Michał
Kutarski, Andrzej
Mitkowski, Przemysław
Przybylski, Andrzej
Lewek, Joanna
Małecka, Barbara
Smukowski, Tomasz
Maciąg, Aleksander
Śmigielski, Janusz
author_sort Chudzik, Michał
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Over the last 10 years, there has been an increasing number of patients with pacemaker (PM) and cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). This study is a retrospective analysis of indications for endocardial pacemaker and ICD lead extractions between 2003 and 2009 based on the experience of three Polish Referral Lead Extraction Centers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Since 2003, the authors have consecutively retrospectively collected all cases and entered the information in the database. All patients which had indication for lead extraction according to Heart Rhythm Society Guidelines were included to final analyze. Between 2003 and 2005, the data were analyzed together. Since 2006, data have been collected and analyzed annually. RESULTS: In each year, a significant increase in lead extraction was observed. The main indications for LE were infections in 52.4% of patients. Nonfunctioning lead extraction constituted the second group of indications for LE in 29.7% of patients. During the registry period, the percentage of class I indications decreased from 80% in 2006 to only 47% in 2009. On the other hand, increasingly more leads were removed because of class 2, especially class 2b. In 2009, 40% of leads were extracted due to class 2b. CONCLUSIONS: Polish Registry of Endocardial Lead Extraction 2003-2009, shows an increasing frequency of lead extraction. The main indication for LE is infection: systemic and pocket. An increase in class 2, especially 2b, LE indication in every center during the study period was found.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4042036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40420362014-06-05 Endocardial Lead Extraction in the Polish Registry – clinical practice versus current Heart Rhythm Society consensus Chudzik, Michał Kutarski, Andrzej Mitkowski, Przemysław Przybylski, Andrzej Lewek, Joanna Małecka, Barbara Smukowski, Tomasz Maciąg, Aleksander Śmigielski, Janusz Arch Med Sci Clinical Research INTRODUCTION: Over the last 10 years, there has been an increasing number of patients with pacemaker (PM) and cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). This study is a retrospective analysis of indications for endocardial pacemaker and ICD lead extractions between 2003 and 2009 based on the experience of three Polish Referral Lead Extraction Centers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Since 2003, the authors have consecutively retrospectively collected all cases and entered the information in the database. All patients which had indication for lead extraction according to Heart Rhythm Society Guidelines were included to final analyze. Between 2003 and 2005, the data were analyzed together. Since 2006, data have been collected and analyzed annually. RESULTS: In each year, a significant increase in lead extraction was observed. The main indications for LE were infections in 52.4% of patients. Nonfunctioning lead extraction constituted the second group of indications for LE in 29.7% of patients. During the registry period, the percentage of class I indications decreased from 80% in 2006 to only 47% in 2009. On the other hand, increasingly more leads were removed because of class 2, especially class 2b. In 2009, 40% of leads were extracted due to class 2b. CONCLUSIONS: Polish Registry of Endocardial Lead Extraction 2003-2009, shows an increasing frequency of lead extraction. The main indication for LE is infection: systemic and pocket. An increase in class 2, especially 2b, LE indication in every center during the study period was found. Termedia Publishing House 2013-03-06 2014-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4042036/ /pubmed/24904658 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2013.33434 Text en Copyright © 2014 Termedia & Banach http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Chudzik, Michał
Kutarski, Andrzej
Mitkowski, Przemysław
Przybylski, Andrzej
Lewek, Joanna
Małecka, Barbara
Smukowski, Tomasz
Maciąg, Aleksander
Śmigielski, Janusz
Endocardial Lead Extraction in the Polish Registry – clinical practice versus current Heart Rhythm Society consensus
title Endocardial Lead Extraction in the Polish Registry – clinical practice versus current Heart Rhythm Society consensus
title_full Endocardial Lead Extraction in the Polish Registry – clinical practice versus current Heart Rhythm Society consensus
title_fullStr Endocardial Lead Extraction in the Polish Registry – clinical practice versus current Heart Rhythm Society consensus
title_full_unstemmed Endocardial Lead Extraction in the Polish Registry – clinical practice versus current Heart Rhythm Society consensus
title_short Endocardial Lead Extraction in the Polish Registry – clinical practice versus current Heart Rhythm Society consensus
title_sort endocardial lead extraction in the polish registry – clinical practice versus current heart rhythm society consensus
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4042036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904658
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2013.33434
work_keys_str_mv AT chudzikmichał endocardialleadextractioninthepolishregistryclinicalpracticeversuscurrentheartrhythmsocietyconsensus
AT kutarskiandrzej endocardialleadextractioninthepolishregistryclinicalpracticeversuscurrentheartrhythmsocietyconsensus
AT mitkowskiprzemysław endocardialleadextractioninthepolishregistryclinicalpracticeversuscurrentheartrhythmsocietyconsensus
AT przybylskiandrzej endocardialleadextractioninthepolishregistryclinicalpracticeversuscurrentheartrhythmsocietyconsensus
AT lewekjoanna endocardialleadextractioninthepolishregistryclinicalpracticeversuscurrentheartrhythmsocietyconsensus
AT małeckabarbara endocardialleadextractioninthepolishregistryclinicalpracticeversuscurrentheartrhythmsocietyconsensus
AT smukowskitomasz endocardialleadextractioninthepolishregistryclinicalpracticeversuscurrentheartrhythmsocietyconsensus
AT maciagaleksander endocardialleadextractioninthepolishregistryclinicalpracticeversuscurrentheartrhythmsocietyconsensus
AT smigielskijanusz endocardialleadextractioninthepolishregistryclinicalpracticeversuscurrentheartrhythmsocietyconsensus