Cargando…

QChIPat: a quantitative method to identify distinct binding patterns for two biological ChIP-seq samples in different experimental conditions

BACKGROUND: Many computational programs have been developed to identify enriched regions for a single biological ChIP-seq sample. Given that many biological questions are often asked to compare the difference between two different conditions, it is important to develop new programs that address the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Bin, Yi, Jimmy, SV, Aishwarya, Lan, Xun, Ma, Yilin, Huang, Tim HM, Leone, Gustavo, Jin, Victor X
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4042236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24564479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-S8-S3
_version_ 1782318777883426816
author Liu, Bin
Yi, Jimmy
SV, Aishwarya
Lan, Xun
Ma, Yilin
Huang, Tim HM
Leone, Gustavo
Jin, Victor X
author_facet Liu, Bin
Yi, Jimmy
SV, Aishwarya
Lan, Xun
Ma, Yilin
Huang, Tim HM
Leone, Gustavo
Jin, Victor X
author_sort Liu, Bin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many computational programs have been developed to identify enriched regions for a single biological ChIP-seq sample. Given that many biological questions are often asked to compare the difference between two different conditions, it is important to develop new programs that address the comparison of two biological ChIP-seq samples. Despite several programs designed to address this question, these programs suffer from some drawbacks, such as inability to distinguish whether the identified differential enriched regions are indeed significantly enriched, lack of distinguishing binding patterns, and neglect of the normalization between samples. RESULTS: In this study, we developed a novel quantitative method for comparing two biological ChIP-seq samples, called QChIPat. Our method employs a new global normalization method: nonparametric empirical Bayes (NEB) correction normalization, utilizes pre-defined enriched regions identified from single-sample peak calling programs, uses statistical methods to define differential enriched regions, then defines binding (histone modification) pattern information for those differential enriched regions. Our program was tested on a benchmark data: histone modifications data used by ChIPDiffs. It was then applied on two study cases: one to identify differential histone modification sites for ChIP-seq of H3K27me3 and H3K9me2 data in AKT1-transfected MCF10A cells; the other to identify differential binding sites for ChIP-seq of TCF7L2 data in MCF7 and PANC1 cells. CONCLUSIONS: Several advantages of our program include: 1) it considers a control (or input) experiment; 2) it incorporates a novel global normalization strategy: nonparametric empirical Bayes correction normalization; 3) it provides the binding pattern information among different enriched regions. QChIPat is implemented in R, Perl and C++, and has been tested under Linux. The R package is available at http://motif.bmi.ohio-state.edu/QChIPat.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4042236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40422362014-06-04 QChIPat: a quantitative method to identify distinct binding patterns for two biological ChIP-seq samples in different experimental conditions Liu, Bin Yi, Jimmy SV, Aishwarya Lan, Xun Ma, Yilin Huang, Tim HM Leone, Gustavo Jin, Victor X BMC Genomics Research BACKGROUND: Many computational programs have been developed to identify enriched regions for a single biological ChIP-seq sample. Given that many biological questions are often asked to compare the difference between two different conditions, it is important to develop new programs that address the comparison of two biological ChIP-seq samples. Despite several programs designed to address this question, these programs suffer from some drawbacks, such as inability to distinguish whether the identified differential enriched regions are indeed significantly enriched, lack of distinguishing binding patterns, and neglect of the normalization between samples. RESULTS: In this study, we developed a novel quantitative method for comparing two biological ChIP-seq samples, called QChIPat. Our method employs a new global normalization method: nonparametric empirical Bayes (NEB) correction normalization, utilizes pre-defined enriched regions identified from single-sample peak calling programs, uses statistical methods to define differential enriched regions, then defines binding (histone modification) pattern information for those differential enriched regions. Our program was tested on a benchmark data: histone modifications data used by ChIPDiffs. It was then applied on two study cases: one to identify differential histone modification sites for ChIP-seq of H3K27me3 and H3K9me2 data in AKT1-transfected MCF10A cells; the other to identify differential binding sites for ChIP-seq of TCF7L2 data in MCF7 and PANC1 cells. CONCLUSIONS: Several advantages of our program include: 1) it considers a control (or input) experiment; 2) it incorporates a novel global normalization strategy: nonparametric empirical Bayes correction normalization; 3) it provides the binding pattern information among different enriched regions. QChIPat is implemented in R, Perl and C++, and has been tested under Linux. The R package is available at http://motif.bmi.ohio-state.edu/QChIPat. BioMed Central 2013-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4042236/ /pubmed/24564479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-S8-S3 Text en Copyright © 2013 Liu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Liu, Bin
Yi, Jimmy
SV, Aishwarya
Lan, Xun
Ma, Yilin
Huang, Tim HM
Leone, Gustavo
Jin, Victor X
QChIPat: a quantitative method to identify distinct binding patterns for two biological ChIP-seq samples in different experimental conditions
title QChIPat: a quantitative method to identify distinct binding patterns for two biological ChIP-seq samples in different experimental conditions
title_full QChIPat: a quantitative method to identify distinct binding patterns for two biological ChIP-seq samples in different experimental conditions
title_fullStr QChIPat: a quantitative method to identify distinct binding patterns for two biological ChIP-seq samples in different experimental conditions
title_full_unstemmed QChIPat: a quantitative method to identify distinct binding patterns for two biological ChIP-seq samples in different experimental conditions
title_short QChIPat: a quantitative method to identify distinct binding patterns for two biological ChIP-seq samples in different experimental conditions
title_sort qchipat: a quantitative method to identify distinct binding patterns for two biological chip-seq samples in different experimental conditions
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4042236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24564479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-S8-S3
work_keys_str_mv AT liubin qchipataquantitativemethodtoidentifydistinctbindingpatternsfortwobiologicalchipseqsamplesindifferentexperimentalconditions
AT yijimmy qchipataquantitativemethodtoidentifydistinctbindingpatternsfortwobiologicalchipseqsamplesindifferentexperimentalconditions
AT svaishwarya qchipataquantitativemethodtoidentifydistinctbindingpatternsfortwobiologicalchipseqsamplesindifferentexperimentalconditions
AT lanxun qchipataquantitativemethodtoidentifydistinctbindingpatternsfortwobiologicalchipseqsamplesindifferentexperimentalconditions
AT mayilin qchipataquantitativemethodtoidentifydistinctbindingpatternsfortwobiologicalchipseqsamplesindifferentexperimentalconditions
AT huangtimhm qchipataquantitativemethodtoidentifydistinctbindingpatternsfortwobiologicalchipseqsamplesindifferentexperimentalconditions
AT leonegustavo qchipataquantitativemethodtoidentifydistinctbindingpatternsfortwobiologicalchipseqsamplesindifferentexperimentalconditions
AT jinvictorx qchipataquantitativemethodtoidentifydistinctbindingpatternsfortwobiologicalchipseqsamplesindifferentexperimentalconditions