Cargando…
Assessment of Microshear Bond Strength: Self-Etching Sealant versus Conventional Sealant
OBJECTIVE: Recently, self-etching fissure sealants have been introduced to reduce technical sensitivity; however, their efficacy should be assessed. The aim of this study was to assess of the microshear bond strength of self-etching and conventional fissure sealants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty no...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4043544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24910688 |
_version_ | 1782318926091255808 |
---|---|
author | Biria, Mina Ghasemi, Amir Torabzadeh, Hassan Shisheeian, Arash Baghban, Alireza Akbarzadeh |
author_facet | Biria, Mina Ghasemi, Amir Torabzadeh, Hassan Shisheeian, Arash Baghban, Alireza Akbarzadeh |
author_sort | Biria, Mina |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Recently, self-etching fissure sealants have been introduced to reduce technical sensitivity; however, their efficacy should be assessed. The aim of this study was to assess of the microshear bond strength of self-etching and conventional fissure sealants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty non-carious third molars were randomly divided into three groups (N=10). Microcylinders of Concise fissure sealant were bonded to prepared buccal and lingual surfaces using the two following procedures. In the first group, phosphoric acid was used to prepare the substrate; whereas in group two, Concise was used in combination with Prompt L-Pop. In group 3, a self-etching fissure sealant (Enamel Loc) was utilized per se. After 24 hours, the samples were subjected to 500 rounds of thermocycling and shear bond testing using a microtensile tester machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min. Data were analyzed using one-way repeated measure ANOVA and Bonferroni Post HOC tests (SPSS version 16). RESULTS: The mean and standard deviation of microshear bond strength of the groups were as follows: Group 1: Concise+ etching (14.59 ± 1.19 MPa), Group 2: Concise+Prompt L-Pop (12.86 ± 1.98 MPa), and Group 3: Enamel Loc (5.59 ± 0.72 MPa). One-way ANOVA revealed that all the differences were significant and the conventional sealant exhibited the highest mean bond strength. CONCLUSION: Conventional sealant using phosphoric acid etch application prior to fissure sealant application demonstrated more bond strength in comparison with that of self-etch bonding and self-etch sealant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4043544 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40435442014-06-06 Assessment of Microshear Bond Strength: Self-Etching Sealant versus Conventional Sealant Biria, Mina Ghasemi, Amir Torabzadeh, Hassan Shisheeian, Arash Baghban, Alireza Akbarzadeh J Dent (Tehran) Original Article OBJECTIVE: Recently, self-etching fissure sealants have been introduced to reduce technical sensitivity; however, their efficacy should be assessed. The aim of this study was to assess of the microshear bond strength of self-etching and conventional fissure sealants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty non-carious third molars were randomly divided into three groups (N=10). Microcylinders of Concise fissure sealant were bonded to prepared buccal and lingual surfaces using the two following procedures. In the first group, phosphoric acid was used to prepare the substrate; whereas in group two, Concise was used in combination with Prompt L-Pop. In group 3, a self-etching fissure sealant (Enamel Loc) was utilized per se. After 24 hours, the samples were subjected to 500 rounds of thermocycling and shear bond testing using a microtensile tester machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min. Data were analyzed using one-way repeated measure ANOVA and Bonferroni Post HOC tests (SPSS version 16). RESULTS: The mean and standard deviation of microshear bond strength of the groups were as follows: Group 1: Concise+ etching (14.59 ± 1.19 MPa), Group 2: Concise+Prompt L-Pop (12.86 ± 1.98 MPa), and Group 3: Enamel Loc (5.59 ± 0.72 MPa). One-way ANOVA revealed that all the differences were significant and the conventional sealant exhibited the highest mean bond strength. CONCLUSION: Conventional sealant using phosphoric acid etch application prior to fissure sealant application demonstrated more bond strength in comparison with that of self-etch bonding and self-etch sealant. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2014-03 2014-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4043544/ /pubmed/24910688 Text en Copyright © Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Biria, Mina Ghasemi, Amir Torabzadeh, Hassan Shisheeian, Arash Baghban, Alireza Akbarzadeh Assessment of Microshear Bond Strength: Self-Etching Sealant versus Conventional Sealant |
title | Assessment of Microshear Bond Strength: Self-Etching Sealant versus Conventional Sealant |
title_full | Assessment of Microshear Bond Strength: Self-Etching Sealant versus Conventional Sealant |
title_fullStr | Assessment of Microshear Bond Strength: Self-Etching Sealant versus Conventional Sealant |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of Microshear Bond Strength: Self-Etching Sealant versus Conventional Sealant |
title_short | Assessment of Microshear Bond Strength: Self-Etching Sealant versus Conventional Sealant |
title_sort | assessment of microshear bond strength: self-etching sealant versus conventional sealant |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4043544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24910688 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT biriamina assessmentofmicroshearbondstrengthselfetchingsealantversusconventionalsealant AT ghasemiamir assessmentofmicroshearbondstrengthselfetchingsealantversusconventionalsealant AT torabzadehhassan assessmentofmicroshearbondstrengthselfetchingsealantversusconventionalsealant AT shisheeianarash assessmentofmicroshearbondstrengthselfetchingsealantversusconventionalsealant AT baghbanalirezaakbarzadeh assessmentofmicroshearbondstrengthselfetchingsealantversusconventionalsealant |