Cargando…

Assessment of Microshear Bond Strength: Self-Etching Sealant versus Conventional Sealant

OBJECTIVE: Recently, self-etching fissure sealants have been introduced to reduce technical sensitivity; however, their efficacy should be assessed. The aim of this study was to assess of the microshear bond strength of self-etching and conventional fissure sealants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biria, Mina, Ghasemi, Amir, Torabzadeh, Hassan, Shisheeian, Arash, Baghban, Alireza Akbarzadeh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4043544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24910688
_version_ 1782318926091255808
author Biria, Mina
Ghasemi, Amir
Torabzadeh, Hassan
Shisheeian, Arash
Baghban, Alireza Akbarzadeh
author_facet Biria, Mina
Ghasemi, Amir
Torabzadeh, Hassan
Shisheeian, Arash
Baghban, Alireza Akbarzadeh
author_sort Biria, Mina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Recently, self-etching fissure sealants have been introduced to reduce technical sensitivity; however, their efficacy should be assessed. The aim of this study was to assess of the microshear bond strength of self-etching and conventional fissure sealants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty non-carious third molars were randomly divided into three groups (N=10). Microcylinders of Concise fissure sealant were bonded to prepared buccal and lingual surfaces using the two following procedures. In the first group, phosphoric acid was used to prepare the substrate; whereas in group two, Concise was used in combination with Prompt L-Pop. In group 3, a self-etching fissure sealant (Enamel Loc) was utilized per se. After 24 hours, the samples were subjected to 500 rounds of thermocycling and shear bond testing using a microtensile tester machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min. Data were analyzed using one-way repeated measure ANOVA and Bonferroni Post HOC tests (SPSS version 16). RESULTS: The mean and standard deviation of microshear bond strength of the groups were as follows: Group 1: Concise+ etching (14.59 ± 1.19 MPa), Group 2: Concise+Prompt L-Pop (12.86 ± 1.98 MPa), and Group 3: Enamel Loc (5.59 ± 0.72 MPa). One-way ANOVA revealed that all the differences were significant and the conventional sealant exhibited the highest mean bond strength. CONCLUSION: Conventional sealant using phosphoric acid etch application prior to fissure sealant application demonstrated more bond strength in comparison with that of self-etch bonding and self-etch sealant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4043544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40435442014-06-06 Assessment of Microshear Bond Strength: Self-Etching Sealant versus Conventional Sealant Biria, Mina Ghasemi, Amir Torabzadeh, Hassan Shisheeian, Arash Baghban, Alireza Akbarzadeh J Dent (Tehran) Original Article OBJECTIVE: Recently, self-etching fissure sealants have been introduced to reduce technical sensitivity; however, their efficacy should be assessed. The aim of this study was to assess of the microshear bond strength of self-etching and conventional fissure sealants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty non-carious third molars were randomly divided into three groups (N=10). Microcylinders of Concise fissure sealant were bonded to prepared buccal and lingual surfaces using the two following procedures. In the first group, phosphoric acid was used to prepare the substrate; whereas in group two, Concise was used in combination with Prompt L-Pop. In group 3, a self-etching fissure sealant (Enamel Loc) was utilized per se. After 24 hours, the samples were subjected to 500 rounds of thermocycling and shear bond testing using a microtensile tester machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min. Data were analyzed using one-way repeated measure ANOVA and Bonferroni Post HOC tests (SPSS version 16). RESULTS: The mean and standard deviation of microshear bond strength of the groups were as follows: Group 1: Concise+ etching (14.59 ± 1.19 MPa), Group 2: Concise+Prompt L-Pop (12.86 ± 1.98 MPa), and Group 3: Enamel Loc (5.59 ± 0.72 MPa). One-way ANOVA revealed that all the differences were significant and the conventional sealant exhibited the highest mean bond strength. CONCLUSION: Conventional sealant using phosphoric acid etch application prior to fissure sealant application demonstrated more bond strength in comparison with that of self-etch bonding and self-etch sealant. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2014-03 2014-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4043544/ /pubmed/24910688 Text en Copyright © Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Biria, Mina
Ghasemi, Amir
Torabzadeh, Hassan
Shisheeian, Arash
Baghban, Alireza Akbarzadeh
Assessment of Microshear Bond Strength: Self-Etching Sealant versus Conventional Sealant
title Assessment of Microshear Bond Strength: Self-Etching Sealant versus Conventional Sealant
title_full Assessment of Microshear Bond Strength: Self-Etching Sealant versus Conventional Sealant
title_fullStr Assessment of Microshear Bond Strength: Self-Etching Sealant versus Conventional Sealant
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Microshear Bond Strength: Self-Etching Sealant versus Conventional Sealant
title_short Assessment of Microshear Bond Strength: Self-Etching Sealant versus Conventional Sealant
title_sort assessment of microshear bond strength: self-etching sealant versus conventional sealant
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4043544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24910688
work_keys_str_mv AT biriamina assessmentofmicroshearbondstrengthselfetchingsealantversusconventionalsealant
AT ghasemiamir assessmentofmicroshearbondstrengthselfetchingsealantversusconventionalsealant
AT torabzadehhassan assessmentofmicroshearbondstrengthselfetchingsealantversusconventionalsealant
AT shisheeianarash assessmentofmicroshearbondstrengthselfetchingsealantversusconventionalsealant
AT baghbanalirezaakbarzadeh assessmentofmicroshearbondstrengthselfetchingsealantversusconventionalsealant