Cargando…

Bond Strength and Interfacial Morphology of Different Dentin Adhesives in Primary Teeth

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the interfacial morphology and the bond strength produced by the three-step, two-step and single-step bonding systems in primary teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Occlusal surfaces of 72 extracted human deciduous teeth were ground to expose the dentin. The teeth were divided into...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vashisth, Pallavi, Mittal, Mudit, Goswami, Mousumi, Chaudhary, Seema, Dwivedi, Swati
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4043550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24910694
_version_ 1782318927452307456
author Vashisth, Pallavi
Mittal, Mudit
Goswami, Mousumi
Chaudhary, Seema
Dwivedi, Swati
author_facet Vashisth, Pallavi
Mittal, Mudit
Goswami, Mousumi
Chaudhary, Seema
Dwivedi, Swati
author_sort Vashisth, Pallavi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the interfacial morphology and the bond strength produced by the three-step, two-step and single-step bonding systems in primary teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Occlusal surfaces of 72 extracted human deciduous teeth were ground to expose the dentin. The teeth were divided into four groups: (a) Scotchbond Multipurpose (3M, ESPE), (b) Adh Se (Vivadent), (d) OptiBond All-in-One (Kerr) and (e)Futurabond NR (VOCO, Cuxhaven, Germany). The adhesives were applied to each group following the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, teeth from each group were divided into two groups: (A) For viewing interfacial morphology (32 teeth), with 8 teeth in each group, and (B) For measurement of bond strength (40 teeth), with 10 teeth in each group. All the samples were prepared for viewing under SEM. The statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 15.0 software. RESULTS: Observational measurement of tag length in different adhesives revealed that Scotchbond had the most widely spread values with a range from 12.20 to 89.10μm while OptiBond AIO had the narrowest range (0 to 22.50). The bond strength of Scotchbond Multipurpose was significantly higher (7.4744±1.88763) (p<0.001) as compared to Futurabond NR (3.8070±1.61345), Adhe SE (4.4478 ± 1.3820) and OptiBond-all-in-one (4.4856±1.07925). CONCLUSION: The three-step bonding system showed better results as compared to simplified studied bonding systems
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4043550
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40435502014-06-06 Bond Strength and Interfacial Morphology of Different Dentin Adhesives in Primary Teeth Vashisth, Pallavi Mittal, Mudit Goswami, Mousumi Chaudhary, Seema Dwivedi, Swati J Dent (Tehran) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the interfacial morphology and the bond strength produced by the three-step, two-step and single-step bonding systems in primary teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Occlusal surfaces of 72 extracted human deciduous teeth were ground to expose the dentin. The teeth were divided into four groups: (a) Scotchbond Multipurpose (3M, ESPE), (b) Adh Se (Vivadent), (d) OptiBond All-in-One (Kerr) and (e)Futurabond NR (VOCO, Cuxhaven, Germany). The adhesives were applied to each group following the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, teeth from each group were divided into two groups: (A) For viewing interfacial morphology (32 teeth), with 8 teeth in each group, and (B) For measurement of bond strength (40 teeth), with 10 teeth in each group. All the samples were prepared for viewing under SEM. The statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 15.0 software. RESULTS: Observational measurement of tag length in different adhesives revealed that Scotchbond had the most widely spread values with a range from 12.20 to 89.10μm while OptiBond AIO had the narrowest range (0 to 22.50). The bond strength of Scotchbond Multipurpose was significantly higher (7.4744±1.88763) (p<0.001) as compared to Futurabond NR (3.8070±1.61345), Adhe SE (4.4478 ± 1.3820) and OptiBond-all-in-one (4.4856±1.07925). CONCLUSION: The three-step bonding system showed better results as compared to simplified studied bonding systems Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2014-03 2014-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4043550/ /pubmed/24910694 Text en Copyright © Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Vashisth, Pallavi
Mittal, Mudit
Goswami, Mousumi
Chaudhary, Seema
Dwivedi, Swati
Bond Strength and Interfacial Morphology of Different Dentin Adhesives in Primary Teeth
title Bond Strength and Interfacial Morphology of Different Dentin Adhesives in Primary Teeth
title_full Bond Strength and Interfacial Morphology of Different Dentin Adhesives in Primary Teeth
title_fullStr Bond Strength and Interfacial Morphology of Different Dentin Adhesives in Primary Teeth
title_full_unstemmed Bond Strength and Interfacial Morphology of Different Dentin Adhesives in Primary Teeth
title_short Bond Strength and Interfacial Morphology of Different Dentin Adhesives in Primary Teeth
title_sort bond strength and interfacial morphology of different dentin adhesives in primary teeth
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4043550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24910694
work_keys_str_mv AT vashisthpallavi bondstrengthandinterfacialmorphologyofdifferentdentinadhesivesinprimaryteeth
AT mittalmudit bondstrengthandinterfacialmorphologyofdifferentdentinadhesivesinprimaryteeth
AT goswamimousumi bondstrengthandinterfacialmorphologyofdifferentdentinadhesivesinprimaryteeth
AT chaudharyseema bondstrengthandinterfacialmorphologyofdifferentdentinadhesivesinprimaryteeth
AT dwivediswati bondstrengthandinterfacialmorphologyofdifferentdentinadhesivesinprimaryteeth