Cargando…
Bond Strength and Interfacial Morphology of Different Dentin Adhesives in Primary Teeth
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the interfacial morphology and the bond strength produced by the three-step, two-step and single-step bonding systems in primary teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Occlusal surfaces of 72 extracted human deciduous teeth were ground to expose the dentin. The teeth were divided into...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4043550/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24910694 |
_version_ | 1782318927452307456 |
---|---|
author | Vashisth, Pallavi Mittal, Mudit Goswami, Mousumi Chaudhary, Seema Dwivedi, Swati |
author_facet | Vashisth, Pallavi Mittal, Mudit Goswami, Mousumi Chaudhary, Seema Dwivedi, Swati |
author_sort | Vashisth, Pallavi |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the interfacial morphology and the bond strength produced by the three-step, two-step and single-step bonding systems in primary teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Occlusal surfaces of 72 extracted human deciduous teeth were ground to expose the dentin. The teeth were divided into four groups: (a) Scotchbond Multipurpose (3M, ESPE), (b) Adh Se (Vivadent), (d) OptiBond All-in-One (Kerr) and (e)Futurabond NR (VOCO, Cuxhaven, Germany). The adhesives were applied to each group following the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, teeth from each group were divided into two groups: (A) For viewing interfacial morphology (32 teeth), with 8 teeth in each group, and (B) For measurement of bond strength (40 teeth), with 10 teeth in each group. All the samples were prepared for viewing under SEM. The statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 15.0 software. RESULTS: Observational measurement of tag length in different adhesives revealed that Scotchbond had the most widely spread values with a range from 12.20 to 89.10μm while OptiBond AIO had the narrowest range (0 to 22.50). The bond strength of Scotchbond Multipurpose was significantly higher (7.4744±1.88763) (p<0.001) as compared to Futurabond NR (3.8070±1.61345), Adhe SE (4.4478 ± 1.3820) and OptiBond-all-in-one (4.4856±1.07925). CONCLUSION: The three-step bonding system showed better results as compared to simplified studied bonding systems |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4043550 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40435502014-06-06 Bond Strength and Interfacial Morphology of Different Dentin Adhesives in Primary Teeth Vashisth, Pallavi Mittal, Mudit Goswami, Mousumi Chaudhary, Seema Dwivedi, Swati J Dent (Tehran) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the interfacial morphology and the bond strength produced by the three-step, two-step and single-step bonding systems in primary teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Occlusal surfaces of 72 extracted human deciduous teeth were ground to expose the dentin. The teeth were divided into four groups: (a) Scotchbond Multipurpose (3M, ESPE), (b) Adh Se (Vivadent), (d) OptiBond All-in-One (Kerr) and (e)Futurabond NR (VOCO, Cuxhaven, Germany). The adhesives were applied to each group following the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, teeth from each group were divided into two groups: (A) For viewing interfacial morphology (32 teeth), with 8 teeth in each group, and (B) For measurement of bond strength (40 teeth), with 10 teeth in each group. All the samples were prepared for viewing under SEM. The statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 15.0 software. RESULTS: Observational measurement of tag length in different adhesives revealed that Scotchbond had the most widely spread values with a range from 12.20 to 89.10μm while OptiBond AIO had the narrowest range (0 to 22.50). The bond strength of Scotchbond Multipurpose was significantly higher (7.4744±1.88763) (p<0.001) as compared to Futurabond NR (3.8070±1.61345), Adhe SE (4.4478 ± 1.3820) and OptiBond-all-in-one (4.4856±1.07925). CONCLUSION: The three-step bonding system showed better results as compared to simplified studied bonding systems Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2014-03 2014-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4043550/ /pubmed/24910694 Text en Copyright © Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Vashisth, Pallavi Mittal, Mudit Goswami, Mousumi Chaudhary, Seema Dwivedi, Swati Bond Strength and Interfacial Morphology of Different Dentin Adhesives in Primary Teeth |
title | Bond Strength and Interfacial Morphology of Different Dentin Adhesives in Primary Teeth |
title_full | Bond Strength and Interfacial Morphology of Different Dentin Adhesives in Primary Teeth |
title_fullStr | Bond Strength and Interfacial Morphology of Different Dentin Adhesives in Primary Teeth |
title_full_unstemmed | Bond Strength and Interfacial Morphology of Different Dentin Adhesives in Primary Teeth |
title_short | Bond Strength and Interfacial Morphology of Different Dentin Adhesives in Primary Teeth |
title_sort | bond strength and interfacial morphology of different dentin adhesives in primary teeth |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4043550/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24910694 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vashisthpallavi bondstrengthandinterfacialmorphologyofdifferentdentinadhesivesinprimaryteeth AT mittalmudit bondstrengthandinterfacialmorphologyofdifferentdentinadhesivesinprimaryteeth AT goswamimousumi bondstrengthandinterfacialmorphologyofdifferentdentinadhesivesinprimaryteeth AT chaudharyseema bondstrengthandinterfacialmorphologyofdifferentdentinadhesivesinprimaryteeth AT dwivediswati bondstrengthandinterfacialmorphologyofdifferentdentinadhesivesinprimaryteeth |