Cargando…

The Attitudes to Ageing Questionnaire: Mokken Scaling Analysis

BACKGROUND: Hierarchical scales are useful in understanding the structure of underlying latent traits in many questionnaires. The Attitudes to Ageing Questionnaire (AAQ) explored the attitudes to ageing of older people themselves, and originally described three distinct subscales: (1) Psychosocial L...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shenkin, Susan D., Watson, Roger, Laidlaw, Ken, Starr, John M., Deary, Ian J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4043998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24892302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099100
_version_ 1782319048907816960
author Shenkin, Susan D.
Watson, Roger
Laidlaw, Ken
Starr, John M.
Deary, Ian J.
author_facet Shenkin, Susan D.
Watson, Roger
Laidlaw, Ken
Starr, John M.
Deary, Ian J.
author_sort Shenkin, Susan D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hierarchical scales are useful in understanding the structure of underlying latent traits in many questionnaires. The Attitudes to Ageing Questionnaire (AAQ) explored the attitudes to ageing of older people themselves, and originally described three distinct subscales: (1) Psychosocial Loss (2) Physical Change and (3) Psychological Growth. This study aimed to use Mokken analysis, a method of Item Response Theory, to test for hierarchies within the AAQ and to explore how these relate to underlying latent traits. METHODS: Participants in a longitudinal cohort study, the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936, completed a cross-sectional postal survey. Data from 802 participants were analysed using Mokken Scaling analysis. These results were compared with factor analysis using exploratory structural equation modelling. RESULTS: Participants were 51.6% male, mean age 74.0 years (SD 0.28). Three scales were identified from 18 of the 24 items: two weak Mokken scales and one moderate Mokken scale. (1) ‘Vitality’ contained a combination of items from all three previously determined factors of the AAQ, with a hierarchy from physical to psychosocial; (2) ‘Legacy’ contained items exclusively from the Psychological Growth scale, with a hierarchy from individual contributions to passing things on; (3) ‘Exclusion’ contained items from the Psychosocial Loss scale, with a hierarchy from general to specific instances. All of the scales were reliable and statistically significant with ‘Legacy’ showing invariant item ordering. The scales correlate as expected with personality, anxiety and depression. Exploratory SEM mostly confirmed the original factor structure. CONCLUSIONS: The concurrent use of factor analysis and Mokken scaling provides additional information about the AAQ. The previously-described factor structure is mostly confirmed. Mokken scaling identifies a new factor relating to vitality, and a hierarchy of responses within three separate scales, referring to vitality, legacy and exclusion. This shows what older people themselves consider important regarding their own ageing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4043998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40439982014-06-09 The Attitudes to Ageing Questionnaire: Mokken Scaling Analysis Shenkin, Susan D. Watson, Roger Laidlaw, Ken Starr, John M. Deary, Ian J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Hierarchical scales are useful in understanding the structure of underlying latent traits in many questionnaires. The Attitudes to Ageing Questionnaire (AAQ) explored the attitudes to ageing of older people themselves, and originally described three distinct subscales: (1) Psychosocial Loss (2) Physical Change and (3) Psychological Growth. This study aimed to use Mokken analysis, a method of Item Response Theory, to test for hierarchies within the AAQ and to explore how these relate to underlying latent traits. METHODS: Participants in a longitudinal cohort study, the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936, completed a cross-sectional postal survey. Data from 802 participants were analysed using Mokken Scaling analysis. These results were compared with factor analysis using exploratory structural equation modelling. RESULTS: Participants were 51.6% male, mean age 74.0 years (SD 0.28). Three scales were identified from 18 of the 24 items: two weak Mokken scales and one moderate Mokken scale. (1) ‘Vitality’ contained a combination of items from all three previously determined factors of the AAQ, with a hierarchy from physical to psychosocial; (2) ‘Legacy’ contained items exclusively from the Psychological Growth scale, with a hierarchy from individual contributions to passing things on; (3) ‘Exclusion’ contained items from the Psychosocial Loss scale, with a hierarchy from general to specific instances. All of the scales were reliable and statistically significant with ‘Legacy’ showing invariant item ordering. The scales correlate as expected with personality, anxiety and depression. Exploratory SEM mostly confirmed the original factor structure. CONCLUSIONS: The concurrent use of factor analysis and Mokken scaling provides additional information about the AAQ. The previously-described factor structure is mostly confirmed. Mokken scaling identifies a new factor relating to vitality, and a hierarchy of responses within three separate scales, referring to vitality, legacy and exclusion. This shows what older people themselves consider important regarding their own ageing. Public Library of Science 2014-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4043998/ /pubmed/24892302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099100 Text en © 2014 Shenkin et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shenkin, Susan D.
Watson, Roger
Laidlaw, Ken
Starr, John M.
Deary, Ian J.
The Attitudes to Ageing Questionnaire: Mokken Scaling Analysis
title The Attitudes to Ageing Questionnaire: Mokken Scaling Analysis
title_full The Attitudes to Ageing Questionnaire: Mokken Scaling Analysis
title_fullStr The Attitudes to Ageing Questionnaire: Mokken Scaling Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Attitudes to Ageing Questionnaire: Mokken Scaling Analysis
title_short The Attitudes to Ageing Questionnaire: Mokken Scaling Analysis
title_sort attitudes to ageing questionnaire: mokken scaling analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4043998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24892302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099100
work_keys_str_mv AT shenkinsusand theattitudestoageingquestionnairemokkenscalinganalysis
AT watsonroger theattitudestoageingquestionnairemokkenscalinganalysis
AT laidlawken theattitudestoageingquestionnairemokkenscalinganalysis
AT starrjohnm theattitudestoageingquestionnairemokkenscalinganalysis
AT dearyianj theattitudestoageingquestionnairemokkenscalinganalysis
AT shenkinsusand attitudestoageingquestionnairemokkenscalinganalysis
AT watsonroger attitudestoageingquestionnairemokkenscalinganalysis
AT laidlawken attitudestoageingquestionnairemokkenscalinganalysis
AT starrjohnm attitudestoageingquestionnairemokkenscalinganalysis
AT dearyianj attitudestoageingquestionnairemokkenscalinganalysis