Cargando…
Breast Density Assessment Using a 3T MRI System: Comparison among Different Sequences
PURPOSE: To compare MRI sequences for breast density measurements on a 3T MRI system using IDEAL (Iterative Decomposition of water and fat with Echo Asymmetry and Least squares estimation) as possible physiology-like reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI examination was performed in 48 consecutive p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4044003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24892933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099027 |
_version_ | 1782319049793863680 |
---|---|
author | Tagliafico, Alberto Bignotti, Bianca Tagliafico, Giulio Astengo, Davide Martino, Lucia Airaldi, Sonia Signori, Alessio Sormani, Maria Pia Houssami, Nehmat Calabrese, Massimo |
author_facet | Tagliafico, Alberto Bignotti, Bianca Tagliafico, Giulio Astengo, Davide Martino, Lucia Airaldi, Sonia Signori, Alessio Sormani, Maria Pia Houssami, Nehmat Calabrese, Massimo |
author_sort | Tagliafico, Alberto |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare MRI sequences for breast density measurements on a 3T MRI system using IDEAL (Iterative Decomposition of water and fat with Echo Asymmetry and Least squares estimation) as possible physiology-like reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI examination was performed in 48 consecutive patients (mean age 41, years; range, 35–67 years) on a 3.0T scanner and 46 were included. All (fertile) women, were examined between days 5 and 15 of their menstrual cycle. MRI protocol included: T1-turbo spin-echo (T1-tSE), T2-turbo spin-echo (T2-tSE), VIBRANT (Volume Imaging for Breast Assessment) before and after injection of contrast media and IDEAL. Breast density was calculated with semi-automated software. Statistical analysis was performed with non-parametric tests. RESULTS: Mean percentage of breast density calculated in each sequence was: T1-tSE = 56%; T2-tSE = 52%; IDEAL FatOnly = 55%; IDEAL WaterOnly = 53%, VIBRANT = 55%. Significant differences were observed between T2-tSE and both T1-tSE (p<0.001), VIBRANT sequences (p = 0.009), T1-tSE and both IDEAL WaterOnly (p = 0.007) and IDEAL FatOnly (p = 0.047). Breast density percentage showed a positive linear correlation among different sequences: r≥0.93. CONCLUSIONS: Differences exist between MRI sequences used to assess breast density percentage. T1-weighted sequences values were similar to IDEAL sequences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4044003 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40440032014-06-09 Breast Density Assessment Using a 3T MRI System: Comparison among Different Sequences Tagliafico, Alberto Bignotti, Bianca Tagliafico, Giulio Astengo, Davide Martino, Lucia Airaldi, Sonia Signori, Alessio Sormani, Maria Pia Houssami, Nehmat Calabrese, Massimo PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To compare MRI sequences for breast density measurements on a 3T MRI system using IDEAL (Iterative Decomposition of water and fat with Echo Asymmetry and Least squares estimation) as possible physiology-like reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI examination was performed in 48 consecutive patients (mean age 41, years; range, 35–67 years) on a 3.0T scanner and 46 were included. All (fertile) women, were examined between days 5 and 15 of their menstrual cycle. MRI protocol included: T1-turbo spin-echo (T1-tSE), T2-turbo spin-echo (T2-tSE), VIBRANT (Volume Imaging for Breast Assessment) before and after injection of contrast media and IDEAL. Breast density was calculated with semi-automated software. Statistical analysis was performed with non-parametric tests. RESULTS: Mean percentage of breast density calculated in each sequence was: T1-tSE = 56%; T2-tSE = 52%; IDEAL FatOnly = 55%; IDEAL WaterOnly = 53%, VIBRANT = 55%. Significant differences were observed between T2-tSE and both T1-tSE (p<0.001), VIBRANT sequences (p = 0.009), T1-tSE and both IDEAL WaterOnly (p = 0.007) and IDEAL FatOnly (p = 0.047). Breast density percentage showed a positive linear correlation among different sequences: r≥0.93. CONCLUSIONS: Differences exist between MRI sequences used to assess breast density percentage. T1-weighted sequences values were similar to IDEAL sequences. Public Library of Science 2014-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4044003/ /pubmed/24892933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099027 Text en © 2014 Tagliafico et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tagliafico, Alberto Bignotti, Bianca Tagliafico, Giulio Astengo, Davide Martino, Lucia Airaldi, Sonia Signori, Alessio Sormani, Maria Pia Houssami, Nehmat Calabrese, Massimo Breast Density Assessment Using a 3T MRI System: Comparison among Different Sequences |
title | Breast Density Assessment Using a 3T MRI System: Comparison among Different Sequences |
title_full | Breast Density Assessment Using a 3T MRI System: Comparison among Different Sequences |
title_fullStr | Breast Density Assessment Using a 3T MRI System: Comparison among Different Sequences |
title_full_unstemmed | Breast Density Assessment Using a 3T MRI System: Comparison among Different Sequences |
title_short | Breast Density Assessment Using a 3T MRI System: Comparison among Different Sequences |
title_sort | breast density assessment using a 3t mri system: comparison among different sequences |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4044003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24892933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tagliaficoalberto breastdensityassessmentusinga3tmrisystemcomparisonamongdifferentsequences AT bignottibianca breastdensityassessmentusinga3tmrisystemcomparisonamongdifferentsequences AT tagliaficogiulio breastdensityassessmentusinga3tmrisystemcomparisonamongdifferentsequences AT astengodavide breastdensityassessmentusinga3tmrisystemcomparisonamongdifferentsequences AT martinolucia breastdensityassessmentusinga3tmrisystemcomparisonamongdifferentsequences AT airaldisonia breastdensityassessmentusinga3tmrisystemcomparisonamongdifferentsequences AT signorialessio breastdensityassessmentusinga3tmrisystemcomparisonamongdifferentsequences AT sormanimariapia breastdensityassessmentusinga3tmrisystemcomparisonamongdifferentsequences AT houssaminehmat breastdensityassessmentusinga3tmrisystemcomparisonamongdifferentsequences AT calabresemassimo breastdensityassessmentusinga3tmrisystemcomparisonamongdifferentsequences |