Cargando…

Breast Density Assessment Using a 3T MRI System: Comparison among Different Sequences

PURPOSE: To compare MRI sequences for breast density measurements on a 3T MRI system using IDEAL (Iterative Decomposition of water and fat with Echo Asymmetry and Least squares estimation) as possible physiology-like reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI examination was performed in 48 consecutive p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tagliafico, Alberto, Bignotti, Bianca, Tagliafico, Giulio, Astengo, Davide, Martino, Lucia, Airaldi, Sonia, Signori, Alessio, Sormani, Maria Pia, Houssami, Nehmat, Calabrese, Massimo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4044003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24892933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099027
_version_ 1782319049793863680
author Tagliafico, Alberto
Bignotti, Bianca
Tagliafico, Giulio
Astengo, Davide
Martino, Lucia
Airaldi, Sonia
Signori, Alessio
Sormani, Maria Pia
Houssami, Nehmat
Calabrese, Massimo
author_facet Tagliafico, Alberto
Bignotti, Bianca
Tagliafico, Giulio
Astengo, Davide
Martino, Lucia
Airaldi, Sonia
Signori, Alessio
Sormani, Maria Pia
Houssami, Nehmat
Calabrese, Massimo
author_sort Tagliafico, Alberto
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare MRI sequences for breast density measurements on a 3T MRI system using IDEAL (Iterative Decomposition of water and fat with Echo Asymmetry and Least squares estimation) as possible physiology-like reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI examination was performed in 48 consecutive patients (mean age 41, years; range, 35–67 years) on a 3.0T scanner and 46 were included. All (fertile) women, were examined between days 5 and 15 of their menstrual cycle. MRI protocol included: T1-turbo spin-echo (T1-tSE), T2-turbo spin-echo (T2-tSE), VIBRANT (Volume Imaging for Breast Assessment) before and after injection of contrast media and IDEAL. Breast density was calculated with semi-automated software. Statistical analysis was performed with non-parametric tests. RESULTS: Mean percentage of breast density calculated in each sequence was: T1-tSE  = 56%; T2-tSE  = 52%; IDEAL FatOnly  = 55%; IDEAL WaterOnly  = 53%, VIBRANT  = 55%. Significant differences were observed between T2-tSE and both T1-tSE (p<0.001), VIBRANT sequences (p = 0.009), T1-tSE and both IDEAL WaterOnly (p = 0.007) and IDEAL FatOnly (p = 0.047). Breast density percentage showed a positive linear correlation among different sequences: r≥0.93. CONCLUSIONS: Differences exist between MRI sequences used to assess breast density percentage. T1-weighted sequences values were similar to IDEAL sequences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4044003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40440032014-06-09 Breast Density Assessment Using a 3T MRI System: Comparison among Different Sequences Tagliafico, Alberto Bignotti, Bianca Tagliafico, Giulio Astengo, Davide Martino, Lucia Airaldi, Sonia Signori, Alessio Sormani, Maria Pia Houssami, Nehmat Calabrese, Massimo PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To compare MRI sequences for breast density measurements on a 3T MRI system using IDEAL (Iterative Decomposition of water and fat with Echo Asymmetry and Least squares estimation) as possible physiology-like reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI examination was performed in 48 consecutive patients (mean age 41, years; range, 35–67 years) on a 3.0T scanner and 46 were included. All (fertile) women, were examined between days 5 and 15 of their menstrual cycle. MRI protocol included: T1-turbo spin-echo (T1-tSE), T2-turbo spin-echo (T2-tSE), VIBRANT (Volume Imaging for Breast Assessment) before and after injection of contrast media and IDEAL. Breast density was calculated with semi-automated software. Statistical analysis was performed with non-parametric tests. RESULTS: Mean percentage of breast density calculated in each sequence was: T1-tSE  = 56%; T2-tSE  = 52%; IDEAL FatOnly  = 55%; IDEAL WaterOnly  = 53%, VIBRANT  = 55%. Significant differences were observed between T2-tSE and both T1-tSE (p<0.001), VIBRANT sequences (p = 0.009), T1-tSE and both IDEAL WaterOnly (p = 0.007) and IDEAL FatOnly (p = 0.047). Breast density percentage showed a positive linear correlation among different sequences: r≥0.93. CONCLUSIONS: Differences exist between MRI sequences used to assess breast density percentage. T1-weighted sequences values were similar to IDEAL sequences. Public Library of Science 2014-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4044003/ /pubmed/24892933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099027 Text en © 2014 Tagliafico et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tagliafico, Alberto
Bignotti, Bianca
Tagliafico, Giulio
Astengo, Davide
Martino, Lucia
Airaldi, Sonia
Signori, Alessio
Sormani, Maria Pia
Houssami, Nehmat
Calabrese, Massimo
Breast Density Assessment Using a 3T MRI System: Comparison among Different Sequences
title Breast Density Assessment Using a 3T MRI System: Comparison among Different Sequences
title_full Breast Density Assessment Using a 3T MRI System: Comparison among Different Sequences
title_fullStr Breast Density Assessment Using a 3T MRI System: Comparison among Different Sequences
title_full_unstemmed Breast Density Assessment Using a 3T MRI System: Comparison among Different Sequences
title_short Breast Density Assessment Using a 3T MRI System: Comparison among Different Sequences
title_sort breast density assessment using a 3t mri system: comparison among different sequences
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4044003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24892933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099027
work_keys_str_mv AT tagliaficoalberto breastdensityassessmentusinga3tmrisystemcomparisonamongdifferentsequences
AT bignottibianca breastdensityassessmentusinga3tmrisystemcomparisonamongdifferentsequences
AT tagliaficogiulio breastdensityassessmentusinga3tmrisystemcomparisonamongdifferentsequences
AT astengodavide breastdensityassessmentusinga3tmrisystemcomparisonamongdifferentsequences
AT martinolucia breastdensityassessmentusinga3tmrisystemcomparisonamongdifferentsequences
AT airaldisonia breastdensityassessmentusinga3tmrisystemcomparisonamongdifferentsequences
AT signorialessio breastdensityassessmentusinga3tmrisystemcomparisonamongdifferentsequences
AT sormanimariapia breastdensityassessmentusinga3tmrisystemcomparisonamongdifferentsequences
AT houssaminehmat breastdensityassessmentusinga3tmrisystemcomparisonamongdifferentsequences
AT calabresemassimo breastdensityassessmentusinga3tmrisystemcomparisonamongdifferentsequences