Cargando…
Cytometric fingerprints: evaluation of new tools for analyzing microbial community dynamics
Optical characteristics of individual bacterial cells of natural communities can be measured with flow cytometry (FCM) in high throughput. The resulting data are visualized in cytometric histograms. These histograms represent individual cytometric fingerprints of microbial communities, e.g., at cert...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4044693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24926290 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00273 |
_version_ | 1782319192796561408 |
---|---|
author | Koch, Christin Harnisch, Falk Schröder, Uwe Müller, Susann |
author_facet | Koch, Christin Harnisch, Falk Schröder, Uwe Müller, Susann |
author_sort | Koch, Christin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Optical characteristics of individual bacterial cells of natural communities can be measured with flow cytometry (FCM) in high throughput. The resulting data are visualized in cytometric histograms. These histograms represent individual cytometric fingerprints of microbial communities, e.g., at certain time points or microenvironmental conditions. Up to now four tools for analyzing the variation in these cytometric fingerprints are available but have not yet been systematically compared regarding application: Dalmatian Plot, Cytometric Histogram Image Comparison (CHIC), Cytometric Barcoding (CyBar), and FlowFP. In this article these tools were evaluated concerning (i) the required experience of the operator in handling cytometric data sets, (ii) the detection level of changes, (iii) time demand for analysis, and (iv) software requirements. As an illustrative example, FCM was used to characterize the microbial community structure of electroactive microbial biofilms. Their cytometric fingerprints were determined, analyzed with all four tools, and correlated to experimental and functional parameters. The source of inoculum (four different types of wastewater samples) showed the strongest influence on the microbial community structure and biofilm performance while the choice of substrate (acetate or lactate) had no significant effect in the present study. All four evaluation tools were found suitable to monitor structural changes of natural microbial communities. The Dalmatian Plot was shown to be most sensitive to operator impact but nevertheless provided an overview on community shifts. CHIC, CyBar, and FlowFP showed less operator dependence and gave highly resolved information on community structure variation on different detection levels. In conclusion, experimental and productivity parameters correlated with the biofilm structures and practical process integration details were available from cytometric fingerprint analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4044693 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40446932014-06-12 Cytometric fingerprints: evaluation of new tools for analyzing microbial community dynamics Koch, Christin Harnisch, Falk Schröder, Uwe Müller, Susann Front Microbiol Microbiology Optical characteristics of individual bacterial cells of natural communities can be measured with flow cytometry (FCM) in high throughput. The resulting data are visualized in cytometric histograms. These histograms represent individual cytometric fingerprints of microbial communities, e.g., at certain time points or microenvironmental conditions. Up to now four tools for analyzing the variation in these cytometric fingerprints are available but have not yet been systematically compared regarding application: Dalmatian Plot, Cytometric Histogram Image Comparison (CHIC), Cytometric Barcoding (CyBar), and FlowFP. In this article these tools were evaluated concerning (i) the required experience of the operator in handling cytometric data sets, (ii) the detection level of changes, (iii) time demand for analysis, and (iv) software requirements. As an illustrative example, FCM was used to characterize the microbial community structure of electroactive microbial biofilms. Their cytometric fingerprints were determined, analyzed with all four tools, and correlated to experimental and functional parameters. The source of inoculum (four different types of wastewater samples) showed the strongest influence on the microbial community structure and biofilm performance while the choice of substrate (acetate or lactate) had no significant effect in the present study. All four evaluation tools were found suitable to monitor structural changes of natural microbial communities. The Dalmatian Plot was shown to be most sensitive to operator impact but nevertheless provided an overview on community shifts. CHIC, CyBar, and FlowFP showed less operator dependence and gave highly resolved information on community structure variation on different detection levels. In conclusion, experimental and productivity parameters correlated with the biofilm structures and practical process integration details were available from cytometric fingerprint analysis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4044693/ /pubmed/24926290 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00273 Text en Copyright © 2014 Koch, Harnisch, Schröder and Müller. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology Koch, Christin Harnisch, Falk Schröder, Uwe Müller, Susann Cytometric fingerprints: evaluation of new tools for analyzing microbial community dynamics |
title | Cytometric fingerprints: evaluation of new tools for analyzing microbial community dynamics |
title_full | Cytometric fingerprints: evaluation of new tools for analyzing microbial community dynamics |
title_fullStr | Cytometric fingerprints: evaluation of new tools for analyzing microbial community dynamics |
title_full_unstemmed | Cytometric fingerprints: evaluation of new tools for analyzing microbial community dynamics |
title_short | Cytometric fingerprints: evaluation of new tools for analyzing microbial community dynamics |
title_sort | cytometric fingerprints: evaluation of new tools for analyzing microbial community dynamics |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4044693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24926290 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00273 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kochchristin cytometricfingerprintsevaluationofnewtoolsforanalyzingmicrobialcommunitydynamics AT harnischfalk cytometricfingerprintsevaluationofnewtoolsforanalyzingmicrobialcommunitydynamics AT schroderuwe cytometricfingerprintsevaluationofnewtoolsforanalyzingmicrobialcommunitydynamics AT mullersusann cytometricfingerprintsevaluationofnewtoolsforanalyzingmicrobialcommunitydynamics |