Cargando…

Benefits and harms in clinical trials of duloxetine for treatment of major depressive disorder: comparison of clinical study reports, trial registries, and publications

Objective To determine, using research on duloxetine for major depressive disorder as an example, if there are inconsistencies between protocols, clinical study reports, and main publicly available sources (journal articles and trial registries), and within clinical study reports themselves, with re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Maund, Emma, Tendal, Britta, Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn, Jørgensen, Karsten Juhl, Lundh, Andreas, Schroll, Jeppe, Gøtzsche, Peter C
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2014
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4045316/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24899650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3510

Ejemplares similares

Coding of adverse events of suicidality in clinical study reports of duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder: descriptive study
por: Maund, Emma, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Challenges in Coding Adverse Events in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review
por: Schroll, Jeppe Bennekou, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Divine intervention? A Cochrane review on intercessory prayer gone beyond science and reason
por: Jørgensen, Karsten Juhl, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Conflicts of Interest at Medical Journals: The Influence of Industry-Supported Randomised Trials on Journal Impact Factors and Revenue – Cohort Study
por: Lundh, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Correction: Conflicts of Interest at Medical Journals: The Influence of Industry-Supported Randomised Trials on Journal Impact Factors and Revenue – Cohort Study
por: Lundh, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Spontaneous improvement in randomised clinical trials: meta-analysis of three-armed trials comparing no treatment, placebo and active intervention
por: Krogsbøll, Lasse Theis, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Are benefits and harms in mammography screening given equal attention in scientific articles? A cross-sectional study
por: Jørgensen, Karsten Juhl, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Acupuncture treatment for pain: systematic review of randomised clinical trials with acupuncture, placebo acupuncture, and no acupuncture groups
por: Madsen, Matias Vested, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols
por: Chan, An-Wen, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Underreporting of conflicts of interest in clinical practice guidelines: cross sectional study
por: Bindslev, Julie Bolette Brix, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

EMA’s mishandling of an investigation into suspected serious neurological harms of HPV vaccines
por: Gøtzsche, Peter C, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Benefits and harms of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines: comparison of trial data from clinical study reports with corresponding trial register entries and journal publications
por: Jørgensen, Lars, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Benefits and harms of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines: systematic review with meta-analyses of trial data from clinical study reports
por: Jørgensen, Lars, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Assessment of Adverse Events in Protocols, Clinical Study Reports, and Published Papers of Trials of Orlistat: A Document Analysis
por: Schroll, Jeppe Bennekou, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Association between conflicts of interest and favourable recommendations in clinical guidelines, advisory committee reports, opinion pieces, and narrative reviews: systematic review
por: Nejstgaard, Camilla H, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Disagreements in meta-analyses using outcomes measured on continuous or rating scales: observer agreement study
por: Tendal, Britta, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Promoting public access to clinical trial protocols: challenges and recommendations
por: Chan, An-Wen, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Pain relief that matters to patients: systematic review of empirical studies assessing the minimum clinically important difference in acute pain
por: Olsen, Mette Frahm, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Locking plate osteosynthesis in displaced 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus: A systematic review of benefits and harms
por: Brorson, Stig, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Ghost Authorship in Industry-Initiated Randomised Trials
por: Gøtzsche, Peter C, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Influence and management of conflicts of interest in randomised clinical trials: qualitative interview study
por: Østengaard, Lasse, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Suspicions of possible vaccine harms must be scrutinised openly and independently to ensure confidence
por: Juhl Jørgensen, Karsten, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Multiplicity of data in trial reports and the reliability of meta-analyses: empirical study
por: Tendal, Britta, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Mechanisms and direction of allocation bias in randomised clinical trials
por: Paludan-Müller, Asger, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Randomized clinical trials with run-in periods: frequency, characteristics and reporting
por: Laursen, David Ruben Teindl, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Do protocols for new randomised trials take previous similar trials into account? Cohort study of contemporary trial protocols
por: Paludan-Müller, Asger Sand, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The matching quality of experimental and control interventions in blinded pharmacological randomised clinical trials: a methodological systematic review
por: Bello, Segun, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
por: Chan, An-Wen, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Overdiagnosis in publicly organised mammography screening programmes: systematic review of incidence trends
por: Jørgensen, Karsten Juhl, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Effect of mammography screening on surgical treatment for breast cancer in Norway: comparative analysis of cancer registry data
por: Suhrke, Pål, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Industry-supported meta-analyses compared with meta-analyses with non-profit or no support: Differences in methodological quality and conclusions
por: Jørgensen, Anders W, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Inconsistent reporting of surrogate outcomes in randomised clinical trials: cohort study
por: la Cour, Jeppe Lerche, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study
por: Schroll, Jeppe B, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Searching for unpublished data for Cochrane reviews: cross sectional study
por: Schroll, Jeppe Bennekou, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Conflict of Interest Policies at Medical Schools and Teaching Hospitals: A Systematic Review of Cross-sectional Studies
por: Fabbri, Alice, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Presentation of benefits and harms of antidepressants on websites: A cross-sectional study
por: Demasi, Maryanne, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Collaboration between academics and industry in clinical trials: cross sectional study of publications and survey of lead academic authors
por: Rasmussen, Kristine, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Citations of scientific results and conflicts of interest: the case of mammography screening
por: Rasmussen, Kristine, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Sponsors’ participation in conduct and reporting of industry trials: a descriptive study
por: Lundh, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Regular Health Checks: Cross-Sectional Survey
por: Grønhøj Larsen, Christian, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_0i52gbcfq2hjqmql9fge9me96g