Cargando…

Effectiveness guidance document (EGD) for Chinese medicine trials: a consensus document

BACKGROUND: There is a need for more Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) on Chinese medicine (CM) to inform clinical and policy decision-making. This document aims to provide consensus advice for the design of CER trials on CM for researchers. It broadly aims to ensure more adequate design and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Witt, Claudia M, Aickin, Mikel, Cherkin, Daniel, Che, Chun Tao, Elder, Charles, Flower, Andrew, Hammerschlag, Richard, Liu, Jian-Ping, Lao, Lixing, Phurrough, Steve, Ritenbaugh, Cheryl, Rubin, Lee Hullender, Schnyer, Rosa, Wayne, Peter M, Withers, Shelly Rafferty, Zhao-Xiang, Bian, Young, Jeanette, Berman, Brian M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4045891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-169
_version_ 1782319403514200064
author Witt, Claudia M
Aickin, Mikel
Cherkin, Daniel
Che, Chun Tao
Elder, Charles
Flower, Andrew
Hammerschlag, Richard
Liu, Jian-Ping
Lao, Lixing
Phurrough, Steve
Ritenbaugh, Cheryl
Rubin, Lee Hullender
Schnyer, Rosa
Wayne, Peter M
Withers, Shelly Rafferty
Zhao-Xiang, Bian
Young, Jeanette
Berman, Brian M
author_facet Witt, Claudia M
Aickin, Mikel
Cherkin, Daniel
Che, Chun Tao
Elder, Charles
Flower, Andrew
Hammerschlag, Richard
Liu, Jian-Ping
Lao, Lixing
Phurrough, Steve
Ritenbaugh, Cheryl
Rubin, Lee Hullender
Schnyer, Rosa
Wayne, Peter M
Withers, Shelly Rafferty
Zhao-Xiang, Bian
Young, Jeanette
Berman, Brian M
author_sort Witt, Claudia M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a need for more Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) on Chinese medicine (CM) to inform clinical and policy decision-making. This document aims to provide consensus advice for the design of CER trials on CM for researchers. It broadly aims to ensure more adequate design and optimal use of resources in generating evidence for CM to inform stakeholder decision-making. METHODS: The Effectiveness Guidance Document (EGD) development was based on multiple consensus procedures (survey, written Delphi rounds, interactive consensus workshop, international expert review). To balance aspects of internal and external validity, multiple stakeholders, including patients, clinicians, researchers and payers were involved in creating this document. RESULTS: Recommendations were developed for “using available data” and “future clinical studies”. The recommendations for future trials focus on randomized trials and cover the following areas: designing CER studies, treatments, expertise and setting, outcomes, study design and statistical analyses, economic evaluation, and publication. CONCLUSION: The present EGD provides the first systematic methodological guidance for future CER trials on CM and can be applied to single or multi-component treatments. While CONSORT statements provide guidelines for reporting studies, EGDs provide recommendations for the design of future studies and can contribute to a more strategic use of limited research resources, as well as greater consistency in trial design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4045891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40458912014-06-06 Effectiveness guidance document (EGD) for Chinese medicine trials: a consensus document Witt, Claudia M Aickin, Mikel Cherkin, Daniel Che, Chun Tao Elder, Charles Flower, Andrew Hammerschlag, Richard Liu, Jian-Ping Lao, Lixing Phurrough, Steve Ritenbaugh, Cheryl Rubin, Lee Hullender Schnyer, Rosa Wayne, Peter M Withers, Shelly Rafferty Zhao-Xiang, Bian Young, Jeanette Berman, Brian M Trials Methodology BACKGROUND: There is a need for more Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) on Chinese medicine (CM) to inform clinical and policy decision-making. This document aims to provide consensus advice for the design of CER trials on CM for researchers. It broadly aims to ensure more adequate design and optimal use of resources in generating evidence for CM to inform stakeholder decision-making. METHODS: The Effectiveness Guidance Document (EGD) development was based on multiple consensus procedures (survey, written Delphi rounds, interactive consensus workshop, international expert review). To balance aspects of internal and external validity, multiple stakeholders, including patients, clinicians, researchers and payers were involved in creating this document. RESULTS: Recommendations were developed for “using available data” and “future clinical studies”. The recommendations for future trials focus on randomized trials and cover the following areas: designing CER studies, treatments, expertise and setting, outcomes, study design and statistical analyses, economic evaluation, and publication. CONCLUSION: The present EGD provides the first systematic methodological guidance for future CER trials on CM and can be applied to single or multi-component treatments. While CONSORT statements provide guidelines for reporting studies, EGDs provide recommendations for the design of future studies and can contribute to a more strategic use of limited research resources, as well as greater consistency in trial design. BioMed Central 2014-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4045891/ /pubmed/24885146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-169 Text en Copyright © 2014 Witt et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Witt, Claudia M
Aickin, Mikel
Cherkin, Daniel
Che, Chun Tao
Elder, Charles
Flower, Andrew
Hammerschlag, Richard
Liu, Jian-Ping
Lao, Lixing
Phurrough, Steve
Ritenbaugh, Cheryl
Rubin, Lee Hullender
Schnyer, Rosa
Wayne, Peter M
Withers, Shelly Rafferty
Zhao-Xiang, Bian
Young, Jeanette
Berman, Brian M
Effectiveness guidance document (EGD) for Chinese medicine trials: a consensus document
title Effectiveness guidance document (EGD) for Chinese medicine trials: a consensus document
title_full Effectiveness guidance document (EGD) for Chinese medicine trials: a consensus document
title_fullStr Effectiveness guidance document (EGD) for Chinese medicine trials: a consensus document
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness guidance document (EGD) for Chinese medicine trials: a consensus document
title_short Effectiveness guidance document (EGD) for Chinese medicine trials: a consensus document
title_sort effectiveness guidance document (egd) for chinese medicine trials: a consensus document
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4045891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-169
work_keys_str_mv AT wittclaudiam effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforchinesemedicinetrialsaconsensusdocument
AT aickinmikel effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforchinesemedicinetrialsaconsensusdocument
AT cherkindaniel effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforchinesemedicinetrialsaconsensusdocument
AT chechuntao effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforchinesemedicinetrialsaconsensusdocument
AT eldercharles effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforchinesemedicinetrialsaconsensusdocument
AT flowerandrew effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforchinesemedicinetrialsaconsensusdocument
AT hammerschlagrichard effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforchinesemedicinetrialsaconsensusdocument
AT liujianping effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforchinesemedicinetrialsaconsensusdocument
AT laolixing effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforchinesemedicinetrialsaconsensusdocument
AT phurroughsteve effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforchinesemedicinetrialsaconsensusdocument
AT ritenbaughcheryl effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforchinesemedicinetrialsaconsensusdocument
AT rubinleehullender effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforchinesemedicinetrialsaconsensusdocument
AT schnyerrosa effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforchinesemedicinetrialsaconsensusdocument
AT waynepeterm effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforchinesemedicinetrialsaconsensusdocument
AT withersshellyrafferty effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforchinesemedicinetrialsaconsensusdocument
AT zhaoxiangbian effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforchinesemedicinetrialsaconsensusdocument
AT youngjeanette effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforchinesemedicinetrialsaconsensusdocument
AT bermanbrianm effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforchinesemedicinetrialsaconsensusdocument