Cargando…
Sealing versus partial caries removal in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial
BACKGROUND: The resin-based pit and fissure sealant is considered a successful tool in caries prevention, however there is a growing evidence of its use in controlling already established caries in posterior teeth. The aim of this clinical trial is to verify the efficacy of pit and fissure sealants...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4045925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24884684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-58 |
_version_ | 1782319411473940480 |
---|---|
author | Hesse, Daniela Bonifácio, Clarissa Calil Mendes, Fausto Medeiros Braga, Mariana Minatel Imparato, José Carlos Pettorossi Raggio, Daniela Prócida |
author_facet | Hesse, Daniela Bonifácio, Clarissa Calil Mendes, Fausto Medeiros Braga, Mariana Minatel Imparato, José Carlos Pettorossi Raggio, Daniela Prócida |
author_sort | Hesse, Daniela |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The resin-based pit and fissure sealant is considered a successful tool in caries prevention, however there is a growing evidence of its use in controlling already established caries in posterior teeth. The aim of this clinical trial is to verify the efficacy of pit and fissure sealants in arresting dentinal caries lesions compared to partial excavation and restorative treatment in primary molar teeth. METHODS: Thirty six patients with occlusal cavitated primary molar reaching outer half of dentin were selected. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups: sealant application (experimental group – n = 17) and restoration with composite resin (control group – n = 19). Clinical and radiograph evaluation were performed after 6, 12 and 18 months. The chi-square test was used to verify the distribution of characteristics variables of the sample among the groups. The survival rate of treatments was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier survival and log-rank test. Fisher’s Exact and logistic regression tests were calculated in each evaluation period (α = 5%). RESULTS: The control group showed significantly better clinical survival after 18 months (p = 0.0025). In both groups, no caries progression was registered on the radiographic evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: Sealing had similar efficacy in the arrestment of caries progression of cavitated occlusal lesions compared to partial excavation of the lesions, even though the frequency of re-treatments was significantly higher in sealed lesions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos (ReBEC): RBR-9kkv53 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4045925 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40459252014-06-06 Sealing versus partial caries removal in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial Hesse, Daniela Bonifácio, Clarissa Calil Mendes, Fausto Medeiros Braga, Mariana Minatel Imparato, José Carlos Pettorossi Raggio, Daniela Prócida BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The resin-based pit and fissure sealant is considered a successful tool in caries prevention, however there is a growing evidence of its use in controlling already established caries in posterior teeth. The aim of this clinical trial is to verify the efficacy of pit and fissure sealants in arresting dentinal caries lesions compared to partial excavation and restorative treatment in primary molar teeth. METHODS: Thirty six patients with occlusal cavitated primary molar reaching outer half of dentin were selected. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups: sealant application (experimental group – n = 17) and restoration with composite resin (control group – n = 19). Clinical and radiograph evaluation were performed after 6, 12 and 18 months. The chi-square test was used to verify the distribution of characteristics variables of the sample among the groups. The survival rate of treatments was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier survival and log-rank test. Fisher’s Exact and logistic regression tests were calculated in each evaluation period (α = 5%). RESULTS: The control group showed significantly better clinical survival after 18 months (p = 0.0025). In both groups, no caries progression was registered on the radiographic evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: Sealing had similar efficacy in the arrestment of caries progression of cavitated occlusal lesions compared to partial excavation of the lesions, even though the frequency of re-treatments was significantly higher in sealed lesions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos (ReBEC): RBR-9kkv53 BioMed Central 2014-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4045925/ /pubmed/24884684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-58 Text en Copyright © 2014 Hesse et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hesse, Daniela Bonifácio, Clarissa Calil Mendes, Fausto Medeiros Braga, Mariana Minatel Imparato, José Carlos Pettorossi Raggio, Daniela Prócida Sealing versus partial caries removal in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial |
title | Sealing versus partial caries removal in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial |
title_full | Sealing versus partial caries removal in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Sealing versus partial caries removal in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Sealing versus partial caries removal in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial |
title_short | Sealing versus partial caries removal in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial |
title_sort | sealing versus partial caries removal in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4045925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24884684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-58 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hessedaniela sealingversuspartialcariesremovalinprimarymolarsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT bonifacioclarissacalil sealingversuspartialcariesremovalinprimarymolarsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT mendesfaustomedeiros sealingversuspartialcariesremovalinprimarymolarsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT bragamarianaminatel sealingversuspartialcariesremovalinprimarymolarsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT imparatojosecarlospettorossi sealingversuspartialcariesremovalinprimarymolarsarandomizedclinicaltrial AT raggiodanielaprocida sealingversuspartialcariesremovalinprimarymolarsarandomizedclinicaltrial |