Cargando…

Detecting the neuropathic pain component in the clinical setting: a study protocol for validation of screening instruments for the presence of a neuropathic pain component

BACKGROUND: The presence of nerve damage plays a key role in the development and prognosis of chronic pain states. Assessment of the presence and severity of a neuropathic pain component (NePC) is key in diagnosing chronic pain patients. Low back pain (LBP) and neck and shoulder pain (NSP) are highl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Timmerman, Hans, Wilder-Smith, Oliver, van Weel, Chris, Wolff, André, Vissers, Kris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4046010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-14-94
_version_ 1782319432575483904
author Timmerman, Hans
Wilder-Smith, Oliver
van Weel, Chris
Wolff, André
Vissers, Kris
author_facet Timmerman, Hans
Wilder-Smith, Oliver
van Weel, Chris
Wolff, André
Vissers, Kris
author_sort Timmerman, Hans
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The presence of nerve damage plays a key role in the development and prognosis of chronic pain states. Assessment of the presence and severity of a neuropathic pain component (NePC) is key in diagnosing chronic pain patients. Low back pain (LBP) and neck and shoulder pain (NSP) are highly prevalent and clinically important medical and societal problems in which a NePC is frequently present. The more severe the NePC, the worse the course of the pain, its prognosis and the results of treatment. Reliable and standardised diagnosis of the NePC remains difficult to achieve. Standardized and validated screening tools may help to reliably identify the NePC in individual chronic pain patients. The aim of this study is to validate the Dutch language versions of the PainDETECT Questionnaire (PDQ(-Dlv)) and the ‘Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions’ (DN4(-Dlv)) for use in primary and specialist medical care settings to screen for a NePC in patients with chronic pain due to (1) LBP, (2) NSP or (3) known peripheral nerve damage (PND). METHODS/DESIGN: The study design is cross-sectional to assess the validity of the PDQ(-Dlv) and the DN4(-Dlv) with 2 weeks follow-up for test-retest reliability and 3 months follow-up for monitoring and prognosis. 438 patients with chronic pain due to (1) LBP, (2) NSP or (3) PND. will be included in this study. Based on the IASP definition of neuropathic pain, two physicians will independently assess whether the patient has a NEPC or not. This result will be compared with the outcome of the PDQ(-Dlv) & DN4(-Dlv), the grading system for neuropathic pain, bed side examination and quantitative sensory testing. This study will further collect data regarding prevalence of NePC, general health status, mental health status, functioning, pain attribution and quality of life. DISCUSSION: The rationale for this study is to provide detailed information on the clinimetric quality of the PDQ(-Dlv) and DN4(-Dlv) in Dutch speaking countries. Our innovative multi-factorial approach should help achieve more reliable diagnosis and quantification of a NePC in patients with chronic pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR3030).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4046010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40460102014-06-06 Detecting the neuropathic pain component in the clinical setting: a study protocol for validation of screening instruments for the presence of a neuropathic pain component Timmerman, Hans Wilder-Smith, Oliver van Weel, Chris Wolff, André Vissers, Kris BMC Neurol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The presence of nerve damage plays a key role in the development and prognosis of chronic pain states. Assessment of the presence and severity of a neuropathic pain component (NePC) is key in diagnosing chronic pain patients. Low back pain (LBP) and neck and shoulder pain (NSP) are highly prevalent and clinically important medical and societal problems in which a NePC is frequently present. The more severe the NePC, the worse the course of the pain, its prognosis and the results of treatment. Reliable and standardised diagnosis of the NePC remains difficult to achieve. Standardized and validated screening tools may help to reliably identify the NePC in individual chronic pain patients. The aim of this study is to validate the Dutch language versions of the PainDETECT Questionnaire (PDQ(-Dlv)) and the ‘Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions’ (DN4(-Dlv)) for use in primary and specialist medical care settings to screen for a NePC in patients with chronic pain due to (1) LBP, (2) NSP or (3) known peripheral nerve damage (PND). METHODS/DESIGN: The study design is cross-sectional to assess the validity of the PDQ(-Dlv) and the DN4(-Dlv) with 2 weeks follow-up for test-retest reliability and 3 months follow-up for monitoring and prognosis. 438 patients with chronic pain due to (1) LBP, (2) NSP or (3) PND. will be included in this study. Based on the IASP definition of neuropathic pain, two physicians will independently assess whether the patient has a NEPC or not. This result will be compared with the outcome of the PDQ(-Dlv) & DN4(-Dlv), the grading system for neuropathic pain, bed side examination and quantitative sensory testing. This study will further collect data regarding prevalence of NePC, general health status, mental health status, functioning, pain attribution and quality of life. DISCUSSION: The rationale for this study is to provide detailed information on the clinimetric quality of the PDQ(-Dlv) and DN4(-Dlv) in Dutch speaking countries. Our innovative multi-factorial approach should help achieve more reliable diagnosis and quantification of a NePC in patients with chronic pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR3030). BioMed Central 2014-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4046010/ /pubmed/24885108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-14-94 Text en Copyright © 2014 Timmerman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Timmerman, Hans
Wilder-Smith, Oliver
van Weel, Chris
Wolff, André
Vissers, Kris
Detecting the neuropathic pain component in the clinical setting: a study protocol for validation of screening instruments for the presence of a neuropathic pain component
title Detecting the neuropathic pain component in the clinical setting: a study protocol for validation of screening instruments for the presence of a neuropathic pain component
title_full Detecting the neuropathic pain component in the clinical setting: a study protocol for validation of screening instruments for the presence of a neuropathic pain component
title_fullStr Detecting the neuropathic pain component in the clinical setting: a study protocol for validation of screening instruments for the presence of a neuropathic pain component
title_full_unstemmed Detecting the neuropathic pain component in the clinical setting: a study protocol for validation of screening instruments for the presence of a neuropathic pain component
title_short Detecting the neuropathic pain component in the clinical setting: a study protocol for validation of screening instruments for the presence of a neuropathic pain component
title_sort detecting the neuropathic pain component in the clinical setting: a study protocol for validation of screening instruments for the presence of a neuropathic pain component
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4046010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-14-94
work_keys_str_mv AT timmermanhans detectingtheneuropathicpaincomponentintheclinicalsettingastudyprotocolforvalidationofscreeninginstrumentsforthepresenceofaneuropathicpaincomponent
AT wildersmitholiver detectingtheneuropathicpaincomponentintheclinicalsettingastudyprotocolforvalidationofscreeninginstrumentsforthepresenceofaneuropathicpaincomponent
AT vanweelchris detectingtheneuropathicpaincomponentintheclinicalsettingastudyprotocolforvalidationofscreeninginstrumentsforthepresenceofaneuropathicpaincomponent
AT wolffandre detectingtheneuropathicpaincomponentintheclinicalsettingastudyprotocolforvalidationofscreeninginstrumentsforthepresenceofaneuropathicpaincomponent
AT visserskris detectingtheneuropathicpaincomponentintheclinicalsettingastudyprotocolforvalidationofscreeninginstrumentsforthepresenceofaneuropathicpaincomponent