Cargando…

Transcranial doppler ultrasonography should it be the first choice for persistent foramen ovale screening?

BACKGROUND: Persistent foramen ovale (PFO) is considered a cause of cryptogenic stroke and a risk factor for neurological events in young patients. The reference standard for identifying a PFO is contrast-enhanced transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The goal of this study was to evaluate the fea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Komar, Monika, Olszowska, Maria, Przewłocki, Tadeusz, Podolec, Jakub, Stępniewski, Jakub, Sobień, Bartosz, Badacz, Rafał, Kabłak-Ziembicka, Anna, Tomkiewicz-Pająk, Lidia, Podolec, Piotr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4046065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24884981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-12-16
_version_ 1782319447123427328
author Komar, Monika
Olszowska, Maria
Przewłocki, Tadeusz
Podolec, Jakub
Stępniewski, Jakub
Sobień, Bartosz
Badacz, Rafał
Kabłak-Ziembicka, Anna
Tomkiewicz-Pająk, Lidia
Podolec, Piotr
author_facet Komar, Monika
Olszowska, Maria
Przewłocki, Tadeusz
Podolec, Jakub
Stępniewski, Jakub
Sobień, Bartosz
Badacz, Rafał
Kabłak-Ziembicka, Anna
Tomkiewicz-Pająk, Lidia
Podolec, Piotr
author_sort Komar, Monika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Persistent foramen ovale (PFO) is considered a cause of cryptogenic stroke and a risk factor for neurological events in young patients. The reference standard for identifying a PFO is contrast-enhanced transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of transcranial color Doppler (TCD) and its diagnostic sensitivity compared with TEE. METHODS: We investigated 420 patients admitted to our department with cryptogenic stroke, transient ischemic attacks or other neurological symptoms. All patients underwent TCD and TEE evaluation. TCD and TEE examinations were performed according to a standardized procedure: air-mixed saline was injected into the right antecubital vein three times, while the Doppler signal was recorded during the Valsalva maneuver. During TCD the passage of contrast into the right-middle cerebral artery was recorded 25 seconds following the Valsalva maneuver. RESULTS: We detected a right-to-left shunt in 220 patients (52.3%) and no-shunts in 159 patients (37.9%) with both TCD and TEE. In 20 (4.8%) patients TEE did not reveal contrast passage which was then detected by TCD. In 21 (5.0%) patients only TEE revealed a PFO. The feasibility of both methods was 100%. TCD had a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 92% in the diagnosis of PFO. CONCLUSIONS: TCD has a relatively good sensitivity and specificity. TCD and TEE are complementary diagnostic tests for PFO, but TCD should be recommended as the first choice for screening because of its simplicity, non-invasive character, low cost and high feasibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4046065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40460652014-06-20 Transcranial doppler ultrasonography should it be the first choice for persistent foramen ovale screening? Komar, Monika Olszowska, Maria Przewłocki, Tadeusz Podolec, Jakub Stępniewski, Jakub Sobień, Bartosz Badacz, Rafał Kabłak-Ziembicka, Anna Tomkiewicz-Pająk, Lidia Podolec, Piotr Cardiovasc Ultrasound Research BACKGROUND: Persistent foramen ovale (PFO) is considered a cause of cryptogenic stroke and a risk factor for neurological events in young patients. The reference standard for identifying a PFO is contrast-enhanced transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of transcranial color Doppler (TCD) and its diagnostic sensitivity compared with TEE. METHODS: We investigated 420 patients admitted to our department with cryptogenic stroke, transient ischemic attacks or other neurological symptoms. All patients underwent TCD and TEE evaluation. TCD and TEE examinations were performed according to a standardized procedure: air-mixed saline was injected into the right antecubital vein three times, while the Doppler signal was recorded during the Valsalva maneuver. During TCD the passage of contrast into the right-middle cerebral artery was recorded 25 seconds following the Valsalva maneuver. RESULTS: We detected a right-to-left shunt in 220 patients (52.3%) and no-shunts in 159 patients (37.9%) with both TCD and TEE. In 20 (4.8%) patients TEE did not reveal contrast passage which was then detected by TCD. In 21 (5.0%) patients only TEE revealed a PFO. The feasibility of both methods was 100%. TCD had a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 92% in the diagnosis of PFO. CONCLUSIONS: TCD has a relatively good sensitivity and specificity. TCD and TEE are complementary diagnostic tests for PFO, but TCD should be recommended as the first choice for screening because of its simplicity, non-invasive character, low cost and high feasibility. BioMed Central 2014-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4046065/ /pubmed/24884981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-12-16 Text en Copyright © 2014 Komar et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Komar, Monika
Olszowska, Maria
Przewłocki, Tadeusz
Podolec, Jakub
Stępniewski, Jakub
Sobień, Bartosz
Badacz, Rafał
Kabłak-Ziembicka, Anna
Tomkiewicz-Pająk, Lidia
Podolec, Piotr
Transcranial doppler ultrasonography should it be the first choice for persistent foramen ovale screening?
title Transcranial doppler ultrasonography should it be the first choice for persistent foramen ovale screening?
title_full Transcranial doppler ultrasonography should it be the first choice for persistent foramen ovale screening?
title_fullStr Transcranial doppler ultrasonography should it be the first choice for persistent foramen ovale screening?
title_full_unstemmed Transcranial doppler ultrasonography should it be the first choice for persistent foramen ovale screening?
title_short Transcranial doppler ultrasonography should it be the first choice for persistent foramen ovale screening?
title_sort transcranial doppler ultrasonography should it be the first choice for persistent foramen ovale screening?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4046065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24884981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-12-16
work_keys_str_mv AT komarmonika transcranialdopplerultrasonographyshoulditbethefirstchoiceforpersistentforamenovalescreening
AT olszowskamaria transcranialdopplerultrasonographyshoulditbethefirstchoiceforpersistentforamenovalescreening
AT przewłockitadeusz transcranialdopplerultrasonographyshoulditbethefirstchoiceforpersistentforamenovalescreening
AT podolecjakub transcranialdopplerultrasonographyshoulditbethefirstchoiceforpersistentforamenovalescreening
AT stepniewskijakub transcranialdopplerultrasonographyshoulditbethefirstchoiceforpersistentforamenovalescreening
AT sobienbartosz transcranialdopplerultrasonographyshoulditbethefirstchoiceforpersistentforamenovalescreening
AT badaczrafał transcranialdopplerultrasonographyshoulditbethefirstchoiceforpersistentforamenovalescreening
AT kabłakziembickaanna transcranialdopplerultrasonographyshoulditbethefirstchoiceforpersistentforamenovalescreening
AT tomkiewiczpajaklidia transcranialdopplerultrasonographyshoulditbethefirstchoiceforpersistentforamenovalescreening
AT podolecpiotr transcranialdopplerultrasonographyshoulditbethefirstchoiceforpersistentforamenovalescreening