Cargando…

Mass distribution of free insecticide-treated nets do not interfere with continuous net distribution in Tanzania

BACKGROUND: To protect the most vulnerable groups from malaria (pregnant women and infants) the Tanzanian Government introduced a subsidy (voucher) scheme in 2004, on the basis of a public-private partnership. These vouchers are provided to pregnant women at their first antenatal care visit and moth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eze, Ikenna C, Kramer, Karen, Msengwa, Amina, Mandike, Renata, Lengeler, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4046070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24884786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-196
_version_ 1782319448996184064
author Eze, Ikenna C
Kramer, Karen
Msengwa, Amina
Mandike, Renata
Lengeler, Christian
author_facet Eze, Ikenna C
Kramer, Karen
Msengwa, Amina
Mandike, Renata
Lengeler, Christian
author_sort Eze, Ikenna C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To protect the most vulnerable groups from malaria (pregnant women and infants) the Tanzanian Government introduced a subsidy (voucher) scheme in 2004, on the basis of a public-private partnership. These vouchers are provided to pregnant women at their first antenatal care visit and mothers of infants at first vaccination. The vouchers are redeemed at registered retailers for a long-lasting insecticidal net against the payment of a modest top-up price. The present work analysed a large body of data from the Tanzanian National Voucher Scheme, focusing on interactions with concurrent mass distribution campaigns of free nets. METHODS: In an ecologic study involving all regions of Tanzania, voucher redemption data for the period 2007 2011, as well as data on potential determinants of voucher redemption were analysed. The four outcome variables were: pregnant woman and infant voucher redemption rates, use of treated bed nets by all household members and by under- five children. Each of the outcomes was regressed with selected determinants, using a generalized estimating equation model and accounting for regional data clustering. RESULTS: There was a consistent improvement in voucher redemption rates over the selected time period, with rates >80% in 2011. The major determinants of redemption rates were the top-up price paid by the voucher beneficiary, the retailer- clinic ratio, and socio-economic status. Improved redemption rates after 2009 were most likely due to reduced top-up prices (following a change in policy). Redemption rates were not affected by two major free net distribution campaigns. During this period, there was a consistent improvement in net use across all the regions, with rates of up to 75% in 2011. CONCLUSION: The key components of the National Treated Nets Programme (NATNETS) seem to work harmoniously, leading to a high level of net use in the entire population. This calls for the continuation of this effort in Tanzania and for emulation by other countries with endemic malaria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4046070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40460702014-06-06 Mass distribution of free insecticide-treated nets do not interfere with continuous net distribution in Tanzania Eze, Ikenna C Kramer, Karen Msengwa, Amina Mandike, Renata Lengeler, Christian Malar J Research BACKGROUND: To protect the most vulnerable groups from malaria (pregnant women and infants) the Tanzanian Government introduced a subsidy (voucher) scheme in 2004, on the basis of a public-private partnership. These vouchers are provided to pregnant women at their first antenatal care visit and mothers of infants at first vaccination. The vouchers are redeemed at registered retailers for a long-lasting insecticidal net against the payment of a modest top-up price. The present work analysed a large body of data from the Tanzanian National Voucher Scheme, focusing on interactions with concurrent mass distribution campaigns of free nets. METHODS: In an ecologic study involving all regions of Tanzania, voucher redemption data for the period 2007 2011, as well as data on potential determinants of voucher redemption were analysed. The four outcome variables were: pregnant woman and infant voucher redemption rates, use of treated bed nets by all household members and by under- five children. Each of the outcomes was regressed with selected determinants, using a generalized estimating equation model and accounting for regional data clustering. RESULTS: There was a consistent improvement in voucher redemption rates over the selected time period, with rates >80% in 2011. The major determinants of redemption rates were the top-up price paid by the voucher beneficiary, the retailer- clinic ratio, and socio-economic status. Improved redemption rates after 2009 were most likely due to reduced top-up prices (following a change in policy). Redemption rates were not affected by two major free net distribution campaigns. During this period, there was a consistent improvement in net use across all the regions, with rates of up to 75% in 2011. CONCLUSION: The key components of the National Treated Nets Programme (NATNETS) seem to work harmoniously, leading to a high level of net use in the entire population. This calls for the continuation of this effort in Tanzania and for emulation by other countries with endemic malaria. BioMed Central 2014-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4046070/ /pubmed/24884786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-196 Text en Copyright © 2014 Eze et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Eze, Ikenna C
Kramer, Karen
Msengwa, Amina
Mandike, Renata
Lengeler, Christian
Mass distribution of free insecticide-treated nets do not interfere with continuous net distribution in Tanzania
title Mass distribution of free insecticide-treated nets do not interfere with continuous net distribution in Tanzania
title_full Mass distribution of free insecticide-treated nets do not interfere with continuous net distribution in Tanzania
title_fullStr Mass distribution of free insecticide-treated nets do not interfere with continuous net distribution in Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Mass distribution of free insecticide-treated nets do not interfere with continuous net distribution in Tanzania
title_short Mass distribution of free insecticide-treated nets do not interfere with continuous net distribution in Tanzania
title_sort mass distribution of free insecticide-treated nets do not interfere with continuous net distribution in tanzania
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4046070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24884786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-196
work_keys_str_mv AT ezeikennac massdistributionoffreeinsecticidetreatednetsdonotinterferewithcontinuousnetdistributionintanzania
AT kramerkaren massdistributionoffreeinsecticidetreatednetsdonotinterferewithcontinuousnetdistributionintanzania
AT msengwaamina massdistributionoffreeinsecticidetreatednetsdonotinterferewithcontinuousnetdistributionintanzania
AT mandikerenata massdistributionoffreeinsecticidetreatednetsdonotinterferewithcontinuousnetdistributionintanzania
AT lengelerchristian massdistributionoffreeinsecticidetreatednetsdonotinterferewithcontinuousnetdistributionintanzania