Cargando…

Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusion for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Rationale and Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Feasibility Trial

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) is the commonest reason for hospitalization with hemorrhage in the UK and the leading indication for transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs). Observational studies suggest an association between more liberal RBC transfusion and adverse patient outcomes, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jairath, Vipul, Kahan, Brennan C., Gray, Alasdair, Doré, Caroline J., Mora, Ana, Dyer, Claire, Stokes, Elizabeth A., Llewelyn, Charlotte, Bailey, Adam A., Dallal, Helen, Everett, Simon M., James, Martin W., Stanley, Adrian J., Church, Nicholas, Darwent, Melanie, Greenaway, John, Le Jeune, Ivan, Reckless, Ian, Campbell, Helen E., Meredith, Sarah, Palmer, Kelvin R., Logan, Richard F.A., Travis, Simon P.L., Walsh, Timothy S., Murphy, Michael F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Grune And Stratton 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4046243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23706959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2013.04.001
_version_ 1782480259600351232
author Jairath, Vipul
Kahan, Brennan C.
Gray, Alasdair
Doré, Caroline J.
Mora, Ana
Dyer, Claire
Stokes, Elizabeth A.
Llewelyn, Charlotte
Bailey, Adam A.
Dallal, Helen
Everett, Simon M.
James, Martin W.
Stanley, Adrian J.
Church, Nicholas
Darwent, Melanie
Greenaway, John
Le Jeune, Ivan
Reckless, Ian
Campbell, Helen E.
Meredith, Sarah
Palmer, Kelvin R.
Logan, Richard F.A.
Travis, Simon P.L.
Walsh, Timothy S.
Murphy, Michael F.
author_facet Jairath, Vipul
Kahan, Brennan C.
Gray, Alasdair
Doré, Caroline J.
Mora, Ana
Dyer, Claire
Stokes, Elizabeth A.
Llewelyn, Charlotte
Bailey, Adam A.
Dallal, Helen
Everett, Simon M.
James, Martin W.
Stanley, Adrian J.
Church, Nicholas
Darwent, Melanie
Greenaway, John
Le Jeune, Ivan
Reckless, Ian
Campbell, Helen E.
Meredith, Sarah
Palmer, Kelvin R.
Logan, Richard F.A.
Travis, Simon P.L.
Walsh, Timothy S.
Murphy, Michael F.
author_sort Jairath, Vipul
collection PubMed
description Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) is the commonest reason for hospitalization with hemorrhage in the UK and the leading indication for transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs). Observational studies suggest an association between more liberal RBC transfusion and adverse patient outcomes, and a recent randomised trial reported increased further bleeding and mortality with a liberal transfusion policy. TRIGGER (Transfusion in Gastrointestinal Bleeding) is a pragmatic, cluster randomized trial which aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of implementing a restrictive versus liberal RBC transfusion policy in adult patients admitted with AUGIB. The trial will take place in 6 UK hospitals, and each centre will be randomly allocated to a transfusion policy. Clinicians throughout each hospital will manage all eligible patients according to the transfusion policy for the 6-month trial recruitment period. In the restrictive centers, patients become eligible for RBC transfusion when their hemoglobin is < 8 g/dL. In the liberal centers patients become eligible for transfusion once their hemoglobin is < 10 g/dL. All clinicians will have the discretion to transfuse outside of the policy but will be asked to document the reasons for doing so. Feasibility outcome measures include protocol adherence, recruitment rate, and evidence of selection bias. Clinical outcome measures include further bleeding, mortality, thromboembolic events, and infections. Quality of life will be measured using the EuroQol EQ-5D at day 28, and the costs associated with hospitalization for AUGIB in the UK will be estimated. Consent will be sought from participants or their representatives according to patient capacity for use of routine hospital data and day 28 follow up. The study has ethical approval for conduct in England and Scotland. Results will be analysed according to a pre-defined statistical analysis plan and disseminated in peer reviewed publications to relevant stakeholders. The results of this study will inform the feasibility and design of a phase III randomized trial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4046243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Grune And Stratton
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40462432014-06-06 Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusion for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Rationale and Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Feasibility Trial Jairath, Vipul Kahan, Brennan C. Gray, Alasdair Doré, Caroline J. Mora, Ana Dyer, Claire Stokes, Elizabeth A. Llewelyn, Charlotte Bailey, Adam A. Dallal, Helen Everett, Simon M. James, Martin W. Stanley, Adrian J. Church, Nicholas Darwent, Melanie Greenaway, John Le Jeune, Ivan Reckless, Ian Campbell, Helen E. Meredith, Sarah Palmer, Kelvin R. Logan, Richard F.A. Travis, Simon P.L. Walsh, Timothy S. Murphy, Michael F. Transfus Med Rev Article Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) is the commonest reason for hospitalization with hemorrhage in the UK and the leading indication for transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs). Observational studies suggest an association between more liberal RBC transfusion and adverse patient outcomes, and a recent randomised trial reported increased further bleeding and mortality with a liberal transfusion policy. TRIGGER (Transfusion in Gastrointestinal Bleeding) is a pragmatic, cluster randomized trial which aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of implementing a restrictive versus liberal RBC transfusion policy in adult patients admitted with AUGIB. The trial will take place in 6 UK hospitals, and each centre will be randomly allocated to a transfusion policy. Clinicians throughout each hospital will manage all eligible patients according to the transfusion policy for the 6-month trial recruitment period. In the restrictive centers, patients become eligible for RBC transfusion when their hemoglobin is < 8 g/dL. In the liberal centers patients become eligible for transfusion once their hemoglobin is < 10 g/dL. All clinicians will have the discretion to transfuse outside of the policy but will be asked to document the reasons for doing so. Feasibility outcome measures include protocol adherence, recruitment rate, and evidence of selection bias. Clinical outcome measures include further bleeding, mortality, thromboembolic events, and infections. Quality of life will be measured using the EuroQol EQ-5D at day 28, and the costs associated with hospitalization for AUGIB in the UK will be estimated. Consent will be sought from participants or their representatives according to patient capacity for use of routine hospital data and day 28 follow up. The study has ethical approval for conduct in England and Scotland. Results will be analysed according to a pre-defined statistical analysis plan and disseminated in peer reviewed publications to relevant stakeholders. The results of this study will inform the feasibility and design of a phase III randomized trial. Grune And Stratton 2013-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4046243/ /pubmed/23706959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2013.04.001 Text en © 2013 Elsevier Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jairath, Vipul
Kahan, Brennan C.
Gray, Alasdair
Doré, Caroline J.
Mora, Ana
Dyer, Claire
Stokes, Elizabeth A.
Llewelyn, Charlotte
Bailey, Adam A.
Dallal, Helen
Everett, Simon M.
James, Martin W.
Stanley, Adrian J.
Church, Nicholas
Darwent, Melanie
Greenaway, John
Le Jeune, Ivan
Reckless, Ian
Campbell, Helen E.
Meredith, Sarah
Palmer, Kelvin R.
Logan, Richard F.A.
Travis, Simon P.L.
Walsh, Timothy S.
Murphy, Michael F.
Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusion for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Rationale and Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Feasibility Trial
title Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusion for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Rationale and Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Feasibility Trial
title_full Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusion for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Rationale and Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Feasibility Trial
title_fullStr Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusion for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Rationale and Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Feasibility Trial
title_full_unstemmed Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusion for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Rationale and Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Feasibility Trial
title_short Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusion for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Rationale and Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Feasibility Trial
title_sort restrictive vs liberal blood transfusion for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: rationale and protocol for a cluster randomized feasibility trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4046243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23706959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2013.04.001
work_keys_str_mv AT jairathvipul restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial
AT kahanbrennanc restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial
AT grayalasdair restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial
AT dorecarolinej restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial
AT moraana restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial
AT dyerclaire restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial
AT stokeselizabetha restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial
AT llewelyncharlotte restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial
AT baileyadama restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial
AT dallalhelen restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial
AT everettsimonm restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial
AT jamesmartinw restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial
AT stanleyadrianj restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial
AT churchnicholas restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial
AT darwentmelanie restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial
AT greenawayjohn restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial
AT lejeuneivan restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial
AT recklessian restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial
AT campbellhelene restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial
AT meredithsarah restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial
AT palmerkelvinr restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial
AT loganrichardfa restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial
AT travissimonpl restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial
AT walshtimothys restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial
AT murphymichaelf restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial