Cargando…
Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusion for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Rationale and Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Feasibility Trial
Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) is the commonest reason for hospitalization with hemorrhage in the UK and the leading indication for transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs). Observational studies suggest an association between more liberal RBC transfusion and adverse patient outcomes, an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Grune And Stratton
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4046243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23706959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2013.04.001 |
_version_ | 1782480259600351232 |
---|---|
author | Jairath, Vipul Kahan, Brennan C. Gray, Alasdair Doré, Caroline J. Mora, Ana Dyer, Claire Stokes, Elizabeth A. Llewelyn, Charlotte Bailey, Adam A. Dallal, Helen Everett, Simon M. James, Martin W. Stanley, Adrian J. Church, Nicholas Darwent, Melanie Greenaway, John Le Jeune, Ivan Reckless, Ian Campbell, Helen E. Meredith, Sarah Palmer, Kelvin R. Logan, Richard F.A. Travis, Simon P.L. Walsh, Timothy S. Murphy, Michael F. |
author_facet | Jairath, Vipul Kahan, Brennan C. Gray, Alasdair Doré, Caroline J. Mora, Ana Dyer, Claire Stokes, Elizabeth A. Llewelyn, Charlotte Bailey, Adam A. Dallal, Helen Everett, Simon M. James, Martin W. Stanley, Adrian J. Church, Nicholas Darwent, Melanie Greenaway, John Le Jeune, Ivan Reckless, Ian Campbell, Helen E. Meredith, Sarah Palmer, Kelvin R. Logan, Richard F.A. Travis, Simon P.L. Walsh, Timothy S. Murphy, Michael F. |
author_sort | Jairath, Vipul |
collection | PubMed |
description | Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) is the commonest reason for hospitalization with hemorrhage in the UK and the leading indication for transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs). Observational studies suggest an association between more liberal RBC transfusion and adverse patient outcomes, and a recent randomised trial reported increased further bleeding and mortality with a liberal transfusion policy. TRIGGER (Transfusion in Gastrointestinal Bleeding) is a pragmatic, cluster randomized trial which aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of implementing a restrictive versus liberal RBC transfusion policy in adult patients admitted with AUGIB. The trial will take place in 6 UK hospitals, and each centre will be randomly allocated to a transfusion policy. Clinicians throughout each hospital will manage all eligible patients according to the transfusion policy for the 6-month trial recruitment period. In the restrictive centers, patients become eligible for RBC transfusion when their hemoglobin is < 8 g/dL. In the liberal centers patients become eligible for transfusion once their hemoglobin is < 10 g/dL. All clinicians will have the discretion to transfuse outside of the policy but will be asked to document the reasons for doing so. Feasibility outcome measures include protocol adherence, recruitment rate, and evidence of selection bias. Clinical outcome measures include further bleeding, mortality, thromboembolic events, and infections. Quality of life will be measured using the EuroQol EQ-5D at day 28, and the costs associated with hospitalization for AUGIB in the UK will be estimated. Consent will be sought from participants or their representatives according to patient capacity for use of routine hospital data and day 28 follow up. The study has ethical approval for conduct in England and Scotland. Results will be analysed according to a pre-defined statistical analysis plan and disseminated in peer reviewed publications to relevant stakeholders. The results of this study will inform the feasibility and design of a phase III randomized trial. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4046243 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Grune And Stratton |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40462432014-06-06 Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusion for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Rationale and Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Feasibility Trial Jairath, Vipul Kahan, Brennan C. Gray, Alasdair Doré, Caroline J. Mora, Ana Dyer, Claire Stokes, Elizabeth A. Llewelyn, Charlotte Bailey, Adam A. Dallal, Helen Everett, Simon M. James, Martin W. Stanley, Adrian J. Church, Nicholas Darwent, Melanie Greenaway, John Le Jeune, Ivan Reckless, Ian Campbell, Helen E. Meredith, Sarah Palmer, Kelvin R. Logan, Richard F.A. Travis, Simon P.L. Walsh, Timothy S. Murphy, Michael F. Transfus Med Rev Article Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) is the commonest reason for hospitalization with hemorrhage in the UK and the leading indication for transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs). Observational studies suggest an association between more liberal RBC transfusion and adverse patient outcomes, and a recent randomised trial reported increased further bleeding and mortality with a liberal transfusion policy. TRIGGER (Transfusion in Gastrointestinal Bleeding) is a pragmatic, cluster randomized trial which aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of implementing a restrictive versus liberal RBC transfusion policy in adult patients admitted with AUGIB. The trial will take place in 6 UK hospitals, and each centre will be randomly allocated to a transfusion policy. Clinicians throughout each hospital will manage all eligible patients according to the transfusion policy for the 6-month trial recruitment period. In the restrictive centers, patients become eligible for RBC transfusion when their hemoglobin is < 8 g/dL. In the liberal centers patients become eligible for transfusion once their hemoglobin is < 10 g/dL. All clinicians will have the discretion to transfuse outside of the policy but will be asked to document the reasons for doing so. Feasibility outcome measures include protocol adherence, recruitment rate, and evidence of selection bias. Clinical outcome measures include further bleeding, mortality, thromboembolic events, and infections. Quality of life will be measured using the EuroQol EQ-5D at day 28, and the costs associated with hospitalization for AUGIB in the UK will be estimated. Consent will be sought from participants or their representatives according to patient capacity for use of routine hospital data and day 28 follow up. The study has ethical approval for conduct in England and Scotland. Results will be analysed according to a pre-defined statistical analysis plan and disseminated in peer reviewed publications to relevant stakeholders. The results of this study will inform the feasibility and design of a phase III randomized trial. Grune And Stratton 2013-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4046243/ /pubmed/23706959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2013.04.001 Text en © 2013 Elsevier Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Jairath, Vipul Kahan, Brennan C. Gray, Alasdair Doré, Caroline J. Mora, Ana Dyer, Claire Stokes, Elizabeth A. Llewelyn, Charlotte Bailey, Adam A. Dallal, Helen Everett, Simon M. James, Martin W. Stanley, Adrian J. Church, Nicholas Darwent, Melanie Greenaway, John Le Jeune, Ivan Reckless, Ian Campbell, Helen E. Meredith, Sarah Palmer, Kelvin R. Logan, Richard F.A. Travis, Simon P.L. Walsh, Timothy S. Murphy, Michael F. Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusion for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Rationale and Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Feasibility Trial |
title | Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusion for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Rationale and Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Feasibility Trial |
title_full | Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusion for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Rationale and Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Feasibility Trial |
title_fullStr | Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusion for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Rationale and Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Feasibility Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusion for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Rationale and Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Feasibility Trial |
title_short | Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusion for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Rationale and Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Feasibility Trial |
title_sort | restrictive vs liberal blood transfusion for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: rationale and protocol for a cluster randomized feasibility trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4046243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23706959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2013.04.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jairathvipul restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial AT kahanbrennanc restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial AT grayalasdair restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial AT dorecarolinej restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial AT moraana restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial AT dyerclaire restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial AT stokeselizabetha restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial AT llewelyncharlotte restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial AT baileyadama restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial AT dallalhelen restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial AT everettsimonm restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial AT jamesmartinw restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial AT stanleyadrianj restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial AT churchnicholas restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial AT darwentmelanie restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial AT greenawayjohn restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial AT lejeuneivan restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial AT recklessian restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial AT campbellhelene restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial AT meredithsarah restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial AT palmerkelvinr restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial AT loganrichardfa restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial AT travissimonpl restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial AT walshtimothys restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial AT murphymichaelf restrictivevsliberalbloodtransfusionforacuteuppergastrointestinalbleedingrationaleandprotocolforaclusterrandomizedfeasibilitytrial |