Cargando…
What Is the Ability Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) Good for? An Evaluation Using Item Response Theory
The ability approach has been indicated as promising for advancing research in emotional intelligence (EI). However, there is scarcity of tests measuring EI as a form of intelligence. The Mayer Salovey Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test, or MSCEIT, is among the few available and the most widespread...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4046984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24901541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098827 |
_version_ | 1782480342363406336 |
---|---|
author | Fiori, Marina Antonietti, Jean-Philippe Mikolajczak, Moira Luminet, Olivier Hansenne, Michel Rossier, Jérôme |
author_facet | Fiori, Marina Antonietti, Jean-Philippe Mikolajczak, Moira Luminet, Olivier Hansenne, Michel Rossier, Jérôme |
author_sort | Fiori, Marina |
collection | PubMed |
description | The ability approach has been indicated as promising for advancing research in emotional intelligence (EI). However, there is scarcity of tests measuring EI as a form of intelligence. The Mayer Salovey Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test, or MSCEIT, is among the few available and the most widespread measure of EI as an ability. This implies that conclusions about the value of EI as a meaningful construct and about its utility in predicting various outcomes mainly rely on the properties of this test. We tested whether individuals who have the highest probability of choosing the most correct response on any item of the test are also those who have the strongest EI ability. Results showed that this is not the case for most items: The answer indicated by experts as the most correct in several cases was not associated with the highest ability; furthermore, items appeared too easy to challenge individuals high in EI. Overall results suggest that the MSCEIT is best suited to discriminate persons at the low end of the trait. Results are discussed in light of applied and theoretical considerations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4046984 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40469842014-06-09 What Is the Ability Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) Good for? An Evaluation Using Item Response Theory Fiori, Marina Antonietti, Jean-Philippe Mikolajczak, Moira Luminet, Olivier Hansenne, Michel Rossier, Jérôme PLoS One Research Article The ability approach has been indicated as promising for advancing research in emotional intelligence (EI). However, there is scarcity of tests measuring EI as a form of intelligence. The Mayer Salovey Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test, or MSCEIT, is among the few available and the most widespread measure of EI as an ability. This implies that conclusions about the value of EI as a meaningful construct and about its utility in predicting various outcomes mainly rely on the properties of this test. We tested whether individuals who have the highest probability of choosing the most correct response on any item of the test are also those who have the strongest EI ability. Results showed that this is not the case for most items: The answer indicated by experts as the most correct in several cases was not associated with the highest ability; furthermore, items appeared too easy to challenge individuals high in EI. Overall results suggest that the MSCEIT is best suited to discriminate persons at the low end of the trait. Results are discussed in light of applied and theoretical considerations. Public Library of Science 2014-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4046984/ /pubmed/24901541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098827 Text en © 2014 Fiori et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fiori, Marina Antonietti, Jean-Philippe Mikolajczak, Moira Luminet, Olivier Hansenne, Michel Rossier, Jérôme What Is the Ability Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) Good for? An Evaluation Using Item Response Theory |
title | What Is the Ability Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) Good for? An Evaluation Using Item Response Theory |
title_full | What Is the Ability Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) Good for? An Evaluation Using Item Response Theory |
title_fullStr | What Is the Ability Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) Good for? An Evaluation Using Item Response Theory |
title_full_unstemmed | What Is the Ability Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) Good for? An Evaluation Using Item Response Theory |
title_short | What Is the Ability Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) Good for? An Evaluation Using Item Response Theory |
title_sort | what is the ability emotional intelligence test (msceit) good for? an evaluation using item response theory |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4046984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24901541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098827 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fiorimarina whatistheabilityemotionalintelligencetestmsceitgoodforanevaluationusingitemresponsetheory AT antoniettijeanphilippe whatistheabilityemotionalintelligencetestmsceitgoodforanevaluationusingitemresponsetheory AT mikolajczakmoira whatistheabilityemotionalintelligencetestmsceitgoodforanevaluationusingitemresponsetheory AT luminetolivier whatistheabilityemotionalintelligencetestmsceitgoodforanevaluationusingitemresponsetheory AT hansennemichel whatistheabilityemotionalintelligencetestmsceitgoodforanevaluationusingitemresponsetheory AT rossierjerome whatistheabilityemotionalintelligencetestmsceitgoodforanevaluationusingitemresponsetheory |