Cargando…

What Is the Ability Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) Good for? An Evaluation Using Item Response Theory

The ability approach has been indicated as promising for advancing research in emotional intelligence (EI). However, there is scarcity of tests measuring EI as a form of intelligence. The Mayer Salovey Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test, or MSCEIT, is among the few available and the most widespread...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fiori, Marina, Antonietti, Jean-Philippe, Mikolajczak, Moira, Luminet, Olivier, Hansenne, Michel, Rossier, Jérôme
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4046984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24901541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098827
_version_ 1782480342363406336
author Fiori, Marina
Antonietti, Jean-Philippe
Mikolajczak, Moira
Luminet, Olivier
Hansenne, Michel
Rossier, Jérôme
author_facet Fiori, Marina
Antonietti, Jean-Philippe
Mikolajczak, Moira
Luminet, Olivier
Hansenne, Michel
Rossier, Jérôme
author_sort Fiori, Marina
collection PubMed
description The ability approach has been indicated as promising for advancing research in emotional intelligence (EI). However, there is scarcity of tests measuring EI as a form of intelligence. The Mayer Salovey Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test, or MSCEIT, is among the few available and the most widespread measure of EI as an ability. This implies that conclusions about the value of EI as a meaningful construct and about its utility in predicting various outcomes mainly rely on the properties of this test. We tested whether individuals who have the highest probability of choosing the most correct response on any item of the test are also those who have the strongest EI ability. Results showed that this is not the case for most items: The answer indicated by experts as the most correct in several cases was not associated with the highest ability; furthermore, items appeared too easy to challenge individuals high in EI. Overall results suggest that the MSCEIT is best suited to discriminate persons at the low end of the trait. Results are discussed in light of applied and theoretical considerations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4046984
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40469842014-06-09 What Is the Ability Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) Good for? An Evaluation Using Item Response Theory Fiori, Marina Antonietti, Jean-Philippe Mikolajczak, Moira Luminet, Olivier Hansenne, Michel Rossier, Jérôme PLoS One Research Article The ability approach has been indicated as promising for advancing research in emotional intelligence (EI). However, there is scarcity of tests measuring EI as a form of intelligence. The Mayer Salovey Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test, or MSCEIT, is among the few available and the most widespread measure of EI as an ability. This implies that conclusions about the value of EI as a meaningful construct and about its utility in predicting various outcomes mainly rely on the properties of this test. We tested whether individuals who have the highest probability of choosing the most correct response on any item of the test are also those who have the strongest EI ability. Results showed that this is not the case for most items: The answer indicated by experts as the most correct in several cases was not associated with the highest ability; furthermore, items appeared too easy to challenge individuals high in EI. Overall results suggest that the MSCEIT is best suited to discriminate persons at the low end of the trait. Results are discussed in light of applied and theoretical considerations. Public Library of Science 2014-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4046984/ /pubmed/24901541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098827 Text en © 2014 Fiori et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fiori, Marina
Antonietti, Jean-Philippe
Mikolajczak, Moira
Luminet, Olivier
Hansenne, Michel
Rossier, Jérôme
What Is the Ability Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) Good for? An Evaluation Using Item Response Theory
title What Is the Ability Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) Good for? An Evaluation Using Item Response Theory
title_full What Is the Ability Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) Good for? An Evaluation Using Item Response Theory
title_fullStr What Is the Ability Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) Good for? An Evaluation Using Item Response Theory
title_full_unstemmed What Is the Ability Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) Good for? An Evaluation Using Item Response Theory
title_short What Is the Ability Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) Good for? An Evaluation Using Item Response Theory
title_sort what is the ability emotional intelligence test (msceit) good for? an evaluation using item response theory
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4046984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24901541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098827
work_keys_str_mv AT fiorimarina whatistheabilityemotionalintelligencetestmsceitgoodforanevaluationusingitemresponsetheory
AT antoniettijeanphilippe whatistheabilityemotionalintelligencetestmsceitgoodforanevaluationusingitemresponsetheory
AT mikolajczakmoira whatistheabilityemotionalintelligencetestmsceitgoodforanevaluationusingitemresponsetheory
AT luminetolivier whatistheabilityemotionalintelligencetestmsceitgoodforanevaluationusingitemresponsetheory
AT hansennemichel whatistheabilityemotionalintelligencetestmsceitgoodforanevaluationusingitemresponsetheory
AT rossierjerome whatistheabilityemotionalintelligencetestmsceitgoodforanevaluationusingitemresponsetheory