Cargando…

DTI Analysis in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Impact of Registration on Voxel-Wise Statistics

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) has been used to assess the integrity of the visual pathway in glaucoma patients. TBSS uses the subjects’ FA data to create a mean FA skeleton of white matter tracts before running voxel-wise cross-subject statistics. We compared four dif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmidt, Manuel A., Mennecke, Angelika, Michelson, Georg, Doerfler, Arnd, Engelhorn, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4047109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24901535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099344
_version_ 1782480369558224896
author Schmidt, Manuel A.
Mennecke, Angelika
Michelson, Georg
Doerfler, Arnd
Engelhorn, Tobias
author_facet Schmidt, Manuel A.
Mennecke, Angelika
Michelson, Georg
Doerfler, Arnd
Engelhorn, Tobias
author_sort Schmidt, Manuel A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) has been used to assess the integrity of the visual pathway in glaucoma patients. TBSS uses the subjects’ FA data to create a mean FA skeleton of white matter tracts before running voxel-wise cross-subject statistics. We compared four different approaches of registration of FA maps to create the skeleton and evaluated alignment and subsequently the impact of the chosen registration on voxel-wise statistics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our study comprised 69 subjects, i.e. 46 patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and a healthy, age-matched control group of 23 subjects. Mean FA skeletons were created using the following registration approaches: registration to a standard template (T), registration to the group mean (GM), registration to a group-wise atlas (GW) and registration to the most typical subject (N). Subsequently, maps of standard deviation of the 4D images were created to assess the alignment. Voxel-wise statistics for each registration approach were performed. RESULTS: We found distinct differences in voxel-wise statistics depending on the chosen registration approach. Best alignment results were achieved by registration to a study specific template, i.e. to the group mean (GM) or to a group-wise atlas (GW). Overall alignment did not differ between these two approaches. However, voxel-wise statistics showed clusters of significantly decreased FA values in the T and GM approach, which were not significant after GW registration. These voxels of significantly decreased FA values after T and GM registration did not represent white matter tracts and correlated with higher standard deviation in FA maps across subjects, thus implying registration errors, especially in the optic radiation. CONCLUSION: Registration to a study-specific template, i.e. to the group mean or a group-wise atlas seems to be the method of choice in TBSS-analysis of glaucoma patients as it shows better alignment of the optic radiation and helps to rule out registration errors due to misalignment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4047109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40471092014-06-09 DTI Analysis in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Impact of Registration on Voxel-Wise Statistics Schmidt, Manuel A. Mennecke, Angelika Michelson, Georg Doerfler, Arnd Engelhorn, Tobias PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) has been used to assess the integrity of the visual pathway in glaucoma patients. TBSS uses the subjects’ FA data to create a mean FA skeleton of white matter tracts before running voxel-wise cross-subject statistics. We compared four different approaches of registration of FA maps to create the skeleton and evaluated alignment and subsequently the impact of the chosen registration on voxel-wise statistics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our study comprised 69 subjects, i.e. 46 patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and a healthy, age-matched control group of 23 subjects. Mean FA skeletons were created using the following registration approaches: registration to a standard template (T), registration to the group mean (GM), registration to a group-wise atlas (GW) and registration to the most typical subject (N). Subsequently, maps of standard deviation of the 4D images were created to assess the alignment. Voxel-wise statistics for each registration approach were performed. RESULTS: We found distinct differences in voxel-wise statistics depending on the chosen registration approach. Best alignment results were achieved by registration to a study specific template, i.e. to the group mean (GM) or to a group-wise atlas (GW). Overall alignment did not differ between these two approaches. However, voxel-wise statistics showed clusters of significantly decreased FA values in the T and GM approach, which were not significant after GW registration. These voxels of significantly decreased FA values after T and GM registration did not represent white matter tracts and correlated with higher standard deviation in FA maps across subjects, thus implying registration errors, especially in the optic radiation. CONCLUSION: Registration to a study-specific template, i.e. to the group mean or a group-wise atlas seems to be the method of choice in TBSS-analysis of glaucoma patients as it shows better alignment of the optic radiation and helps to rule out registration errors due to misalignment. Public Library of Science 2014-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4047109/ /pubmed/24901535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099344 Text en © 2014 Schmidt et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schmidt, Manuel A.
Mennecke, Angelika
Michelson, Georg
Doerfler, Arnd
Engelhorn, Tobias
DTI Analysis in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Impact of Registration on Voxel-Wise Statistics
title DTI Analysis in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Impact of Registration on Voxel-Wise Statistics
title_full DTI Analysis in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Impact of Registration on Voxel-Wise Statistics
title_fullStr DTI Analysis in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Impact of Registration on Voxel-Wise Statistics
title_full_unstemmed DTI Analysis in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Impact of Registration on Voxel-Wise Statistics
title_short DTI Analysis in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Impact of Registration on Voxel-Wise Statistics
title_sort dti analysis in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma: impact of registration on voxel-wise statistics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4047109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24901535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099344
work_keys_str_mv AT schmidtmanuela dtianalysisinpatientswithprimaryopenangleglaucomaimpactofregistrationonvoxelwisestatistics
AT menneckeangelika dtianalysisinpatientswithprimaryopenangleglaucomaimpactofregistrationonvoxelwisestatistics
AT michelsongeorg dtianalysisinpatientswithprimaryopenangleglaucomaimpactofregistrationonvoxelwisestatistics
AT doerflerarnd dtianalysisinpatientswithprimaryopenangleglaucomaimpactofregistrationonvoxelwisestatistics
AT engelhorntobias dtianalysisinpatientswithprimaryopenangleglaucomaimpactofregistrationonvoxelwisestatistics