Cargando…
DTI Analysis in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Impact of Registration on Voxel-Wise Statistics
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) has been used to assess the integrity of the visual pathway in glaucoma patients. TBSS uses the subjects’ FA data to create a mean FA skeleton of white matter tracts before running voxel-wise cross-subject statistics. We compared four dif...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4047109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24901535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099344 |
_version_ | 1782480369558224896 |
---|---|
author | Schmidt, Manuel A. Mennecke, Angelika Michelson, Georg Doerfler, Arnd Engelhorn, Tobias |
author_facet | Schmidt, Manuel A. Mennecke, Angelika Michelson, Georg Doerfler, Arnd Engelhorn, Tobias |
author_sort | Schmidt, Manuel A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) has been used to assess the integrity of the visual pathway in glaucoma patients. TBSS uses the subjects’ FA data to create a mean FA skeleton of white matter tracts before running voxel-wise cross-subject statistics. We compared four different approaches of registration of FA maps to create the skeleton and evaluated alignment and subsequently the impact of the chosen registration on voxel-wise statistics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our study comprised 69 subjects, i.e. 46 patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and a healthy, age-matched control group of 23 subjects. Mean FA skeletons were created using the following registration approaches: registration to a standard template (T), registration to the group mean (GM), registration to a group-wise atlas (GW) and registration to the most typical subject (N). Subsequently, maps of standard deviation of the 4D images were created to assess the alignment. Voxel-wise statistics for each registration approach were performed. RESULTS: We found distinct differences in voxel-wise statistics depending on the chosen registration approach. Best alignment results were achieved by registration to a study specific template, i.e. to the group mean (GM) or to a group-wise atlas (GW). Overall alignment did not differ between these two approaches. However, voxel-wise statistics showed clusters of significantly decreased FA values in the T and GM approach, which were not significant after GW registration. These voxels of significantly decreased FA values after T and GM registration did not represent white matter tracts and correlated with higher standard deviation in FA maps across subjects, thus implying registration errors, especially in the optic radiation. CONCLUSION: Registration to a study-specific template, i.e. to the group mean or a group-wise atlas seems to be the method of choice in TBSS-analysis of glaucoma patients as it shows better alignment of the optic radiation and helps to rule out registration errors due to misalignment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4047109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40471092014-06-09 DTI Analysis in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Impact of Registration on Voxel-Wise Statistics Schmidt, Manuel A. Mennecke, Angelika Michelson, Georg Doerfler, Arnd Engelhorn, Tobias PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) has been used to assess the integrity of the visual pathway in glaucoma patients. TBSS uses the subjects’ FA data to create a mean FA skeleton of white matter tracts before running voxel-wise cross-subject statistics. We compared four different approaches of registration of FA maps to create the skeleton and evaluated alignment and subsequently the impact of the chosen registration on voxel-wise statistics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our study comprised 69 subjects, i.e. 46 patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and a healthy, age-matched control group of 23 subjects. Mean FA skeletons were created using the following registration approaches: registration to a standard template (T), registration to the group mean (GM), registration to a group-wise atlas (GW) and registration to the most typical subject (N). Subsequently, maps of standard deviation of the 4D images were created to assess the alignment. Voxel-wise statistics for each registration approach were performed. RESULTS: We found distinct differences in voxel-wise statistics depending on the chosen registration approach. Best alignment results were achieved by registration to a study specific template, i.e. to the group mean (GM) or to a group-wise atlas (GW). Overall alignment did not differ between these two approaches. However, voxel-wise statistics showed clusters of significantly decreased FA values in the T and GM approach, which were not significant after GW registration. These voxels of significantly decreased FA values after T and GM registration did not represent white matter tracts and correlated with higher standard deviation in FA maps across subjects, thus implying registration errors, especially in the optic radiation. CONCLUSION: Registration to a study-specific template, i.e. to the group mean or a group-wise atlas seems to be the method of choice in TBSS-analysis of glaucoma patients as it shows better alignment of the optic radiation and helps to rule out registration errors due to misalignment. Public Library of Science 2014-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4047109/ /pubmed/24901535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099344 Text en © 2014 Schmidt et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schmidt, Manuel A. Mennecke, Angelika Michelson, Georg Doerfler, Arnd Engelhorn, Tobias DTI Analysis in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Impact of Registration on Voxel-Wise Statistics |
title | DTI Analysis in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Impact of Registration on Voxel-Wise Statistics |
title_full | DTI Analysis in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Impact of Registration on Voxel-Wise Statistics |
title_fullStr | DTI Analysis in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Impact of Registration on Voxel-Wise Statistics |
title_full_unstemmed | DTI Analysis in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Impact of Registration on Voxel-Wise Statistics |
title_short | DTI Analysis in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Impact of Registration on Voxel-Wise Statistics |
title_sort | dti analysis in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma: impact of registration on voxel-wise statistics |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4047109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24901535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099344 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schmidtmanuela dtianalysisinpatientswithprimaryopenangleglaucomaimpactofregistrationonvoxelwisestatistics AT menneckeangelika dtianalysisinpatientswithprimaryopenangleglaucomaimpactofregistrationonvoxelwisestatistics AT michelsongeorg dtianalysisinpatientswithprimaryopenangleglaucomaimpactofregistrationonvoxelwisestatistics AT doerflerarnd dtianalysisinpatientswithprimaryopenangleglaucomaimpactofregistrationonvoxelwisestatistics AT engelhorntobias dtianalysisinpatientswithprimaryopenangleglaucomaimpactofregistrationonvoxelwisestatistics |