Cargando…

Osteoclast Fusion is Based on Heterogeneity Between Fusion Partners

Bone-resorbing osteoclasts are formed through fusion of mononucleated precursors. Their choice of partners during the fusion process remains unclear. We hypothesized that osteoclasts are selective in their choice of fusion partner and that this selectivity is based on heterogeneity among the cells w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hobolt-Pedersen, Anne-Sofie, Delaissé, Jean-Marie, Søe, Kent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4048669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24862648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00223-014-9864-5
_version_ 1782480562382962688
author Hobolt-Pedersen, Anne-Sofie
Delaissé, Jean-Marie
Søe, Kent
author_facet Hobolt-Pedersen, Anne-Sofie
Delaissé, Jean-Marie
Søe, Kent
author_sort Hobolt-Pedersen, Anne-Sofie
collection PubMed
description Bone-resorbing osteoclasts are formed through fusion of mononucleated precursors. Their choice of partners during the fusion process remains unclear. We hypothesized that osteoclasts are selective in their choice of fusion partner and that this selectivity is based on heterogeneity among the cells with respect to their maturation stage and their expression and cellular organization of fusion factors. Support for this hypothesis was found from immunofluorescence staining of the osteoclast fusion factors CD47, dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein (DC-STAMP), and syncytin-1. These stainings revealed heterogeneous localization patterns of all three factors within a given culture of osteoclasts. CD47 was found to be localized primarily in small osteoclasts and preosteoclasts, which were also positive for DC-STAMP but negative for cathepsin K expression. A role of CD47 in the early osteoclast fusion steps was also suggested from experiments with a CD47 blocking antibody, which resulted in an inhibition of the fusion of small osteoclasts. Conversely, blocking of connexin 43 affected the fusion of larger osteoclasts with four or more nuclei. The suggestion that different fusion factors function at different stages of osteoclast fusion supports the idea of heterogeneity in the osteoclast population; our results suggest that osteoclast fusion is indeed based on heterogeneity. Considering the in vivo environment in which osteoclasts develop and fuse, our findings seem very applicable and provide novel, important insight into key issues in bone and fusion research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4048669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40486692014-06-16 Osteoclast Fusion is Based on Heterogeneity Between Fusion Partners Hobolt-Pedersen, Anne-Sofie Delaissé, Jean-Marie Søe, Kent Calcif Tissue Int Original Research Bone-resorbing osteoclasts are formed through fusion of mononucleated precursors. Their choice of partners during the fusion process remains unclear. We hypothesized that osteoclasts are selective in their choice of fusion partner and that this selectivity is based on heterogeneity among the cells with respect to their maturation stage and their expression and cellular organization of fusion factors. Support for this hypothesis was found from immunofluorescence staining of the osteoclast fusion factors CD47, dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein (DC-STAMP), and syncytin-1. These stainings revealed heterogeneous localization patterns of all three factors within a given culture of osteoclasts. CD47 was found to be localized primarily in small osteoclasts and preosteoclasts, which were also positive for DC-STAMP but negative for cathepsin K expression. A role of CD47 in the early osteoclast fusion steps was also suggested from experiments with a CD47 blocking antibody, which resulted in an inhibition of the fusion of small osteoclasts. Conversely, blocking of connexin 43 affected the fusion of larger osteoclasts with four or more nuclei. The suggestion that different fusion factors function at different stages of osteoclast fusion supports the idea of heterogeneity in the osteoclast population; our results suggest that osteoclast fusion is indeed based on heterogeneity. Considering the in vivo environment in which osteoclasts develop and fuse, our findings seem very applicable and provide novel, important insight into key issues in bone and fusion research. Springer US 2014-05-27 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4048669/ /pubmed/24862648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00223-014-9864-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hobolt-Pedersen, Anne-Sofie
Delaissé, Jean-Marie
Søe, Kent
Osteoclast Fusion is Based on Heterogeneity Between Fusion Partners
title Osteoclast Fusion is Based on Heterogeneity Between Fusion Partners
title_full Osteoclast Fusion is Based on Heterogeneity Between Fusion Partners
title_fullStr Osteoclast Fusion is Based on Heterogeneity Between Fusion Partners
title_full_unstemmed Osteoclast Fusion is Based on Heterogeneity Between Fusion Partners
title_short Osteoclast Fusion is Based on Heterogeneity Between Fusion Partners
title_sort osteoclast fusion is based on heterogeneity between fusion partners
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4048669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24862648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00223-014-9864-5
work_keys_str_mv AT hoboltpedersenannesofie osteoclastfusionisbasedonheterogeneitybetweenfusionpartners
AT delaissejeanmarie osteoclastfusionisbasedonheterogeneitybetweenfusionpartners
AT søekent osteoclastfusionisbasedonheterogeneitybetweenfusionpartners