Cargando…

Assessment of a quantitative metric for 4D CT artifact evaluation by observer consensus

The benefits of four‐dimensional computed tomography (4D CT) are limited by the presence of artifacts that remain difficult to quantify. A correlation‐based metric previously proposed for ciné 4D CT artifact identification was further validated as an independent artifact evaluator by using a novel q...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castillo, Sarah J., Castillo, Richard, Balter, Peter, Pan, Tinsu, Ibbott, Geoffrey, Hobbs, Brian, Yuan, Ying, Guerrero, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4048877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24892346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i3.4718
_version_ 1782480573242015744
author Castillo, Sarah J.
Castillo, Richard
Balter, Peter
Pan, Tinsu
Ibbott, Geoffrey
Hobbs, Brian
Yuan, Ying
Guerrero, Thomas
author_facet Castillo, Sarah J.
Castillo, Richard
Balter, Peter
Pan, Tinsu
Ibbott, Geoffrey
Hobbs, Brian
Yuan, Ying
Guerrero, Thomas
author_sort Castillo, Sarah J.
collection PubMed
description The benefits of four‐dimensional computed tomography (4D CT) are limited by the presence of artifacts that remain difficult to quantify. A correlation‐based metric previously proposed for ciné 4D CT artifact identification was further validated as an independent artifact evaluator by using a novel qualitative assessment featuring a group of observers reaching a consensus decision on artifact location and magnitude. The consensus group evaluated ten ciné 4D CT scans for artifacts over each breathing phase of coronal lung views assuming one artifact per couch location. Each artifact was assigned a magnitude score of 1‐5, 1 indicating lowest severity and 5 indicating highest severity. Consensus group results served as the ground truth for assessment of the correlation metric. The ten patients were split into two cohorts; cohort 1 generated an artifact identification threshold derived from receiver operating characteristic analysis using the Youden Index, while cohort 2 generated sensitivity and specificity values from application of the artifact threshold. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated between the correlation metric values and the consensus group scores for both cohorts. The average sensitivity and specificity values found with application of the artifact threshold were 0.703 and 0.476, respectively. The correlation coefficients of artifact magnitudes for cohort 1 and 2 were 0.80 and 0.61, respectively, (p < 0.001 for both); these correlation coefficients included a few scans with only two of the five possible magnitude scores. Artifact incidence was associated with breathing phase (p < 0.002), with presentation less likely near maximum exhale. Overall, the correlation metric allowed accurate and automated artifact identification. The consensus group evaluation resulted in efficient qualitative scoring, reduced interobserver variation, and provided consistent identification of artifact location and magnitudes. PACS numbers: 87.57.qp, 87.55.Gh, 87.57.C‐
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4048877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40488772018-04-02 Assessment of a quantitative metric for 4D CT artifact evaluation by observer consensus Castillo, Sarah J. Castillo, Richard Balter, Peter Pan, Tinsu Ibbott, Geoffrey Hobbs, Brian Yuan, Ying Guerrero, Thomas J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The benefits of four‐dimensional computed tomography (4D CT) are limited by the presence of artifacts that remain difficult to quantify. A correlation‐based metric previously proposed for ciné 4D CT artifact identification was further validated as an independent artifact evaluator by using a novel qualitative assessment featuring a group of observers reaching a consensus decision on artifact location and magnitude. The consensus group evaluated ten ciné 4D CT scans for artifacts over each breathing phase of coronal lung views assuming one artifact per couch location. Each artifact was assigned a magnitude score of 1‐5, 1 indicating lowest severity and 5 indicating highest severity. Consensus group results served as the ground truth for assessment of the correlation metric. The ten patients were split into two cohorts; cohort 1 generated an artifact identification threshold derived from receiver operating characteristic analysis using the Youden Index, while cohort 2 generated sensitivity and specificity values from application of the artifact threshold. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated between the correlation metric values and the consensus group scores for both cohorts. The average sensitivity and specificity values found with application of the artifact threshold were 0.703 and 0.476, respectively. The correlation coefficients of artifact magnitudes for cohort 1 and 2 were 0.80 and 0.61, respectively, (p < 0.001 for both); these correlation coefficients included a few scans with only two of the five possible magnitude scores. Artifact incidence was associated with breathing phase (p < 0.002), with presentation less likely near maximum exhale. Overall, the correlation metric allowed accurate and automated artifact identification. The consensus group evaluation resulted in efficient qualitative scoring, reduced interobserver variation, and provided consistent identification of artifact location and magnitudes. PACS numbers: 87.57.qp, 87.55.Gh, 87.57.C‐ John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4048877/ /pubmed/24892346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i3.4718 Text en © 2014 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Castillo, Sarah J.
Castillo, Richard
Balter, Peter
Pan, Tinsu
Ibbott, Geoffrey
Hobbs, Brian
Yuan, Ying
Guerrero, Thomas
Assessment of a quantitative metric for 4D CT artifact evaluation by observer consensus
title Assessment of a quantitative metric for 4D CT artifact evaluation by observer consensus
title_full Assessment of a quantitative metric for 4D CT artifact evaluation by observer consensus
title_fullStr Assessment of a quantitative metric for 4D CT artifact evaluation by observer consensus
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of a quantitative metric for 4D CT artifact evaluation by observer consensus
title_short Assessment of a quantitative metric for 4D CT artifact evaluation by observer consensus
title_sort assessment of a quantitative metric for 4d ct artifact evaluation by observer consensus
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4048877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24892346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i3.4718
work_keys_str_mv AT castillosarahj assessmentofaquantitativemetricfor4dctartifactevaluationbyobserverconsensus
AT castillorichard assessmentofaquantitativemetricfor4dctartifactevaluationbyobserverconsensus
AT balterpeter assessmentofaquantitativemetricfor4dctartifactevaluationbyobserverconsensus
AT pantinsu assessmentofaquantitativemetricfor4dctartifactevaluationbyobserverconsensus
AT ibbottgeoffrey assessmentofaquantitativemetricfor4dctartifactevaluationbyobserverconsensus
AT hobbsbrian assessmentofaquantitativemetricfor4dctartifactevaluationbyobserverconsensus
AT yuanying assessmentofaquantitativemetricfor4dctartifactevaluationbyobserverconsensus
AT guerrerothomas assessmentofaquantitativemetricfor4dctartifactevaluationbyobserverconsensus