Cargando…

Comparison of single coracoclavicular suture fixation and hook plate for the treatment of acute unstable distal clavicle fractures

BACKGROUND: Surgical managements are recommended for unstable distal clavicle fractures because of a high incidence of nonunion. A variety of methods have been previously reported, but there is no current consensus regarding which method is the most suitable. METHODS: Between December 2004 and Augus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Chun-Yu, Yang, Shan-Wei, Lin, Kuan-Yu, Lin, Kai-Cheng, Tarng, Yih-Wen, Renn, Jenn-Huei, Lai, Chia-Hsin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4049442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-9-42
_version_ 1782319814853787648
author Chen, Chun-Yu
Yang, Shan-Wei
Lin, Kuan-Yu
Lin, Kai-Cheng
Tarng, Yih-Wen
Renn, Jenn-Huei
Lai, Chia-Hsin
author_facet Chen, Chun-Yu
Yang, Shan-Wei
Lin, Kuan-Yu
Lin, Kai-Cheng
Tarng, Yih-Wen
Renn, Jenn-Huei
Lai, Chia-Hsin
author_sort Chen, Chun-Yu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical managements are recommended for unstable distal clavicle fractures because of a high incidence of nonunion. A variety of methods have been previously reported, but there is no current consensus regarding which method is the most suitable. METHODS: Between December 2004 and August 2010, we treated 68 patients with Neer type IIB distal clavicle fractures using single coracoclavicular suture fixation with Mersilene tape (M group) or clavicular hook plate (H group). Sixty-eight patients were followed at least 24 months (mean, 37.9 months). We retrospectively compared the functional outcome, parameters, and perioperative course of the two treatments. Statistical analysis was performed with independent sample t test and chi-square test. RESULTS: The M group presented significantly less operation time (P = 0.005) and intra-operative blood loss (P = 0.010) than the H group. The mean University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder rating scale, Oxford shoulder score, VAS scale, and satisfaction score revealed no significant difference between the M group and the H group. The M group had better range of motion in the operated shoulder during forward flexion and abduction at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. However, the range of motion at 1 and 2 years after operation revealed almost the same results. Two acromial osteolysis and one acromial fracture were noted in the H group and one superficial wound infection and one frozen shoulder in the M group during follow-up. Finally, there was no significant difference in the complication rate between the two groups, and all fractures achieved union clinically at final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Both single coracoclavicular suture fixation and clavicular hook plate offered effective treatment in acute unstable distal clavicle fractures. However, single coracoclavicular suture fixation with Mersilene tape provided early recovery of shoulder motion and avoided further morbidity of the acromion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4049442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40494422014-06-10 Comparison of single coracoclavicular suture fixation and hook plate for the treatment of acute unstable distal clavicle fractures Chen, Chun-Yu Yang, Shan-Wei Lin, Kuan-Yu Lin, Kai-Cheng Tarng, Yih-Wen Renn, Jenn-Huei Lai, Chia-Hsin J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Surgical managements are recommended for unstable distal clavicle fractures because of a high incidence of nonunion. A variety of methods have been previously reported, but there is no current consensus regarding which method is the most suitable. METHODS: Between December 2004 and August 2010, we treated 68 patients with Neer type IIB distal clavicle fractures using single coracoclavicular suture fixation with Mersilene tape (M group) or clavicular hook plate (H group). Sixty-eight patients were followed at least 24 months (mean, 37.9 months). We retrospectively compared the functional outcome, parameters, and perioperative course of the two treatments. Statistical analysis was performed with independent sample t test and chi-square test. RESULTS: The M group presented significantly less operation time (P = 0.005) and intra-operative blood loss (P = 0.010) than the H group. The mean University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder rating scale, Oxford shoulder score, VAS scale, and satisfaction score revealed no significant difference between the M group and the H group. The M group had better range of motion in the operated shoulder during forward flexion and abduction at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. However, the range of motion at 1 and 2 years after operation revealed almost the same results. Two acromial osteolysis and one acromial fracture were noted in the H group and one superficial wound infection and one frozen shoulder in the M group during follow-up. Finally, there was no significant difference in the complication rate between the two groups, and all fractures achieved union clinically at final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Both single coracoclavicular suture fixation and clavicular hook plate offered effective treatment in acute unstable distal clavicle fractures. However, single coracoclavicular suture fixation with Mersilene tape provided early recovery of shoulder motion and avoided further morbidity of the acromion. BioMed Central 2014-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4049442/ /pubmed/24885387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-9-42 Text en Copyright © 2014 Chen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Chun-Yu
Yang, Shan-Wei
Lin, Kuan-Yu
Lin, Kai-Cheng
Tarng, Yih-Wen
Renn, Jenn-Huei
Lai, Chia-Hsin
Comparison of single coracoclavicular suture fixation and hook plate for the treatment of acute unstable distal clavicle fractures
title Comparison of single coracoclavicular suture fixation and hook plate for the treatment of acute unstable distal clavicle fractures
title_full Comparison of single coracoclavicular suture fixation and hook plate for the treatment of acute unstable distal clavicle fractures
title_fullStr Comparison of single coracoclavicular suture fixation and hook plate for the treatment of acute unstable distal clavicle fractures
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of single coracoclavicular suture fixation and hook plate for the treatment of acute unstable distal clavicle fractures
title_short Comparison of single coracoclavicular suture fixation and hook plate for the treatment of acute unstable distal clavicle fractures
title_sort comparison of single coracoclavicular suture fixation and hook plate for the treatment of acute unstable distal clavicle fractures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4049442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-9-42
work_keys_str_mv AT chenchunyu comparisonofsinglecoracoclavicularsuturefixationandhookplateforthetreatmentofacuteunstabledistalclaviclefractures
AT yangshanwei comparisonofsinglecoracoclavicularsuturefixationandhookplateforthetreatmentofacuteunstabledistalclaviclefractures
AT linkuanyu comparisonofsinglecoracoclavicularsuturefixationandhookplateforthetreatmentofacuteunstabledistalclaviclefractures
AT linkaicheng comparisonofsinglecoracoclavicularsuturefixationandhookplateforthetreatmentofacuteunstabledistalclaviclefractures
AT tarngyihwen comparisonofsinglecoracoclavicularsuturefixationandhookplateforthetreatmentofacuteunstabledistalclaviclefractures
AT rennjennhuei comparisonofsinglecoracoclavicularsuturefixationandhookplateforthetreatmentofacuteunstabledistalclaviclefractures
AT laichiahsin comparisonofsinglecoracoclavicularsuturefixationandhookplateforthetreatmentofacuteunstabledistalclaviclefractures