Cargando…
Finite element analysis of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy
BACKGROUND: The biomechanical property of MGT for patients who underwent partial sacrectomy is not well documented, so this study aimed to investigate biomechanical property of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy. MATERIAL/METHODS: Three 3-dimensional finite element models of lumbosa...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4049974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24874025 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.890134 |
_version_ | 1782319893988769792 |
---|---|
author | Zheng, Longpo Li, Ziqiang Li, Quan Ji, Fang Cai, Zhengdong |
author_facet | Zheng, Longpo Li, Ziqiang Li, Quan Ji, Fang Cai, Zhengdong |
author_sort | Zheng, Longpo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The biomechanical property of MGT for patients who underwent partial sacrectomy is not well documented, so this study aimed to investigate biomechanical property of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy. MATERIAL/METHODS: Three 3-dimensional finite element models of lumbosacral region were established: 1) an intact model (INT), 2) a defective model in which partial sacrectomy was performed cephalad to S1 foramina (DEF), and 3) a reconstructed model (REC). RESULTS: Displacements of anchor point on L3 vertebrae in INT, DEF, and REC model were 6.63 mm, 10.62 mm, 4.29 mm (titanium), and 3.86mm (stainless steel), respectively. Stress distribution of the instrument in REC model showed excessive concentration on the caudal spinal rod, which may cause rod failure between spine and ilia. Maximum von Mise stress of the stainless steel instrument was higher than titanium instruments, and values of stress of the anchor point around the sacroiliac joint in the REC model were 26.4MPa with titanium instruments and 23.9 MPa with stainless steel instruments. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbosacral reconstruction can significantly increase stiffness of the spinopelvis of patients who underwent partial sacrectomy. However, the rod between L5 and ilia is the weakest region of all instruments. Stainless steel instruments have higher risk of rod failure and are less suitable for lumboiliac arthrodesis than titanium instruments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4049974 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | International Scientific Literature, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40499742014-06-10 Finite element analysis of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy Zheng, Longpo Li, Ziqiang Li, Quan Ji, Fang Cai, Zhengdong Med Sci Monit Product Investigations BACKGROUND: The biomechanical property of MGT for patients who underwent partial sacrectomy is not well documented, so this study aimed to investigate biomechanical property of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy. MATERIAL/METHODS: Three 3-dimensional finite element models of lumbosacral region were established: 1) an intact model (INT), 2) a defective model in which partial sacrectomy was performed cephalad to S1 foramina (DEF), and 3) a reconstructed model (REC). RESULTS: Displacements of anchor point on L3 vertebrae in INT, DEF, and REC model were 6.63 mm, 10.62 mm, 4.29 mm (titanium), and 3.86mm (stainless steel), respectively. Stress distribution of the instrument in REC model showed excessive concentration on the caudal spinal rod, which may cause rod failure between spine and ilia. Maximum von Mise stress of the stainless steel instrument was higher than titanium instruments, and values of stress of the anchor point around the sacroiliac joint in the REC model were 26.4MPa with titanium instruments and 23.9 MPa with stainless steel instruments. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbosacral reconstruction can significantly increase stiffness of the spinopelvis of patients who underwent partial sacrectomy. However, the rod between L5 and ilia is the weakest region of all instruments. Stainless steel instruments have higher risk of rod failure and are less suitable for lumboiliac arthrodesis than titanium instruments. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2014-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4049974/ /pubmed/24874025 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.890134 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2014 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License |
spellingShingle | Product Investigations Zheng, Longpo Li, Ziqiang Li, Quan Ji, Fang Cai, Zhengdong Finite element analysis of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy |
title | Finite element analysis of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy |
title_full | Finite element analysis of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy |
title_fullStr | Finite element analysis of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Finite element analysis of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy |
title_short | Finite element analysis of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy |
title_sort | finite element analysis of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy |
topic | Product Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4049974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24874025 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.890134 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhenglongpo finiteelementanalysisoflumbosacralreconstructionafterpartialsacrectomy AT liziqiang finiteelementanalysisoflumbosacralreconstructionafterpartialsacrectomy AT liquan finiteelementanalysisoflumbosacralreconstructionafterpartialsacrectomy AT jifang finiteelementanalysisoflumbosacralreconstructionafterpartialsacrectomy AT caizhengdong finiteelementanalysisoflumbosacralreconstructionafterpartialsacrectomy |