Cargando…

Finite element analysis of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy

BACKGROUND: The biomechanical property of MGT for patients who underwent partial sacrectomy is not well documented, so this study aimed to investigate biomechanical property of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy. MATERIAL/METHODS: Three 3-dimensional finite element models of lumbosa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Longpo, Li, Ziqiang, Li, Quan, Ji, Fang, Cai, Zhengdong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4049974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24874025
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.890134
_version_ 1782319893988769792
author Zheng, Longpo
Li, Ziqiang
Li, Quan
Ji, Fang
Cai, Zhengdong
author_facet Zheng, Longpo
Li, Ziqiang
Li, Quan
Ji, Fang
Cai, Zhengdong
author_sort Zheng, Longpo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The biomechanical property of MGT for patients who underwent partial sacrectomy is not well documented, so this study aimed to investigate biomechanical property of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy. MATERIAL/METHODS: Three 3-dimensional finite element models of lumbosacral region were established: 1) an intact model (INT), 2) a defective model in which partial sacrectomy was performed cephalad to S1 foramina (DEF), and 3) a reconstructed model (REC). RESULTS: Displacements of anchor point on L3 vertebrae in INT, DEF, and REC model were 6.63 mm, 10.62 mm, 4.29 mm (titanium), and 3.86mm (stainless steel), respectively. Stress distribution of the instrument in REC model showed excessive concentration on the caudal spinal rod, which may cause rod failure between spine and ilia. Maximum von Mise stress of the stainless steel instrument was higher than titanium instruments, and values of stress of the anchor point around the sacroiliac joint in the REC model were 26.4MPa with titanium instruments and 23.9 MPa with stainless steel instruments. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbosacral reconstruction can significantly increase stiffness of the spinopelvis of patients who underwent partial sacrectomy. However, the rod between L5 and ilia is the weakest region of all instruments. Stainless steel instruments have higher risk of rod failure and are less suitable for lumboiliac arthrodesis than titanium instruments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4049974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40499742014-06-10 Finite element analysis of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy Zheng, Longpo Li, Ziqiang Li, Quan Ji, Fang Cai, Zhengdong Med Sci Monit Product Investigations BACKGROUND: The biomechanical property of MGT for patients who underwent partial sacrectomy is not well documented, so this study aimed to investigate biomechanical property of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy. MATERIAL/METHODS: Three 3-dimensional finite element models of lumbosacral region were established: 1) an intact model (INT), 2) a defective model in which partial sacrectomy was performed cephalad to S1 foramina (DEF), and 3) a reconstructed model (REC). RESULTS: Displacements of anchor point on L3 vertebrae in INT, DEF, and REC model were 6.63 mm, 10.62 mm, 4.29 mm (titanium), and 3.86mm (stainless steel), respectively. Stress distribution of the instrument in REC model showed excessive concentration on the caudal spinal rod, which may cause rod failure between spine and ilia. Maximum von Mise stress of the stainless steel instrument was higher than titanium instruments, and values of stress of the anchor point around the sacroiliac joint in the REC model were 26.4MPa with titanium instruments and 23.9 MPa with stainless steel instruments. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbosacral reconstruction can significantly increase stiffness of the spinopelvis of patients who underwent partial sacrectomy. However, the rod between L5 and ilia is the weakest region of all instruments. Stainless steel instruments have higher risk of rod failure and are less suitable for lumboiliac arthrodesis than titanium instruments. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2014-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4049974/ /pubmed/24874025 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.890134 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2014 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License
spellingShingle Product Investigations
Zheng, Longpo
Li, Ziqiang
Li, Quan
Ji, Fang
Cai, Zhengdong
Finite element analysis of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy
title Finite element analysis of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy
title_full Finite element analysis of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy
title_fullStr Finite element analysis of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy
title_full_unstemmed Finite element analysis of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy
title_short Finite element analysis of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy
title_sort finite element analysis of lumbosacral reconstruction after partial sacrectomy
topic Product Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4049974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24874025
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.890134
work_keys_str_mv AT zhenglongpo finiteelementanalysisoflumbosacralreconstructionafterpartialsacrectomy
AT liziqiang finiteelementanalysisoflumbosacralreconstructionafterpartialsacrectomy
AT liquan finiteelementanalysisoflumbosacralreconstructionafterpartialsacrectomy
AT jifang finiteelementanalysisoflumbosacralreconstructionafterpartialsacrectomy
AT caizhengdong finiteelementanalysisoflumbosacralreconstructionafterpartialsacrectomy