Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of subclavian vein catheterisation using supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Infraclavicular (IC) approach of subclavian vein (SCV) catheterisation is widely used as compared to supraclavicular (SC) approach. The aim of the study was to compare the ease of catheterisation of SCV using SC versus IC approach and also record the incidence of complications r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4050932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24963180 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.130818 |
_version_ | 1782320024716836864 |
---|---|
author | Thakur, Anil Kaur, Kiranpreet Lamba, Aditya Taxak, Susheela Dureja, Jagdish Singhal, Suresh Bhardwaj, Mamta |
author_facet | Thakur, Anil Kaur, Kiranpreet Lamba, Aditya Taxak, Susheela Dureja, Jagdish Singhal, Suresh Bhardwaj, Mamta |
author_sort | Thakur, Anil |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Infraclavicular (IC) approach of subclavian vein (SCV) catheterisation is widely used as compared to supraclavicular (SC) approach. The aim of the study was to compare the ease of catheterisation of SCV using SC versus IC approach and also record the incidence of complications related to either approach, if any. METHODS: In the study, 60 patients enrolled were randomly divided into two groups of 30 patients each. In Gp. SC right SCV catheterisation was performed using SC approach and in Gp. IC catheterisation was performed using IC approach. Access time, success rate of cannulation, number of attempts to cannulate vein, ease of guidewire and catheter insertion and length of catheter inserted and any associated complications were recorded. RESULTS: The mean access time in group SC for SCV catheterisation was 4.30 ± 1.02 min compared to 6.07 ± 2.14 min in group IC. The overall success rate in catheterisation of the right SCV using SC approach (29 out of 30) was better as compared with group IC (27 out of 30) using IC approach. First attempt success in the SC group was 75.6% as compared with 59.25% in the IC group. All successful subclavian vein catheterisations in SC group and IC group were associated with smooth insertion of guidewire following subclavian venipuncture. CONCLUSION: The SC approach of SCV catheterisation is comparable to IC approach in terms of landmarks accessibility, success rate and rate of complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4050932 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40509322014-06-24 Comparative evaluation of subclavian vein catheterisation using supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach Thakur, Anil Kaur, Kiranpreet Lamba, Aditya Taxak, Susheela Dureja, Jagdish Singhal, Suresh Bhardwaj, Mamta Indian J Anaesth Clinical Investigation BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Infraclavicular (IC) approach of subclavian vein (SCV) catheterisation is widely used as compared to supraclavicular (SC) approach. The aim of the study was to compare the ease of catheterisation of SCV using SC versus IC approach and also record the incidence of complications related to either approach, if any. METHODS: In the study, 60 patients enrolled were randomly divided into two groups of 30 patients each. In Gp. SC right SCV catheterisation was performed using SC approach and in Gp. IC catheterisation was performed using IC approach. Access time, success rate of cannulation, number of attempts to cannulate vein, ease of guidewire and catheter insertion and length of catheter inserted and any associated complications were recorded. RESULTS: The mean access time in group SC for SCV catheterisation was 4.30 ± 1.02 min compared to 6.07 ± 2.14 min in group IC. The overall success rate in catheterisation of the right SCV using SC approach (29 out of 30) was better as compared with group IC (27 out of 30) using IC approach. First attempt success in the SC group was 75.6% as compared with 59.25% in the IC group. All successful subclavian vein catheterisations in SC group and IC group were associated with smooth insertion of guidewire following subclavian venipuncture. CONCLUSION: The SC approach of SCV catheterisation is comparable to IC approach in terms of landmarks accessibility, success rate and rate of complications. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4050932/ /pubmed/24963180 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.130818 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigation Thakur, Anil Kaur, Kiranpreet Lamba, Aditya Taxak, Susheela Dureja, Jagdish Singhal, Suresh Bhardwaj, Mamta Comparative evaluation of subclavian vein catheterisation using supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach |
title | Comparative evaluation of subclavian vein catheterisation using supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of subclavian vein catheterisation using supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of subclavian vein catheterisation using supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of subclavian vein catheterisation using supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of subclavian vein catheterisation using supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of subclavian vein catheterisation using supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach |
topic | Clinical Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4050932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24963180 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.130818 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thakuranil comparativeevaluationofsubclavianveincatheterisationusingsupraclavicularversusinfraclavicularapproach AT kaurkiranpreet comparativeevaluationofsubclavianveincatheterisationusingsupraclavicularversusinfraclavicularapproach AT lambaaditya comparativeevaluationofsubclavianveincatheterisationusingsupraclavicularversusinfraclavicularapproach AT taxaksusheela comparativeevaluationofsubclavianveincatheterisationusingsupraclavicularversusinfraclavicularapproach AT durejajagdish comparativeevaluationofsubclavianveincatheterisationusingsupraclavicularversusinfraclavicularapproach AT singhalsuresh comparativeevaluationofsubclavianveincatheterisationusingsupraclavicularversusinfraclavicularapproach AT bhardwajmamta comparativeevaluationofsubclavianveincatheterisationusingsupraclavicularversusinfraclavicularapproach |