Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of subclavian vein catheterisation using supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Infraclavicular (IC) approach of subclavian vein (SCV) catheterisation is widely used as compared to supraclavicular (SC) approach. The aim of the study was to compare the ease of catheterisation of SCV using SC versus IC approach and also record the incidence of complications r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thakur, Anil, Kaur, Kiranpreet, Lamba, Aditya, Taxak, Susheela, Dureja, Jagdish, Singhal, Suresh, Bhardwaj, Mamta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4050932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24963180
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.130818
_version_ 1782320024716836864
author Thakur, Anil
Kaur, Kiranpreet
Lamba, Aditya
Taxak, Susheela
Dureja, Jagdish
Singhal, Suresh
Bhardwaj, Mamta
author_facet Thakur, Anil
Kaur, Kiranpreet
Lamba, Aditya
Taxak, Susheela
Dureja, Jagdish
Singhal, Suresh
Bhardwaj, Mamta
author_sort Thakur, Anil
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Infraclavicular (IC) approach of subclavian vein (SCV) catheterisation is widely used as compared to supraclavicular (SC) approach. The aim of the study was to compare the ease of catheterisation of SCV using SC versus IC approach and also record the incidence of complications related to either approach, if any. METHODS: In the study, 60 patients enrolled were randomly divided into two groups of 30 patients each. In Gp. SC right SCV catheterisation was performed using SC approach and in Gp. IC catheterisation was performed using IC approach. Access time, success rate of cannulation, number of attempts to cannulate vein, ease of guidewire and catheter insertion and length of catheter inserted and any associated complications were recorded. RESULTS: The mean access time in group SC for SCV catheterisation was 4.30 ± 1.02 min compared to 6.07 ± 2.14 min in group IC. The overall success rate in catheterisation of the right SCV using SC approach (29 out of 30) was better as compared with group IC (27 out of 30) using IC approach. First attempt success in the SC group was 75.6% as compared with 59.25% in the IC group. All successful subclavian vein  catheterisations in SC group and IC group were associated with smooth insertion of guidewire following subclavian venipuncture. CONCLUSION: The SC approach of SCV catheterisation is comparable to IC approach in terms of landmarks accessibility, success rate and rate of complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4050932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40509322014-06-24 Comparative evaluation of subclavian vein catheterisation using supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach Thakur, Anil Kaur, Kiranpreet Lamba, Aditya Taxak, Susheela Dureja, Jagdish Singhal, Suresh Bhardwaj, Mamta Indian J Anaesth Clinical Investigation BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Infraclavicular (IC) approach of subclavian vein (SCV) catheterisation is widely used as compared to supraclavicular (SC) approach. The aim of the study was to compare the ease of catheterisation of SCV using SC versus IC approach and also record the incidence of complications related to either approach, if any. METHODS: In the study, 60 patients enrolled were randomly divided into two groups of 30 patients each. In Gp. SC right SCV catheterisation was performed using SC approach and in Gp. IC catheterisation was performed using IC approach. Access time, success rate of cannulation, number of attempts to cannulate vein, ease of guidewire and catheter insertion and length of catheter inserted and any associated complications were recorded. RESULTS: The mean access time in group SC for SCV catheterisation was 4.30 ± 1.02 min compared to 6.07 ± 2.14 min in group IC. The overall success rate in catheterisation of the right SCV using SC approach (29 out of 30) was better as compared with group IC (27 out of 30) using IC approach. First attempt success in the SC group was 75.6% as compared with 59.25% in the IC group. All successful subclavian vein  catheterisations in SC group and IC group were associated with smooth insertion of guidewire following subclavian venipuncture. CONCLUSION: The SC approach of SCV catheterisation is comparable to IC approach in terms of landmarks accessibility, success rate and rate of complications. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4050932/ /pubmed/24963180 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.130818 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Thakur, Anil
Kaur, Kiranpreet
Lamba, Aditya
Taxak, Susheela
Dureja, Jagdish
Singhal, Suresh
Bhardwaj, Mamta
Comparative evaluation of subclavian vein catheterisation using supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach
title Comparative evaluation of subclavian vein catheterisation using supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach
title_full Comparative evaluation of subclavian vein catheterisation using supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of subclavian vein catheterisation using supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of subclavian vein catheterisation using supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach
title_short Comparative evaluation of subclavian vein catheterisation using supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach
title_sort comparative evaluation of subclavian vein catheterisation using supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4050932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24963180
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.130818
work_keys_str_mv AT thakuranil comparativeevaluationofsubclavianveincatheterisationusingsupraclavicularversusinfraclavicularapproach
AT kaurkiranpreet comparativeevaluationofsubclavianveincatheterisationusingsupraclavicularversusinfraclavicularapproach
AT lambaaditya comparativeevaluationofsubclavianveincatheterisationusingsupraclavicularversusinfraclavicularapproach
AT taxaksusheela comparativeevaluationofsubclavianveincatheterisationusingsupraclavicularversusinfraclavicularapproach
AT durejajagdish comparativeevaluationofsubclavianveincatheterisationusingsupraclavicularversusinfraclavicularapproach
AT singhalsuresh comparativeevaluationofsubclavianveincatheterisationusingsupraclavicularversusinfraclavicularapproach
AT bhardwajmamta comparativeevaluationofsubclavianveincatheterisationusingsupraclavicularversusinfraclavicularapproach