Cargando…
Does time ever fly or slow down? The difficult interpretation of psychophysical data on time perception
Time perception is studied with subjective or semi-objective psychophysical methods. With subjective methods, observers provide quantitative estimates of duration and data depict the psychophysical function relating subjective duration to objective duration. With semi-objective methods, observers pr...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4051264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24959133 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00415 |
_version_ | 1782320083309166592 |
---|---|
author | García-Pérez, Miguel A. |
author_facet | García-Pérez, Miguel A. |
author_sort | García-Pérez, Miguel A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Time perception is studied with subjective or semi-objective psychophysical methods. With subjective methods, observers provide quantitative estimates of duration and data depict the psychophysical function relating subjective duration to objective duration. With semi-objective methods, observers provide categorical or comparative judgments of duration and data depict the psychometric function relating the probability of a certain judgment to objective duration. Both approaches are used to study whether subjective and objective time run at the same pace or whether time flies or slows down under certain conditions. We analyze theoretical aspects affecting the interpretation of data gathered with the most widely used semi-objective methods, including single-presentation and paired-comparison methods. For this purpose, a formal model of psychophysical performance is used in which subjective duration is represented via a psychophysical function and the scalar property. This provides the timing component of the model, which is invariant across methods. A decisional component that varies across methods reflects how observers use subjective durations to make judgments and give the responses requested under each method. Application of the model shows that psychometric functions in single-presentation methods are uninterpretable because the various influences on observed performance are inextricably confounded in the data. In contrast, data gathered with paired-comparison methods permit separating out those influences. Prevalent approaches to fitting psychometric functions to data are also discussed and shown to be inconsistent with widely accepted principles of time perception, implicitly assuming instead that subjective time equals objective time and that observed differences across conditions do not reflect differences in perceived duration but criterion shifts. These analyses prompt evidence-based recommendations for best methodological practice in studies on time perception. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4051264 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40512642014-06-23 Does time ever fly or slow down? The difficult interpretation of psychophysical data on time perception García-Pérez, Miguel A. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Time perception is studied with subjective or semi-objective psychophysical methods. With subjective methods, observers provide quantitative estimates of duration and data depict the psychophysical function relating subjective duration to objective duration. With semi-objective methods, observers provide categorical or comparative judgments of duration and data depict the psychometric function relating the probability of a certain judgment to objective duration. Both approaches are used to study whether subjective and objective time run at the same pace or whether time flies or slows down under certain conditions. We analyze theoretical aspects affecting the interpretation of data gathered with the most widely used semi-objective methods, including single-presentation and paired-comparison methods. For this purpose, a formal model of psychophysical performance is used in which subjective duration is represented via a psychophysical function and the scalar property. This provides the timing component of the model, which is invariant across methods. A decisional component that varies across methods reflects how observers use subjective durations to make judgments and give the responses requested under each method. Application of the model shows that psychometric functions in single-presentation methods are uninterpretable because the various influences on observed performance are inextricably confounded in the data. In contrast, data gathered with paired-comparison methods permit separating out those influences. Prevalent approaches to fitting psychometric functions to data are also discussed and shown to be inconsistent with widely accepted principles of time perception, implicitly assuming instead that subjective time equals objective time and that observed differences across conditions do not reflect differences in perceived duration but criterion shifts. These analyses prompt evidence-based recommendations for best methodological practice in studies on time perception. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4051264/ /pubmed/24959133 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00415 Text en Copyright © 2014 García-Pérez. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience García-Pérez, Miguel A. Does time ever fly or slow down? The difficult interpretation of psychophysical data on time perception |
title | Does time ever fly or slow down? The difficult interpretation of psychophysical data on time perception |
title_full | Does time ever fly or slow down? The difficult interpretation of psychophysical data on time perception |
title_fullStr | Does time ever fly or slow down? The difficult interpretation of psychophysical data on time perception |
title_full_unstemmed | Does time ever fly or slow down? The difficult interpretation of psychophysical data on time perception |
title_short | Does time ever fly or slow down? The difficult interpretation of psychophysical data on time perception |
title_sort | does time ever fly or slow down? the difficult interpretation of psychophysical data on time perception |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4051264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24959133 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00415 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garciaperezmiguela doestimeeverflyorslowdownthedifficultinterpretationofpsychophysicaldataontimeperception |