Cargando…

Assessment of treatment response in chronic constipation clinical trials

BACKGROUND: While chronic constipation (CC) clinical trials have focused primarily on bowel symptoms (symptoms directly related to bowel movements), abdominal symptoms are also prevalent among patients. The United States Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) guidance on the use of patient-reported...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ervin, Claire M, Fehnel, Sheri E, Baird, Mollie J, Carson, Robyn T, Johnston, Jeffrey M, Shiff, Steven J, Kurtz, Caroline B, Mangel, Allen W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4051515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24940076
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S58321
_version_ 1782320103724941312
author Ervin, Claire M
Fehnel, Sheri E
Baird, Mollie J
Carson, Robyn T
Johnston, Jeffrey M
Shiff, Steven J
Kurtz, Caroline B
Mangel, Allen W
author_facet Ervin, Claire M
Fehnel, Sheri E
Baird, Mollie J
Carson, Robyn T
Johnston, Jeffrey M
Shiff, Steven J
Kurtz, Caroline B
Mangel, Allen W
author_sort Ervin, Claire M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While chronic constipation (CC) clinical trials have focused primarily on bowel symptoms (symptoms directly related to bowel movements), abdominal symptoms are also prevalent among patients. The United States Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) guidance on the use of patient-reported outcome measures to support product approvals or labeling claims recommends that endpoints be developed with direct patient input and include all symptoms important to patients. AIM: To identify a comprehensive set of CC symptoms that are important to patients for measurement in clinical trials. METHODS: Following a targeted literature review to identify CC symptoms previously reported by patients, 28 patient interviews were conducted consistent with the FDA’s guidance on patient-reported outcomes. Subsequent to open-ended questions eliciting descriptions of all symptoms, rating and ranking methods were used to identify those of greatest importance to patients. RESULTS: All 67 studies reviewed included bowel symptoms; more than half also addressed at least one abdominal symptom. Interview participants reported 62 potentially distinct concepts: 12 bowel symptoms; 21 abdominal symptoms; and 29 additional symptoms/impacts. Patients’ descriptions revealed that many symptom terms were highly related and/or could be considered secondary to CC. The rating and ranking task results suggest that both bowel (for example, stool frequency and consistency) and abdominal symptoms (for example, bloating, abdominal pain) comprise patients’ most important symptoms. Further, improvements in both bowel and abdominal symptoms would constitute an improvement in patients’ CC overall. CONCLUSION: Abdominal symptoms in CC patients are equal in relevance to bowel symptoms and should also be addressed in clinical trials to fully evaluate treatment benefit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4051515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40515152014-06-17 Assessment of treatment response in chronic constipation clinical trials Ervin, Claire M Fehnel, Sheri E Baird, Mollie J Carson, Robyn T Johnston, Jeffrey M Shiff, Steven J Kurtz, Caroline B Mangel, Allen W Clin Exp Gastroenterol Original Research BACKGROUND: While chronic constipation (CC) clinical trials have focused primarily on bowel symptoms (symptoms directly related to bowel movements), abdominal symptoms are also prevalent among patients. The United States Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) guidance on the use of patient-reported outcome measures to support product approvals or labeling claims recommends that endpoints be developed with direct patient input and include all symptoms important to patients. AIM: To identify a comprehensive set of CC symptoms that are important to patients for measurement in clinical trials. METHODS: Following a targeted literature review to identify CC symptoms previously reported by patients, 28 patient interviews were conducted consistent with the FDA’s guidance on patient-reported outcomes. Subsequent to open-ended questions eliciting descriptions of all symptoms, rating and ranking methods were used to identify those of greatest importance to patients. RESULTS: All 67 studies reviewed included bowel symptoms; more than half also addressed at least one abdominal symptom. Interview participants reported 62 potentially distinct concepts: 12 bowel symptoms; 21 abdominal symptoms; and 29 additional symptoms/impacts. Patients’ descriptions revealed that many symptom terms were highly related and/or could be considered secondary to CC. The rating and ranking task results suggest that both bowel (for example, stool frequency and consistency) and abdominal symptoms (for example, bloating, abdominal pain) comprise patients’ most important symptoms. Further, improvements in both bowel and abdominal symptoms would constitute an improvement in patients’ CC overall. CONCLUSION: Abdominal symptoms in CC patients are equal in relevance to bowel symptoms and should also be addressed in clinical trials to fully evaluate treatment benefit. Dove Medical Press 2014-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4051515/ /pubmed/24940076 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S58321 Text en © 2014 Ervin et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ervin, Claire M
Fehnel, Sheri E
Baird, Mollie J
Carson, Robyn T
Johnston, Jeffrey M
Shiff, Steven J
Kurtz, Caroline B
Mangel, Allen W
Assessment of treatment response in chronic constipation clinical trials
title Assessment of treatment response in chronic constipation clinical trials
title_full Assessment of treatment response in chronic constipation clinical trials
title_fullStr Assessment of treatment response in chronic constipation clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of treatment response in chronic constipation clinical trials
title_short Assessment of treatment response in chronic constipation clinical trials
title_sort assessment of treatment response in chronic constipation clinical trials
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4051515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24940076
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S58321
work_keys_str_mv AT ervinclairem assessmentoftreatmentresponseinchronicconstipationclinicaltrials
AT fehnelsherie assessmentoftreatmentresponseinchronicconstipationclinicaltrials
AT bairdmolliej assessmentoftreatmentresponseinchronicconstipationclinicaltrials
AT carsonrobynt assessmentoftreatmentresponseinchronicconstipationclinicaltrials
AT johnstonjeffreym assessmentoftreatmentresponseinchronicconstipationclinicaltrials
AT shiffstevenj assessmentoftreatmentresponseinchronicconstipationclinicaltrials
AT kurtzcarolineb assessmentoftreatmentresponseinchronicconstipationclinicaltrials
AT mangelallenw assessmentoftreatmentresponseinchronicconstipationclinicaltrials