Cargando…

Anonymity Versus Privacy: Selective Information Sharing in Online Cancer Communities

BACKGROUND: Active sharing in online cancer communities benefits patients. However, many patients refrain from sharing health information online due to privacy concerns. Existing research on privacy emphasizes data security and confidentiality, largely focusing on electronic medical records. Patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frost, Jeana, Vermeulen, Ivar E, Beekers, Nienke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4051744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24828114
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2684
_version_ 1782320139935416320
author Frost, Jeana
Vermeulen, Ivar E
Beekers, Nienke
author_facet Frost, Jeana
Vermeulen, Ivar E
Beekers, Nienke
author_sort Frost, Jeana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Active sharing in online cancer communities benefits patients. However, many patients refrain from sharing health information online due to privacy concerns. Existing research on privacy emphasizes data security and confidentiality, largely focusing on electronic medical records. Patient preferences around information sharing in online communities remain poorly understood. Consistent with the privacy calculus perspective adopted from e-commerce research, we suggest that patients approach online information sharing instrumentally, weighing privacy costs against participation benefits when deciding whether to share certain information. Consequently, we argue that patients prefer sharing clinical information over daily life and identity information that potentially compromises anonymity. Furthermore, we explore whether patients’ prior experiences, age, health, and gender affect perceived privacy costs and thus willingness to share information. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the present study is to document patient preferences for sharing information within online health platforms. METHODS: A total of 115 cancer patients reported sharing intentions for 15 different types of information, demographics, health status, prior privacy experiences, expected community utility, and privacy concerns. RESULTS: Factor analysis on the 15 information types revealed 3 factors coinciding with 3 proposed information categories: clinical, daily life, and identity information. A within-subject ANOVA showed a strong preference for sharing clinical information compared to daily life and identity information (F (1,114)=135.59, P=.001, η(2)=.93). Also, adverse online privacy experiences, age, and health status negatively affected information-sharing intentions. Female patients shared information less willingly. CONCLUSIONS: Respondents’ information-sharing intentions depend on dispositional and situational factors. Patients share medical details more willingly than daily life or identity information. The results suggest the need to focus on anonymity rather than privacy in online communities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4051744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher JMIR Publications Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40517442014-06-11 Anonymity Versus Privacy: Selective Information Sharing in Online Cancer Communities Frost, Jeana Vermeulen, Ivar E Beekers, Nienke J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Active sharing in online cancer communities benefits patients. However, many patients refrain from sharing health information online due to privacy concerns. Existing research on privacy emphasizes data security and confidentiality, largely focusing on electronic medical records. Patient preferences around information sharing in online communities remain poorly understood. Consistent with the privacy calculus perspective adopted from e-commerce research, we suggest that patients approach online information sharing instrumentally, weighing privacy costs against participation benefits when deciding whether to share certain information. Consequently, we argue that patients prefer sharing clinical information over daily life and identity information that potentially compromises anonymity. Furthermore, we explore whether patients’ prior experiences, age, health, and gender affect perceived privacy costs and thus willingness to share information. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the present study is to document patient preferences for sharing information within online health platforms. METHODS: A total of 115 cancer patients reported sharing intentions for 15 different types of information, demographics, health status, prior privacy experiences, expected community utility, and privacy concerns. RESULTS: Factor analysis on the 15 information types revealed 3 factors coinciding with 3 proposed information categories: clinical, daily life, and identity information. A within-subject ANOVA showed a strong preference for sharing clinical information compared to daily life and identity information (F (1,114)=135.59, P=.001, η(2)=.93). Also, adverse online privacy experiences, age, and health status negatively affected information-sharing intentions. Female patients shared information less willingly. CONCLUSIONS: Respondents’ information-sharing intentions depend on dispositional and situational factors. Patients share medical details more willingly than daily life or identity information. The results suggest the need to focus on anonymity rather than privacy in online communities. JMIR Publications Inc. 2014-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4051744/ /pubmed/24828114 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2684 Text en ©Jeana Frost, Ivar E Vermeulen, Nienke Beekers. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 14.05.2014. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Frost, Jeana
Vermeulen, Ivar E
Beekers, Nienke
Anonymity Versus Privacy: Selective Information Sharing in Online Cancer Communities
title Anonymity Versus Privacy: Selective Information Sharing in Online Cancer Communities
title_full Anonymity Versus Privacy: Selective Information Sharing in Online Cancer Communities
title_fullStr Anonymity Versus Privacy: Selective Information Sharing in Online Cancer Communities
title_full_unstemmed Anonymity Versus Privacy: Selective Information Sharing in Online Cancer Communities
title_short Anonymity Versus Privacy: Selective Information Sharing in Online Cancer Communities
title_sort anonymity versus privacy: selective information sharing in online cancer communities
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4051744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24828114
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2684
work_keys_str_mv AT frostjeana anonymityversusprivacyselectiveinformationsharinginonlinecancercommunities
AT vermeulenivare anonymityversusprivacyselectiveinformationsharinginonlinecancercommunities
AT beekersnienke anonymityversusprivacyselectiveinformationsharinginonlinecancercommunities