Cargando…

A 6-month, subject-masked, randomized controlled study to assess efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjunct to bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab alone in the treatment of patients with macular edema due to central or branch retinal vein occlusion

AIMS: To determine if intravitreal bevacizumab combined with the dexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg improves visual acuity and macular thickness more than bevacizumab monotherapy in eyes with macular edema due to branch and central retinal vein occlusions. METHODS: Thirty eyes were randomly a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maturi, Raj K, Chen, Vincent, Raghinaru, Dan, Bleau, Laurie, Stewart, Michael W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4051812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24940042
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S60159
_version_ 1782320154981433344
author Maturi, Raj K
Chen, Vincent
Raghinaru, Dan
Bleau, Laurie
Stewart, Michael W
author_facet Maturi, Raj K
Chen, Vincent
Raghinaru, Dan
Bleau, Laurie
Stewart, Michael W
author_sort Maturi, Raj K
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To determine if intravitreal bevacizumab combined with the dexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg improves visual acuity and macular thickness more than bevacizumab monotherapy in eyes with macular edema due to branch and central retinal vein occlusions. METHODS: Thirty eyes were randomly assigned to receive either combination therapy or bevacizumab monotherapy. All patients received intravitreal bevacizumab at baseline, followed by dexamethasone implants or sham injections 1 week later. Monthly bevacizumab injections were given if the central subfield thickness (CST) was >250 μm, and the combined group received a second implant at month 4 or 5 if CST was >250 μm. RESULTS: At 6 months, several secondary endpoints were met. Patients receiving combined therapy required fewer bevacizumab reinjections compared to those receiving monotherapy (two versus three; P=0.02), experienced greater mean reductions in CST from randomization (−56 μm versus +45 μm; P=0.01), and were more likely to have resolved all edema (CST <250 μm) (7/11 versus 2/14; P=0.02). The primary endpoint was not met since mean visual acuity changes from baseline were similar in the two groups (P=0.75). CONCLUSION: In patients with macular edema due to vein occlusions, bevacizumab with dexamethasone implants produces greater improvements in macular thickness compared to bevacizumab monotherapy, despite fewer bevacizumab injections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4051812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40518122014-06-17 A 6-month, subject-masked, randomized controlled study to assess efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjunct to bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab alone in the treatment of patients with macular edema due to central or branch retinal vein occlusion Maturi, Raj K Chen, Vincent Raghinaru, Dan Bleau, Laurie Stewart, Michael W Clin Ophthalmol Original Research AIMS: To determine if intravitreal bevacizumab combined with the dexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg improves visual acuity and macular thickness more than bevacizumab monotherapy in eyes with macular edema due to branch and central retinal vein occlusions. METHODS: Thirty eyes were randomly assigned to receive either combination therapy or bevacizumab monotherapy. All patients received intravitreal bevacizumab at baseline, followed by dexamethasone implants or sham injections 1 week later. Monthly bevacizumab injections were given if the central subfield thickness (CST) was >250 μm, and the combined group received a second implant at month 4 or 5 if CST was >250 μm. RESULTS: At 6 months, several secondary endpoints were met. Patients receiving combined therapy required fewer bevacizumab reinjections compared to those receiving monotherapy (two versus three; P=0.02), experienced greater mean reductions in CST from randomization (−56 μm versus +45 μm; P=0.01), and were more likely to have resolved all edema (CST <250 μm) (7/11 versus 2/14; P=0.02). The primary endpoint was not met since mean visual acuity changes from baseline were similar in the two groups (P=0.75). CONCLUSION: In patients with macular edema due to vein occlusions, bevacizumab with dexamethasone implants produces greater improvements in macular thickness compared to bevacizumab monotherapy, despite fewer bevacizumab injections. Dove Medical Press 2014-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4051812/ /pubmed/24940042 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S60159 Text en © 2014 Maturi et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Maturi, Raj K
Chen, Vincent
Raghinaru, Dan
Bleau, Laurie
Stewart, Michael W
A 6-month, subject-masked, randomized controlled study to assess efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjunct to bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab alone in the treatment of patients with macular edema due to central or branch retinal vein occlusion
title A 6-month, subject-masked, randomized controlled study to assess efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjunct to bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab alone in the treatment of patients with macular edema due to central or branch retinal vein occlusion
title_full A 6-month, subject-masked, randomized controlled study to assess efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjunct to bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab alone in the treatment of patients with macular edema due to central or branch retinal vein occlusion
title_fullStr A 6-month, subject-masked, randomized controlled study to assess efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjunct to bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab alone in the treatment of patients with macular edema due to central or branch retinal vein occlusion
title_full_unstemmed A 6-month, subject-masked, randomized controlled study to assess efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjunct to bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab alone in the treatment of patients with macular edema due to central or branch retinal vein occlusion
title_short A 6-month, subject-masked, randomized controlled study to assess efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjunct to bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab alone in the treatment of patients with macular edema due to central or branch retinal vein occlusion
title_sort 6-month, subject-masked, randomized controlled study to assess efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjunct to bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab alone in the treatment of patients with macular edema due to central or branch retinal vein occlusion
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4051812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24940042
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S60159
work_keys_str_mv AT maturirajk a6monthsubjectmaskedrandomizedcontrolledstudytoassessefficacyofdexamethasoneasanadjuncttobevacizumabcomparedwithbevacizumabaloneinthetreatmentofpatientswithmacularedemaduetocentralorbranchretinalveinocclusion
AT chenvincent a6monthsubjectmaskedrandomizedcontrolledstudytoassessefficacyofdexamethasoneasanadjuncttobevacizumabcomparedwithbevacizumabaloneinthetreatmentofpatientswithmacularedemaduetocentralorbranchretinalveinocclusion
AT raghinarudan a6monthsubjectmaskedrandomizedcontrolledstudytoassessefficacyofdexamethasoneasanadjuncttobevacizumabcomparedwithbevacizumabaloneinthetreatmentofpatientswithmacularedemaduetocentralorbranchretinalveinocclusion
AT bleaulaurie a6monthsubjectmaskedrandomizedcontrolledstudytoassessefficacyofdexamethasoneasanadjuncttobevacizumabcomparedwithbevacizumabaloneinthetreatmentofpatientswithmacularedemaduetocentralorbranchretinalveinocclusion
AT stewartmichaelw a6monthsubjectmaskedrandomizedcontrolledstudytoassessefficacyofdexamethasoneasanadjuncttobevacizumabcomparedwithbevacizumabaloneinthetreatmentofpatientswithmacularedemaduetocentralorbranchretinalveinocclusion
AT maturirajk 6monthsubjectmaskedrandomizedcontrolledstudytoassessefficacyofdexamethasoneasanadjuncttobevacizumabcomparedwithbevacizumabaloneinthetreatmentofpatientswithmacularedemaduetocentralorbranchretinalveinocclusion
AT chenvincent 6monthsubjectmaskedrandomizedcontrolledstudytoassessefficacyofdexamethasoneasanadjuncttobevacizumabcomparedwithbevacizumabaloneinthetreatmentofpatientswithmacularedemaduetocentralorbranchretinalveinocclusion
AT raghinarudan 6monthsubjectmaskedrandomizedcontrolledstudytoassessefficacyofdexamethasoneasanadjuncttobevacizumabcomparedwithbevacizumabaloneinthetreatmentofpatientswithmacularedemaduetocentralorbranchretinalveinocclusion
AT bleaulaurie 6monthsubjectmaskedrandomizedcontrolledstudytoassessefficacyofdexamethasoneasanadjuncttobevacizumabcomparedwithbevacizumabaloneinthetreatmentofpatientswithmacularedemaduetocentralorbranchretinalveinocclusion
AT stewartmichaelw 6monthsubjectmaskedrandomizedcontrolledstudytoassessefficacyofdexamethasoneasanadjuncttobevacizumabcomparedwithbevacizumabaloneinthetreatmentofpatientswithmacularedemaduetocentralorbranchretinalveinocclusion