Cargando…
A 6-month, subject-masked, randomized controlled study to assess efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjunct to bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab alone in the treatment of patients with macular edema due to central or branch retinal vein occlusion
AIMS: To determine if intravitreal bevacizumab combined with the dexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg improves visual acuity and macular thickness more than bevacizumab monotherapy in eyes with macular edema due to branch and central retinal vein occlusions. METHODS: Thirty eyes were randomly a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4051812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24940042 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S60159 |
_version_ | 1782320154981433344 |
---|---|
author | Maturi, Raj K Chen, Vincent Raghinaru, Dan Bleau, Laurie Stewart, Michael W |
author_facet | Maturi, Raj K Chen, Vincent Raghinaru, Dan Bleau, Laurie Stewart, Michael W |
author_sort | Maturi, Raj K |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To determine if intravitreal bevacizumab combined with the dexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg improves visual acuity and macular thickness more than bevacizumab monotherapy in eyes with macular edema due to branch and central retinal vein occlusions. METHODS: Thirty eyes were randomly assigned to receive either combination therapy or bevacizumab monotherapy. All patients received intravitreal bevacizumab at baseline, followed by dexamethasone implants or sham injections 1 week later. Monthly bevacizumab injections were given if the central subfield thickness (CST) was >250 μm, and the combined group received a second implant at month 4 or 5 if CST was >250 μm. RESULTS: At 6 months, several secondary endpoints were met. Patients receiving combined therapy required fewer bevacizumab reinjections compared to those receiving monotherapy (two versus three; P=0.02), experienced greater mean reductions in CST from randomization (−56 μm versus +45 μm; P=0.01), and were more likely to have resolved all edema (CST <250 μm) (7/11 versus 2/14; P=0.02). The primary endpoint was not met since mean visual acuity changes from baseline were similar in the two groups (P=0.75). CONCLUSION: In patients with macular edema due to vein occlusions, bevacizumab with dexamethasone implants produces greater improvements in macular thickness compared to bevacizumab monotherapy, despite fewer bevacizumab injections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4051812 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40518122014-06-17 A 6-month, subject-masked, randomized controlled study to assess efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjunct to bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab alone in the treatment of patients with macular edema due to central or branch retinal vein occlusion Maturi, Raj K Chen, Vincent Raghinaru, Dan Bleau, Laurie Stewart, Michael W Clin Ophthalmol Original Research AIMS: To determine if intravitreal bevacizumab combined with the dexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg improves visual acuity and macular thickness more than bevacizumab monotherapy in eyes with macular edema due to branch and central retinal vein occlusions. METHODS: Thirty eyes were randomly assigned to receive either combination therapy or bevacizumab monotherapy. All patients received intravitreal bevacizumab at baseline, followed by dexamethasone implants or sham injections 1 week later. Monthly bevacizumab injections were given if the central subfield thickness (CST) was >250 μm, and the combined group received a second implant at month 4 or 5 if CST was >250 μm. RESULTS: At 6 months, several secondary endpoints were met. Patients receiving combined therapy required fewer bevacizumab reinjections compared to those receiving monotherapy (two versus three; P=0.02), experienced greater mean reductions in CST from randomization (−56 μm versus +45 μm; P=0.01), and were more likely to have resolved all edema (CST <250 μm) (7/11 versus 2/14; P=0.02). The primary endpoint was not met since mean visual acuity changes from baseline were similar in the two groups (P=0.75). CONCLUSION: In patients with macular edema due to vein occlusions, bevacizumab with dexamethasone implants produces greater improvements in macular thickness compared to bevacizumab monotherapy, despite fewer bevacizumab injections. Dove Medical Press 2014-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4051812/ /pubmed/24940042 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S60159 Text en © 2014 Maturi et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Maturi, Raj K Chen, Vincent Raghinaru, Dan Bleau, Laurie Stewart, Michael W A 6-month, subject-masked, randomized controlled study to assess efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjunct to bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab alone in the treatment of patients with macular edema due to central or branch retinal vein occlusion |
title | A 6-month, subject-masked, randomized controlled study to assess efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjunct to bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab alone in the treatment of patients with macular edema due to central or branch retinal vein occlusion |
title_full | A 6-month, subject-masked, randomized controlled study to assess efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjunct to bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab alone in the treatment of patients with macular edema due to central or branch retinal vein occlusion |
title_fullStr | A 6-month, subject-masked, randomized controlled study to assess efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjunct to bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab alone in the treatment of patients with macular edema due to central or branch retinal vein occlusion |
title_full_unstemmed | A 6-month, subject-masked, randomized controlled study to assess efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjunct to bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab alone in the treatment of patients with macular edema due to central or branch retinal vein occlusion |
title_short | A 6-month, subject-masked, randomized controlled study to assess efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjunct to bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab alone in the treatment of patients with macular edema due to central or branch retinal vein occlusion |
title_sort | 6-month, subject-masked, randomized controlled study to assess efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjunct to bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab alone in the treatment of patients with macular edema due to central or branch retinal vein occlusion |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4051812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24940042 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S60159 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maturirajk a6monthsubjectmaskedrandomizedcontrolledstudytoassessefficacyofdexamethasoneasanadjuncttobevacizumabcomparedwithbevacizumabaloneinthetreatmentofpatientswithmacularedemaduetocentralorbranchretinalveinocclusion AT chenvincent a6monthsubjectmaskedrandomizedcontrolledstudytoassessefficacyofdexamethasoneasanadjuncttobevacizumabcomparedwithbevacizumabaloneinthetreatmentofpatientswithmacularedemaduetocentralorbranchretinalveinocclusion AT raghinarudan a6monthsubjectmaskedrandomizedcontrolledstudytoassessefficacyofdexamethasoneasanadjuncttobevacizumabcomparedwithbevacizumabaloneinthetreatmentofpatientswithmacularedemaduetocentralorbranchretinalveinocclusion AT bleaulaurie a6monthsubjectmaskedrandomizedcontrolledstudytoassessefficacyofdexamethasoneasanadjuncttobevacizumabcomparedwithbevacizumabaloneinthetreatmentofpatientswithmacularedemaduetocentralorbranchretinalveinocclusion AT stewartmichaelw a6monthsubjectmaskedrandomizedcontrolledstudytoassessefficacyofdexamethasoneasanadjuncttobevacizumabcomparedwithbevacizumabaloneinthetreatmentofpatientswithmacularedemaduetocentralorbranchretinalveinocclusion AT maturirajk 6monthsubjectmaskedrandomizedcontrolledstudytoassessefficacyofdexamethasoneasanadjuncttobevacizumabcomparedwithbevacizumabaloneinthetreatmentofpatientswithmacularedemaduetocentralorbranchretinalveinocclusion AT chenvincent 6monthsubjectmaskedrandomizedcontrolledstudytoassessefficacyofdexamethasoneasanadjuncttobevacizumabcomparedwithbevacizumabaloneinthetreatmentofpatientswithmacularedemaduetocentralorbranchretinalveinocclusion AT raghinarudan 6monthsubjectmaskedrandomizedcontrolledstudytoassessefficacyofdexamethasoneasanadjuncttobevacizumabcomparedwithbevacizumabaloneinthetreatmentofpatientswithmacularedemaduetocentralorbranchretinalveinocclusion AT bleaulaurie 6monthsubjectmaskedrandomizedcontrolledstudytoassessefficacyofdexamethasoneasanadjuncttobevacizumabcomparedwithbevacizumabaloneinthetreatmentofpatientswithmacularedemaduetocentralorbranchretinalveinocclusion AT stewartmichaelw 6monthsubjectmaskedrandomizedcontrolledstudytoassessefficacyofdexamethasoneasanadjuncttobevacizumabcomparedwithbevacizumabaloneinthetreatmentofpatientswithmacularedemaduetocentralorbranchretinalveinocclusion |