Cargando…

Autograft reconstructions for bone defects in primary total knee replacement in severe varus knees

BACKGROUND: Large posteromedial defects encountered in severe varus knees during primary total knee arthroplasty can be treated by cementoplasty, structural bone grafts or metallic wedges. The option is selected depending upon the size of the defect. We studied the outcome of autograft (structural a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kharbanda, Yatinder, Sharma, Mrinal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4052033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24932040
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.132525
_version_ 1782320173287473152
author Kharbanda, Yatinder
Sharma, Mrinal
author_facet Kharbanda, Yatinder
Sharma, Mrinal
author_sort Kharbanda, Yatinder
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Large posteromedial defects encountered in severe varus knees during primary total knee arthroplasty can be treated by cementoplasty, structural bone grafts or metallic wedges. The option is selected depending upon the size of the defect. We studied the outcome of autograft (structural and impaction bone grafting) reconstruction of medial tibial bone defects encountered during primary total knee replacement in severe varus knees. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Out of 675 primary varus knees operated, bone defects in proximal tibia were encountered in 54 knees. Posteromedial defects involving 25-40% of the tibial condyle cut surface and measuring more than 5 mm in depth were grafted using a structural graft obtained from cut distal femur or proximal tibia in 48 knees. For larger, peripheral uncontained vertical defects in six cases, measuring >25 mm in depth and involving >40% cut surface of proximal tibial condyle, impaction bone grafting with a mesh support was used. RESULTS: Bone grafts incorporated in 54 knees in 6 months. There was no graft collapse or stress fractures, loosening or nonunion. The average followup period was 7.8 years (range 5-10 years). We observed an average postoperative increase in the Knee Society Score from 40 to 90 points. There was improvement in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores in terms of pain, stiffness and physical function during activities of daily living. CONCLUSION: Bone grafting for defects in primary total knee is justified as it is biological, available then and is cost effective besides preserving bone stock for future revisions. Structural grafts should be used in defects >5 mm deep and involving 25-40% of the cut proximal tibial condyle surface. For larger peripheral vertical defects, impaction bone grafting contained in a mesh should be done.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4052033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40520332014-06-13 Autograft reconstructions for bone defects in primary total knee replacement in severe varus knees Kharbanda, Yatinder Sharma, Mrinal Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: Large posteromedial defects encountered in severe varus knees during primary total knee arthroplasty can be treated by cementoplasty, structural bone grafts or metallic wedges. The option is selected depending upon the size of the defect. We studied the outcome of autograft (structural and impaction bone grafting) reconstruction of medial tibial bone defects encountered during primary total knee replacement in severe varus knees. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Out of 675 primary varus knees operated, bone defects in proximal tibia were encountered in 54 knees. Posteromedial defects involving 25-40% of the tibial condyle cut surface and measuring more than 5 mm in depth were grafted using a structural graft obtained from cut distal femur or proximal tibia in 48 knees. For larger, peripheral uncontained vertical defects in six cases, measuring >25 mm in depth and involving >40% cut surface of proximal tibial condyle, impaction bone grafting with a mesh support was used. RESULTS: Bone grafts incorporated in 54 knees in 6 months. There was no graft collapse or stress fractures, loosening or nonunion. The average followup period was 7.8 years (range 5-10 years). We observed an average postoperative increase in the Knee Society Score from 40 to 90 points. There was improvement in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores in terms of pain, stiffness and physical function during activities of daily living. CONCLUSION: Bone grafting for defects in primary total knee is justified as it is biological, available then and is cost effective besides preserving bone stock for future revisions. Structural grafts should be used in defects >5 mm deep and involving 25-40% of the cut proximal tibial condyle surface. For larger peripheral vertical defects, impaction bone grafting contained in a mesh should be done. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4052033/ /pubmed/24932040 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.132525 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kharbanda, Yatinder
Sharma, Mrinal
Autograft reconstructions for bone defects in primary total knee replacement in severe varus knees
title Autograft reconstructions for bone defects in primary total knee replacement in severe varus knees
title_full Autograft reconstructions for bone defects in primary total knee replacement in severe varus knees
title_fullStr Autograft reconstructions for bone defects in primary total knee replacement in severe varus knees
title_full_unstemmed Autograft reconstructions for bone defects in primary total knee replacement in severe varus knees
title_short Autograft reconstructions for bone defects in primary total knee replacement in severe varus knees
title_sort autograft reconstructions for bone defects in primary total knee replacement in severe varus knees
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4052033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24932040
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.132525
work_keys_str_mv AT kharbandayatinder autograftreconstructionsforbonedefectsinprimarytotalkneereplacementinseverevarusknees
AT sharmamrinal autograftreconstructionsforbonedefectsinprimarytotalkneereplacementinseverevarusknees