Cargando…
Representation and processing of mass and count nouns: a review
Comprehension and/or production of noun phrases and sentences requires the selection of lexical-syntactic attributes of nouns. These lexical-syntactic attributes include grammatical gender (masculine/feminine/neuter), number (singular/plural) and countability (mass/count). While there has been consi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4052098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24966849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00589 |
_version_ | 1782320188012625920 |
---|---|
author | Fieder, Nora Nickels, Lyndsey Biedermann, Britta |
author_facet | Fieder, Nora Nickels, Lyndsey Biedermann, Britta |
author_sort | Fieder, Nora |
collection | PubMed |
description | Comprehension and/or production of noun phrases and sentences requires the selection of lexical-syntactic attributes of nouns. These lexical-syntactic attributes include grammatical gender (masculine/feminine/neuter), number (singular/plural) and countability (mass/count). While there has been considerable discussion regarding gender and number, relatively little attention has focused on countability. Therefore, this article reviews empirical evidence for lexical-syntactic specification of nouns for countability. This includes evidence from studies of language production and comprehension with normal speakers and case studies which assess impairments of mass/count nouns in people with acquired brain damage. Current theories of language processing are reviewed and found to be lacking specification regarding countability. Subsequently, the theoretical implications of the empirical studies are discussed in the context of frameworks derived from these accounts of language production (Levelt, 1989; Levelt et al., 1999) and comprehension (Taler and Jarema, 2006). The review concludes that there is empirical support for specification of nouns for countability at a lexical-syntactic level. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4052098 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40520982014-06-25 Representation and processing of mass and count nouns: a review Fieder, Nora Nickels, Lyndsey Biedermann, Britta Front Psychol Psychology Comprehension and/or production of noun phrases and sentences requires the selection of lexical-syntactic attributes of nouns. These lexical-syntactic attributes include grammatical gender (masculine/feminine/neuter), number (singular/plural) and countability (mass/count). While there has been considerable discussion regarding gender and number, relatively little attention has focused on countability. Therefore, this article reviews empirical evidence for lexical-syntactic specification of nouns for countability. This includes evidence from studies of language production and comprehension with normal speakers and case studies which assess impairments of mass/count nouns in people with acquired brain damage. Current theories of language processing are reviewed and found to be lacking specification regarding countability. Subsequently, the theoretical implications of the empirical studies are discussed in the context of frameworks derived from these accounts of language production (Levelt, 1989; Levelt et al., 1999) and comprehension (Taler and Jarema, 2006). The review concludes that there is empirical support for specification of nouns for countability at a lexical-syntactic level. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4052098/ /pubmed/24966849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00589 Text en Copyright © 2014 Fieder, Nickels and Biedermann. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Fieder, Nora Nickels, Lyndsey Biedermann, Britta Representation and processing of mass and count nouns: a review |
title | Representation and processing of mass and count nouns: a review |
title_full | Representation and processing of mass and count nouns: a review |
title_fullStr | Representation and processing of mass and count nouns: a review |
title_full_unstemmed | Representation and processing of mass and count nouns: a review |
title_short | Representation and processing of mass and count nouns: a review |
title_sort | representation and processing of mass and count nouns: a review |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4052098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24966849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00589 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fiedernora representationandprocessingofmassandcountnounsareview AT nickelslyndsey representationandprocessingofmassandcountnounsareview AT biedermannbritta representationandprocessingofmassandcountnounsareview |