Cargando…

Sample size and power calculations in Mendelian randomization with a single instrumental variable and a binary outcome

Background: Sample size calculations are an important tool for planning epidemiological studies. Large sample sizes are often required in Mendelian randomization investigations. Methods and results: Resources are provided for investigators to perform sample size and power calculations for Mendelian...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Burgess, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4052137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24608958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu005
_version_ 1782320194386919424
author Burgess, Stephen
author_facet Burgess, Stephen
author_sort Burgess, Stephen
collection PubMed
description Background: Sample size calculations are an important tool for planning epidemiological studies. Large sample sizes are often required in Mendelian randomization investigations. Methods and results: Resources are provided for investigators to perform sample size and power calculations for Mendelian randomization with a binary outcome. We initially provide formulae for the continuous outcome case, and then analogous formulae for the binary outcome case. The formulae are valid for a single instrumental variable, which may be a single genetic variant or an allele score comprising multiple variants. Graphs are provided to give the required sample size for 80% power for given values of the causal effect of the risk factor on the outcome and of the squared correlation between the risk factor and instrumental variable. R code and an online calculator tool are made available for calculating the sample size needed for a chosen power level given these parameters, as well as the power given the chosen sample size and these parameters. Conclusions: The sample size required for a given power of Mendelian randomization investigation depends greatly on the proportion of variance in the risk factor explained by the instrumental variable. The inclusion of multiple variants into an allele score to explain more of the variance in the risk factor will improve power, however care must be taken not to introduce bias by the inclusion of invalid variants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4052137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40521372014-06-11 Sample size and power calculations in Mendelian randomization with a single instrumental variable and a binary outcome Burgess, Stephen Int J Epidemiol Methods Background: Sample size calculations are an important tool for planning epidemiological studies. Large sample sizes are often required in Mendelian randomization investigations. Methods and results: Resources are provided for investigators to perform sample size and power calculations for Mendelian randomization with a binary outcome. We initially provide formulae for the continuous outcome case, and then analogous formulae for the binary outcome case. The formulae are valid for a single instrumental variable, which may be a single genetic variant or an allele score comprising multiple variants. Graphs are provided to give the required sample size for 80% power for given values of the causal effect of the risk factor on the outcome and of the squared correlation between the risk factor and instrumental variable. R code and an online calculator tool are made available for calculating the sample size needed for a chosen power level given these parameters, as well as the power given the chosen sample size and these parameters. Conclusions: The sample size required for a given power of Mendelian randomization investigation depends greatly on the proportion of variance in the risk factor explained by the instrumental variable. The inclusion of multiple variants into an allele score to explain more of the variance in the risk factor will improve power, however care must be taken not to introduce bias by the inclusion of invalid variants. Oxford University Press 2014-06 2014-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4052137/ /pubmed/24608958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu005 Text en © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methods
Burgess, Stephen
Sample size and power calculations in Mendelian randomization with a single instrumental variable and a binary outcome
title Sample size and power calculations in Mendelian randomization with a single instrumental variable and a binary outcome
title_full Sample size and power calculations in Mendelian randomization with a single instrumental variable and a binary outcome
title_fullStr Sample size and power calculations in Mendelian randomization with a single instrumental variable and a binary outcome
title_full_unstemmed Sample size and power calculations in Mendelian randomization with a single instrumental variable and a binary outcome
title_short Sample size and power calculations in Mendelian randomization with a single instrumental variable and a binary outcome
title_sort sample size and power calculations in mendelian randomization with a single instrumental variable and a binary outcome
topic Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4052137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24608958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu005
work_keys_str_mv AT burgessstephen samplesizeandpowercalculationsinmendelianrandomizationwithasingleinstrumentalvariableandabinaryoutcome