Cargando…

Comparison of complementary and alternative medicine with conventional mind–body therapies for chronic back pain: protocol for the Mind–body Approaches to Pain (MAP) randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The self-reported health and functional status of persons with back pain in the United States have declined in recent years, despite greatly increased medical expenditures due to this problem. Although patient psychosocial factors such as pain-related beliefs, thoughts and coping behavio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cherkin, Daniel C, Sherman, Karen J, Balderson, Benjamin H, Turner, Judith A, Cook, Andrea J, Stoelb, Brenda, Herman, Patricia M, Deyo, Richard A, Hawkes, Rene J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4052284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24906419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-211
_version_ 1782320214692593664
author Cherkin, Daniel C
Sherman, Karen J
Balderson, Benjamin H
Turner, Judith A
Cook, Andrea J
Stoelb, Brenda
Herman, Patricia M
Deyo, Richard A
Hawkes, Rene J
author_facet Cherkin, Daniel C
Sherman, Karen J
Balderson, Benjamin H
Turner, Judith A
Cook, Andrea J
Stoelb, Brenda
Herman, Patricia M
Deyo, Richard A
Hawkes, Rene J
author_sort Cherkin, Daniel C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The self-reported health and functional status of persons with back pain in the United States have declined in recent years, despite greatly increased medical expenditures due to this problem. Although patient psychosocial factors such as pain-related beliefs, thoughts and coping behaviors have been demonstrated to affect how well patients respond to treatments for back pain, few patients receive treatments that address these factors. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), which addresses psychosocial factors, has been found to be effective for back pain, but access to qualified therapists is limited. Another treatment option with potential for addressing psychosocial issues, mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), is increasingly available. MBSR has been found to be helpful for various mental and physical conditions, but it has not been well-studied for application with chronic back pain patients. In this trial, we will seek to determine whether MBSR is an effective and cost-effective treatment option for persons with chronic back pain, compare its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness compared with CBT and explore the psychosocial variables that may mediate the effects of MBSR and CBT on patient outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: In this trial, we will randomize 397 adults with nonspecific chronic back pain to CBT, MBSR or usual care arms (99 per group). Both interventions will consist of eight weekly 2-hour group sessions supplemented by home practice. The MBSR protocol also includes an optional 6-hour retreat. Interviewers masked to treatment assignments will assess outcomes 5, 10, 26 and 52 weeks postrandomization. The primary outcomes will be pain-related functional limitations (based on the Roland Disability Questionnaire) and symptom bothersomeness (rated on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale) at 26 weeks. DISCUSSION: If MBSR is found to be an effective and cost-effective treatment option for patients with chronic back pain, it will become a valuable addition to the limited treatment options available to patients with significant psychosocial contributors to their pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01467843.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4052284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40522842014-06-20 Comparison of complementary and alternative medicine with conventional mind–body therapies for chronic back pain: protocol for the Mind–body Approaches to Pain (MAP) randomized controlled trial Cherkin, Daniel C Sherman, Karen J Balderson, Benjamin H Turner, Judith A Cook, Andrea J Stoelb, Brenda Herman, Patricia M Deyo, Richard A Hawkes, Rene J Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The self-reported health and functional status of persons with back pain in the United States have declined in recent years, despite greatly increased medical expenditures due to this problem. Although patient psychosocial factors such as pain-related beliefs, thoughts and coping behaviors have been demonstrated to affect how well patients respond to treatments for back pain, few patients receive treatments that address these factors. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), which addresses psychosocial factors, has been found to be effective for back pain, but access to qualified therapists is limited. Another treatment option with potential for addressing psychosocial issues, mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), is increasingly available. MBSR has been found to be helpful for various mental and physical conditions, but it has not been well-studied for application with chronic back pain patients. In this trial, we will seek to determine whether MBSR is an effective and cost-effective treatment option for persons with chronic back pain, compare its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness compared with CBT and explore the psychosocial variables that may mediate the effects of MBSR and CBT on patient outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: In this trial, we will randomize 397 adults with nonspecific chronic back pain to CBT, MBSR or usual care arms (99 per group). Both interventions will consist of eight weekly 2-hour group sessions supplemented by home practice. The MBSR protocol also includes an optional 6-hour retreat. Interviewers masked to treatment assignments will assess outcomes 5, 10, 26 and 52 weeks postrandomization. The primary outcomes will be pain-related functional limitations (based on the Roland Disability Questionnaire) and symptom bothersomeness (rated on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale) at 26 weeks. DISCUSSION: If MBSR is found to be an effective and cost-effective treatment option for patients with chronic back pain, it will become a valuable addition to the limited treatment options available to patients with significant psychosocial contributors to their pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01467843. BioMed Central 2014-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4052284/ /pubmed/24906419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-211 Text en Copyright © 2014 Cherkin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Cherkin, Daniel C
Sherman, Karen J
Balderson, Benjamin H
Turner, Judith A
Cook, Andrea J
Stoelb, Brenda
Herman, Patricia M
Deyo, Richard A
Hawkes, Rene J
Comparison of complementary and alternative medicine with conventional mind–body therapies for chronic back pain: protocol for the Mind–body Approaches to Pain (MAP) randomized controlled trial
title Comparison of complementary and alternative medicine with conventional mind–body therapies for chronic back pain: protocol for the Mind–body Approaches to Pain (MAP) randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of complementary and alternative medicine with conventional mind–body therapies for chronic back pain: protocol for the Mind–body Approaches to Pain (MAP) randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of complementary and alternative medicine with conventional mind–body therapies for chronic back pain: protocol for the Mind–body Approaches to Pain (MAP) randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of complementary and alternative medicine with conventional mind–body therapies for chronic back pain: protocol for the Mind–body Approaches to Pain (MAP) randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of complementary and alternative medicine with conventional mind–body therapies for chronic back pain: protocol for the Mind–body Approaches to Pain (MAP) randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of complementary and alternative medicine with conventional mind–body therapies for chronic back pain: protocol for the mind–body approaches to pain (map) randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4052284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24906419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-211
work_keys_str_mv AT cherkindanielc comparisonofcomplementaryandalternativemedicinewithconventionalmindbodytherapiesforchronicbackpainprotocolforthemindbodyapproachestopainmaprandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shermankarenj comparisonofcomplementaryandalternativemedicinewithconventionalmindbodytherapiesforchronicbackpainprotocolforthemindbodyapproachestopainmaprandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT baldersonbenjaminh comparisonofcomplementaryandalternativemedicinewithconventionalmindbodytherapiesforchronicbackpainprotocolforthemindbodyapproachestopainmaprandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT turnerjuditha comparisonofcomplementaryandalternativemedicinewithconventionalmindbodytherapiesforchronicbackpainprotocolforthemindbodyapproachestopainmaprandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cookandreaj comparisonofcomplementaryandalternativemedicinewithconventionalmindbodytherapiesforchronicbackpainprotocolforthemindbodyapproachestopainmaprandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stoelbbrenda comparisonofcomplementaryandalternativemedicinewithconventionalmindbodytherapiesforchronicbackpainprotocolforthemindbodyapproachestopainmaprandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hermanpatriciam comparisonofcomplementaryandalternativemedicinewithconventionalmindbodytherapiesforchronicbackpainprotocolforthemindbodyapproachestopainmaprandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT deyoricharda comparisonofcomplementaryandalternativemedicinewithconventionalmindbodytherapiesforchronicbackpainprotocolforthemindbodyapproachestopainmaprandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hawkesrenej comparisonofcomplementaryandalternativemedicinewithconventionalmindbodytherapiesforchronicbackpainprotocolforthemindbodyapproachestopainmaprandomizedcontrolledtrial