Cargando…

Effects of the once-daily GLP-1 analog liraglutide on gastric emptying, glycemic parameters, appetite and energy metabolism in obese, non-diabetic adults

INTRODUCTION: Mechanisms for liraglutide-induced weight loss are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effects of liraglutide on gastric emptying, glycemic parameters, appetite and energy metabolism in obese non-diabetic individuals. DESIGN: Participants (N=49, 18–75 years, body mass ind...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Can, J, Sloth, B, Jensen, C B, Flint, A, Blaak, E E, Saris, W H M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4052428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23999198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2013.162
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Mechanisms for liraglutide-induced weight loss are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effects of liraglutide on gastric emptying, glycemic parameters, appetite and energy metabolism in obese non-diabetic individuals. DESIGN: Participants (N=49, 18–75 years, body mass index: 30–40 kg m(−2)) were randomized to two of three treatments: liraglutide 1.8 mg, 3.0 mg, or placebo in a double-blind, incomplete crossover trial. After 5 weeks, 24-h energy expenditure (EE) and substrate oxidation were measured in a respiratory chamber. Gastric emptying (acetaminophen absorption method), glycemic parameters and appetite were assessed during a 5-h meal test. Ad libitum energy intake during a subsequent lunch was also assessed. RESULTS: Five-hour gastric emptying (AUC(0–300 min)) was found to be equivalent for liraglutide 1.8 versus 3.0 mg (primary end point), and for both liraglutide doses versus placebo, as 90% confidence intervals for the estimated treatment ratios were contained within the prespecified interval (0.80–1.25). However, 1-h gastric emptying was 23% lower than placebo with liraglutide 3.0 mg (P=0.007), and a nonsignificant 13% lower than placebo with liraglutide 1.8 mg (P=0.14). Both liraglutide doses similarly reduced fasting glucose (0.5–0.6 mmol l(−1) versus placebo, P<0.0001), glucose C(max) and 1-h AUC versus placebo; only liraglutide 3.0 mg reduced iAUC(0–300 min) (by ∼26% versus placebo, P=0.02). Glucagon iAUC(0–300 min) decreased by ∼30%, and iAUC(0–60 min) for insulin and C-peptide was ∼20% lower with both liraglutide doses versus placebo. Liraglutide doses similarly increased mean postprandial satiety and fullness ratings, reduced hunger and prospective food consumption and decreased ad libitum energy intake by ∼16%. Liraglutide-associated reductions in EE were partly explained by a decrease in body weight. A relative shift toward increased fat and reduced carbohydrate oxidation was observed with liraglutide. Clinicaltrials.gov ID:NCT00978393. Funding: Novo Nordisk. CONCLUSION: Gastric emptying AUC(0–300 min) was equivalent for liraglutide 1.8 and 3.0 mg, and for liraglutide versus placebo, whereas reductions in 1-h gastric emptying of 23% with liraglutide 3.0 mg and 13% with 1.8 mg versus placebo were observed. Liraglutide 3.0 mg improved postprandial glycemia to a greater extent than liraglutide 1.8 mg. Liraglutide-induced weight loss appears to be mediated by reduced appetite and energy intake rather than increased EE.