Cargando…

Modelling the overdiagnosis of breast cancer due to mammography screening in women aged 40 to 49 in the United Kingdom

INTRODUCTION: Overdiagnosis of breast cancer due to mammography screening, defined as the diagnosis of screen-detected cancers that would not have presented clinically in a women's lifetime in the absence of screening, has emerged as a highly contentious issue, as harm caused may question the b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gunsoy, Necdet B, Garcia-Closas, Montserrat, Moss, Sue M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4053139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23194032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr3365
_version_ 1782320329484402688
author Gunsoy, Necdet B
Garcia-Closas, Montserrat
Moss, Sue M
author_facet Gunsoy, Necdet B
Garcia-Closas, Montserrat
Moss, Sue M
author_sort Gunsoy, Necdet B
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Overdiagnosis of breast cancer due to mammography screening, defined as the diagnosis of screen-detected cancers that would not have presented clinically in a women's lifetime in the absence of screening, has emerged as a highly contentious issue, as harm caused may question the benefit of mammographic screening. Most studies included women over 50 years old and little information is available for younger women. METHODS: We estimated the overdiagnosis of breast cancer due to screening in women aged 40 to 49 years using data from a randomised trial of annual mammographic screening starting at age 40 conducted in the UK. A six-state Markov model was constructed to estimate the sensitivity of mammography for invasive and in situ breast cancer and the screen-detectable mean sojourn time for non-progressive in situ, progressive in situ, and invasive breast cancer. Then, a 10-state simulation model of cancer progression, screening, and death, was developed to estimate overdiagnosis attributable to screening. RESULTS: The sensitivity of mammography for invasive and in situ breast cancers was 90% (95% CI, 72 to 99) and 82% (43 to 99), respectively. The screen-detectable mean sojourn time of preclinical non-progressive and progressive in situ cancers was 1.3 (0.4 to 3.4) and 0.11 (0.05 to 0.19) years, respectively, and 0.8 years (0.6 to 1.2) for preclinical invasive breast cancer. The proportion of screen-detected in situ cancers that were non-progressive was 55% (25 to 77) for the first and 40% (22 to 60) for subsequent screens. In our main analysis, overdiagnosis was estimated as 0.7% of screen-detected cancers. A sensitivity analysis, covering a wide range of alternative scenarios, yielded a range of 0.5% to 2.9%. CONCLUSION: Although a high proportion of screen-detected in situ cancers were non-progressive, a majority of these would have presented clinically in the absence of screening. The extent of overdiagnosis due to screening in women aged 40 to 49 was small. Results also suggest annual screening is most suitable for women aged 40 to 49 in the United Kingdom due to short cancer sojourn times.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4053139
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40531392014-06-12 Modelling the overdiagnosis of breast cancer due to mammography screening in women aged 40 to 49 in the United Kingdom Gunsoy, Necdet B Garcia-Closas, Montserrat Moss, Sue M Breast Cancer Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: Overdiagnosis of breast cancer due to mammography screening, defined as the diagnosis of screen-detected cancers that would not have presented clinically in a women's lifetime in the absence of screening, has emerged as a highly contentious issue, as harm caused may question the benefit of mammographic screening. Most studies included women over 50 years old and little information is available for younger women. METHODS: We estimated the overdiagnosis of breast cancer due to screening in women aged 40 to 49 years using data from a randomised trial of annual mammographic screening starting at age 40 conducted in the UK. A six-state Markov model was constructed to estimate the sensitivity of mammography for invasive and in situ breast cancer and the screen-detectable mean sojourn time for non-progressive in situ, progressive in situ, and invasive breast cancer. Then, a 10-state simulation model of cancer progression, screening, and death, was developed to estimate overdiagnosis attributable to screening. RESULTS: The sensitivity of mammography for invasive and in situ breast cancers was 90% (95% CI, 72 to 99) and 82% (43 to 99), respectively. The screen-detectable mean sojourn time of preclinical non-progressive and progressive in situ cancers was 1.3 (0.4 to 3.4) and 0.11 (0.05 to 0.19) years, respectively, and 0.8 years (0.6 to 1.2) for preclinical invasive breast cancer. The proportion of screen-detected in situ cancers that were non-progressive was 55% (25 to 77) for the first and 40% (22 to 60) for subsequent screens. In our main analysis, overdiagnosis was estimated as 0.7% of screen-detected cancers. A sensitivity analysis, covering a wide range of alternative scenarios, yielded a range of 0.5% to 2.9%. CONCLUSION: Although a high proportion of screen-detected in situ cancers were non-progressive, a majority of these would have presented clinically in the absence of screening. The extent of overdiagnosis due to screening in women aged 40 to 49 was small. Results also suggest annual screening is most suitable for women aged 40 to 49 in the United Kingdom due to short cancer sojourn times. BioMed Central 2012 2012-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4053139/ /pubmed/23194032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr3365 Text en Copyright © 2012 Gunsoy et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gunsoy, Necdet B
Garcia-Closas, Montserrat
Moss, Sue M
Modelling the overdiagnosis of breast cancer due to mammography screening in women aged 40 to 49 in the United Kingdom
title Modelling the overdiagnosis of breast cancer due to mammography screening in women aged 40 to 49 in the United Kingdom
title_full Modelling the overdiagnosis of breast cancer due to mammography screening in women aged 40 to 49 in the United Kingdom
title_fullStr Modelling the overdiagnosis of breast cancer due to mammography screening in women aged 40 to 49 in the United Kingdom
title_full_unstemmed Modelling the overdiagnosis of breast cancer due to mammography screening in women aged 40 to 49 in the United Kingdom
title_short Modelling the overdiagnosis of breast cancer due to mammography screening in women aged 40 to 49 in the United Kingdom
title_sort modelling the overdiagnosis of breast cancer due to mammography screening in women aged 40 to 49 in the united kingdom
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4053139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23194032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr3365
work_keys_str_mv AT gunsoynecdetb modellingtheoverdiagnosisofbreastcancerduetomammographyscreeninginwomenaged40to49intheunitedkingdom
AT garciaclosasmontserrat modellingtheoverdiagnosisofbreastcancerduetomammographyscreeninginwomenaged40to49intheunitedkingdom
AT mosssuem modellingtheoverdiagnosisofbreastcancerduetomammographyscreeninginwomenaged40to49intheunitedkingdom