Cargando…
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation: Comparison between Primary and Revision Surgery
Minimally invasive surgery with a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) is an important minimally invasive fusion technique for the lumbar spine. Lumbar spine reoperation is challenging and is thought to have greater complication risks. The purpose of this study was to compare MIS TLIF w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4053265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24949483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/919248 |
_version_ | 1782320344653103104 |
---|---|
author | Kang, Moo Sung Park, Jeong Yoon Kim, Kyung Hyun Kuh, Sung Uk Chin, Dong Kyu Kim, Keun Su Cho, Yong Eun |
author_facet | Kang, Moo Sung Park, Jeong Yoon Kim, Kyung Hyun Kuh, Sung Uk Chin, Dong Kyu Kim, Keun Su Cho, Yong Eun |
author_sort | Kang, Moo Sung |
collection | PubMed |
description | Minimally invasive surgery with a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) is an important minimally invasive fusion technique for the lumbar spine. Lumbar spine reoperation is challenging and is thought to have greater complication risks. The purpose of this study was to compare MIS TLIF with unilateral screw fixation perioperative results between primary and revision surgeries. This was a prospective study that included 46 patients who underwent MIS TLIF with unilateral pedicle screw. The patients were divided into two groups, primary and revision MIS TLIF, to compare perioperative results and complications. The two groups were similar in age, sex, and level of operation, and were not significantly different in the length of follow-up or clinical results. Although dural tears were more common with the revision group (primary 1; revision 4), operation time, blood loss, total perioperative complication, and fusion rates were not significantly different between the two groups. Both groups showed substantial improvements in VAS and ODI scores one year after surgical treatment. Revision MIS TLIF performed by an experienced surgeon does not necessarily increase the risk of perioperative complication compared with primary surgery. MIS TLIF with unilateral pedicle screw fixation is a valuable option for revision lumbar surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4053265 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40532652014-06-19 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation: Comparison between Primary and Revision Surgery Kang, Moo Sung Park, Jeong Yoon Kim, Kyung Hyun Kuh, Sung Uk Chin, Dong Kyu Kim, Keun Su Cho, Yong Eun Biomed Res Int Clinical Study Minimally invasive surgery with a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) is an important minimally invasive fusion technique for the lumbar spine. Lumbar spine reoperation is challenging and is thought to have greater complication risks. The purpose of this study was to compare MIS TLIF with unilateral screw fixation perioperative results between primary and revision surgeries. This was a prospective study that included 46 patients who underwent MIS TLIF with unilateral pedicle screw. The patients were divided into two groups, primary and revision MIS TLIF, to compare perioperative results and complications. The two groups were similar in age, sex, and level of operation, and were not significantly different in the length of follow-up or clinical results. Although dural tears were more common with the revision group (primary 1; revision 4), operation time, blood loss, total perioperative complication, and fusion rates were not significantly different between the two groups. Both groups showed substantial improvements in VAS and ODI scores one year after surgical treatment. Revision MIS TLIF performed by an experienced surgeon does not necessarily increase the risk of perioperative complication compared with primary surgery. MIS TLIF with unilateral pedicle screw fixation is a valuable option for revision lumbar surgery. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4053265/ /pubmed/24949483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/919248 Text en Copyright © 2014 Moo Sung Kang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Kang, Moo Sung Park, Jeong Yoon Kim, Kyung Hyun Kuh, Sung Uk Chin, Dong Kyu Kim, Keun Su Cho, Yong Eun Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation: Comparison between Primary and Revision Surgery |
title | Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation: Comparison between Primary and Revision Surgery |
title_full | Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation: Comparison between Primary and Revision Surgery |
title_fullStr | Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation: Comparison between Primary and Revision Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation: Comparison between Primary and Revision Surgery |
title_short | Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation: Comparison between Primary and Revision Surgery |
title_sort | minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation: comparison between primary and revision surgery |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4053265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24949483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/919248 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kangmoosung minimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionwithunilateralpediclescrewfixationcomparisonbetweenprimaryandrevisionsurgery AT parkjeongyoon minimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionwithunilateralpediclescrewfixationcomparisonbetweenprimaryandrevisionsurgery AT kimkyunghyun minimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionwithunilateralpediclescrewfixationcomparisonbetweenprimaryandrevisionsurgery AT kuhsunguk minimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionwithunilateralpediclescrewfixationcomparisonbetweenprimaryandrevisionsurgery AT chindongkyu minimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionwithunilateralpediclescrewfixationcomparisonbetweenprimaryandrevisionsurgery AT kimkeunsu minimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionwithunilateralpediclescrewfixationcomparisonbetweenprimaryandrevisionsurgery AT choyongeun minimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionwithunilateralpediclescrewfixationcomparisonbetweenprimaryandrevisionsurgery |