Cargando…

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation: Comparison between Primary and Revision Surgery

Minimally invasive surgery with a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) is an important minimally invasive fusion technique for the lumbar spine. Lumbar spine reoperation is challenging and is thought to have greater complication risks. The purpose of this study was to compare MIS TLIF w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Moo Sung, Park, Jeong Yoon, Kim, Kyung Hyun, Kuh, Sung Uk, Chin, Dong Kyu, Kim, Keun Su, Cho, Yong Eun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4053265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24949483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/919248
_version_ 1782320344653103104
author Kang, Moo Sung
Park, Jeong Yoon
Kim, Kyung Hyun
Kuh, Sung Uk
Chin, Dong Kyu
Kim, Keun Su
Cho, Yong Eun
author_facet Kang, Moo Sung
Park, Jeong Yoon
Kim, Kyung Hyun
Kuh, Sung Uk
Chin, Dong Kyu
Kim, Keun Su
Cho, Yong Eun
author_sort Kang, Moo Sung
collection PubMed
description Minimally invasive surgery with a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) is an important minimally invasive fusion technique for the lumbar spine. Lumbar spine reoperation is challenging and is thought to have greater complication risks. The purpose of this study was to compare MIS TLIF with unilateral screw fixation perioperative results between primary and revision surgeries. This was a prospective study that included 46 patients who underwent MIS TLIF with unilateral pedicle screw. The patients were divided into two groups, primary and revision MIS TLIF, to compare perioperative results and complications. The two groups were similar in age, sex, and level of operation, and were not significantly different in the length of follow-up or clinical results. Although dural tears were more common with the revision group (primary 1; revision 4), operation time, blood loss, total perioperative complication, and fusion rates were not significantly different between the two groups. Both groups showed substantial improvements in VAS and ODI scores one year after surgical treatment. Revision MIS TLIF performed by an experienced surgeon does not necessarily increase the risk of perioperative complication compared with primary surgery. MIS TLIF with unilateral pedicle screw fixation is a valuable option for revision lumbar surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4053265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40532652014-06-19 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation: Comparison between Primary and Revision Surgery Kang, Moo Sung Park, Jeong Yoon Kim, Kyung Hyun Kuh, Sung Uk Chin, Dong Kyu Kim, Keun Su Cho, Yong Eun Biomed Res Int Clinical Study Minimally invasive surgery with a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) is an important minimally invasive fusion technique for the lumbar spine. Lumbar spine reoperation is challenging and is thought to have greater complication risks. The purpose of this study was to compare MIS TLIF with unilateral screw fixation perioperative results between primary and revision surgeries. This was a prospective study that included 46 patients who underwent MIS TLIF with unilateral pedicle screw. The patients were divided into two groups, primary and revision MIS TLIF, to compare perioperative results and complications. The two groups were similar in age, sex, and level of operation, and were not significantly different in the length of follow-up or clinical results. Although dural tears were more common with the revision group (primary 1; revision 4), operation time, blood loss, total perioperative complication, and fusion rates were not significantly different between the two groups. Both groups showed substantial improvements in VAS and ODI scores one year after surgical treatment. Revision MIS TLIF performed by an experienced surgeon does not necessarily increase the risk of perioperative complication compared with primary surgery. MIS TLIF with unilateral pedicle screw fixation is a valuable option for revision lumbar surgery. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4053265/ /pubmed/24949483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/919248 Text en Copyright © 2014 Moo Sung Kang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Kang, Moo Sung
Park, Jeong Yoon
Kim, Kyung Hyun
Kuh, Sung Uk
Chin, Dong Kyu
Kim, Keun Su
Cho, Yong Eun
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation: Comparison between Primary and Revision Surgery
title Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation: Comparison between Primary and Revision Surgery
title_full Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation: Comparison between Primary and Revision Surgery
title_fullStr Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation: Comparison between Primary and Revision Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation: Comparison between Primary and Revision Surgery
title_short Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation: Comparison between Primary and Revision Surgery
title_sort minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation: comparison between primary and revision surgery
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4053265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24949483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/919248
work_keys_str_mv AT kangmoosung minimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionwithunilateralpediclescrewfixationcomparisonbetweenprimaryandrevisionsurgery
AT parkjeongyoon minimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionwithunilateralpediclescrewfixationcomparisonbetweenprimaryandrevisionsurgery
AT kimkyunghyun minimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionwithunilateralpediclescrewfixationcomparisonbetweenprimaryandrevisionsurgery
AT kuhsunguk minimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionwithunilateralpediclescrewfixationcomparisonbetweenprimaryandrevisionsurgery
AT chindongkyu minimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionwithunilateralpediclescrewfixationcomparisonbetweenprimaryandrevisionsurgery
AT kimkeunsu minimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionwithunilateralpediclescrewfixationcomparisonbetweenprimaryandrevisionsurgery
AT choyongeun minimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionwithunilateralpediclescrewfixationcomparisonbetweenprimaryandrevisionsurgery